Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

Regulation 11, Rule 18

Forecast
2016102043State & Local

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

AI Contract Overview

Show more

Air District Regulation 11, Rule 18, managed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, focuses on reducing health risks from toxic air contaminants at existing facilities across nine Bay Area counties, including Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, southwestern Solano, and southern Sonoma. The regulation prioritizes facilities with the highest health impacts, requiring those that exceed risk action level thresholds of ten per million cancer risk or a 1.0 hazard index to either reduce risks below these levels via an approved risk reduction plan or implement Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Toxics on all significant sources. A significant source is defined as one posing a health risk of 1.0 per million cancer risk or a 0.2 hazard index. The rule is implemented in four phases based on the facility's priority score or the toxic emissions source. Recent amendments to the regulation aim to resolve implementation delays by refining Health Risk Assessment procedures, including the use of district-approved modeling protocols and the formalization of public comment periods. Additionally, the amendments clarify the terminology and timelines for reviewing draft Risk Reduction Plans and the criteria for granting implementation extensions. These updates are supported by a CEQA Notice of Determination, confirming that the procedural changes do not alter the environmental impacts previously analyzed in the 2017 Recirculated Final Environmental Impact Report.

General Info

Bay Area Air District Rule 18 mandates toxic air contaminant reductions for high-risk facilities.

Agency

California → Bay Area Air Quality Management District

Place of Performance

CA

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Sign up to view the full breakdown with detailed analysis of each section.

Timeline

PhaseForecast
Posted

forecast

Prepare for this forecast

Research the agency, track this forecast, and prepare your capture plan before the solicitation opens.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyCalifornia → Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Contacts1 person available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
California → Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Andrea AndersonSenior Air Quality Specialist

Full Description

Show more
Air District Regulation 11, Rule 18: Reduction of Risk from Air Toxic Emissions at Existing Facilities (Rule 11-18) was adopted by the Air District on November 14, 2017 to address facilities whose emissions of toxic air contaminants (TACs) pose an elevated risk to nearby residents and workers. The purpose of Rule 11-18 is to prioritize existing facilities with the highest health impacts across the Bay Area and require them to reduce those impacts. Rule 11-18 requires existing facilities with health risks above specified risk action level thresholds to either reduce those health risks below the Rule’s risk action thresholds or implement Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Toxics on all significant sources of health risks. When Rule 11-18 was adopted, a Recirculated Final Environmental Iimpact Report (RFEIR) was prepared and certified for the project, which found that the project would have significant impacts in the areas of air quality, greenhouse gases, hazards and hazardous materials, and water supply. At that time, the Air District adopted findings pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091 and a statement of overriding considerations. The Air District has now amended Rule 11-18 in an effort to address delays in rule implementation. Several amendments address Health Risk Assessment (HRA) procedures, including: (1) requiring facilities to prepare preliminary HRAs using Air District-approved modeling protocols; (2) formalizing the current practice of holding a public comment period on the preliminary HRA concurrent with the existing 90-day comment period for the facility; and (3) outlining what happens when additional testing or emissions data may affect the facility’s HRA results and Risk Action Level status. Amendments are also made to Risk Reduction Plans (RRP) procedures, including (1) revising the terminology and timeline associated with the district’s review of draft RRPs prior to public comment; and (2) clarifying the circumstances under which extensions to the implementation of an RRP or risk reduction measure may be granted. The Air District has also adopted related amendments to the Implementation Procedures associated with Rule 11-18 and has adopted an Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to CEQA to implement the mitigation measures in the RFEIR.

Similar Contracts

Same NAICS industry code

NAICS: 541620
New
SLED
On-Call Solid Waste Data Analysis and Economic Services
Solicitation # 26-202-S
Seattle Public Utilities is seeking an on-call consultant to provide expert solid waste data analysis and economic services to support the city's Zero Waste goals. This contract, with an estimated value of $625,000 and a duration of up to five years, focuses on leveraging extensive datasets to evaluate the effectiveness, equity, and feasibility of solid waste incentives, programs, and policies. The scope of work includes program evaluation using causal inference, economic modeling, demand forecasting, longitudinal analysis of waste characteristics, and the extraction of data from Microsoft Access databases. A key component of the engagement is the translation of complex technical findings into actionable insights through data visualization, strategic storytelling, and high-quality reports for both technical and non-technical audiences. The selection process is based on a weighted evaluation of project team qualifications and research and analytical capabilities, with a strong emphasis on equity-centered analysis and the ability to manage multiple projects in an on-call environment. Awarded consultants must adhere to strict compliance standards, including mandatory WMBE inclusion plans for contracts over $343,000, adherence to the Americans with Disabilities Act and WCAG accessibility guidelines, and compliance with Seattle's Equal Benefits and minimum wage ordinances. The contract is governed by a template that incorporates FAR Part 31 for allowable overhead costs and requires specific insurance coverages, including Commercial General Liability and Worker's Compensation. Work is assigned via individual work assignments, each with its own defined schedule and deliverables.
Seattle Public Utilities

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 5 days
View Details

Prepare for this forecast

Research this forecast and prepare for the solicitation

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS