Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Government Contract opportunity from Department Of Defense was posted on June 16, 2008. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Request for Information (RFI) Regarding Technology Maturation Efforts

Closed
N00019-08-P1-ZA240Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

General Info

NAICS

336413 - Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Place of Performance

MD

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

PhaseClosed
Posted

special-notice

Response Deadline

Deadline has passed

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Defense → Naval Air Systems Command
Contacts2 people available
OfficePATUXENT RIVER, MD, 20670-5000, USA
Office AddressPATUXENT RIVER, MD, 20670-5000, USA
Contacts
Carolyn A AbneyContract Specialist

Full Description

Show more
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI). THERE IS CURRENTLY NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE AVAILABLE, NOR IS A DIRECTLY ASSOCIATED SOLICITATION PACKAGE ANTICIPATED. Program Executive Office (Tactical Aircraft Programs) (PEO(T)) is seeking historical information regarding technology maturation efforts. This information will be used to develop metrics regarding planned versus actual experience with maturing of technologies from Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) 3 through 9, with particular interest in TRL growth from 3 through 6. The contractor is asked to provide information relative to its experience with maturing technology from early levels to its final form and under mission conditions (TRL 9), with particular interest in those that have proven ready for system level development and integration through successful completion of system/subsystem model, or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment (TRL 6). History: Department of Defense Instruction 5000.2 [3.7.2] requires acquisition programs to assess technology maturity levels prior to proceeding to a Milestone B acquisition decision. Because the use of Technology Readiness Levels (1 thought 9) assessments in the Department of Defense is relatively new, limited data exists that can be used to predict, measure, or validate maturity efforts, or estimates as they relate to cost and schedule adherence as that maturity moves from TRL 3 through the remaining levels. To position PEO(T) to better predict and measure technology maturation efforts, it is developing metrics based on actual historical data. Early technology maturation efforts are often conducted by industry and therefore it is believed the government's data can be optimized by the addition of industry information. Scope: Information requested: 1) Name and description of technology maturation effort you are referring to in this request for information; 2) Approximately when did the technology maturation effort start; 3) At what phase in the acquisition cycle was this technology maturation effort; (i.e. Material Solution Analysis, Technology Development, Engineering & Manufacturing, Production & Deployment, Development & Demonstration, Operations & Support); 4) If assigned, what was the ACAT level of the associated program (i.e. ACAT IC, ACAT ID, ACAT II, ACAT III, non-POR; 5) At what technology readiness level did this maturation effort begin, within the scope of this evaluation (3 through 9); 6) At what technology readiness level did this maturation effort end, within the scope of this evaluation (3 through 9); 7) Assuming the technology maturation effort's originally stated technical performance goal equaled 100%, what level of that goal did the effort actually achieve within the subject maturation effort (i.e. 50% through 100%); 8) Did the performance achieved meet program technical goals at a level of acceptance sufficient to proceed with the program (provide amplifying remarks, if appropriate); 9) Describe the goals and results of the technology maturation effort. (as an example; - the goal of the technology maturation effort was to improve the APX-1234 system's transmission rate from 24kbps to 10Mbps. The result was; we achieved 5Mbps.; 10) What was the planned total cost of the technology maturation effort; 11) What was the actual total cost of the technology maturation effort; 12) What was the planned schedule duration, in months, of the technology maturation effort? (Please, be as precise as possible. If not known exactly, please estimate within a range (i.e. 12 - 14 months)); 13) What was the actual schedule duration in months of the technology maturation effort? (Please, be as precise as possible. If not known exactly, please estimate within a range (i.e. 12 - 14 months)); 14) Was there significant contractor IR&D investment used to mature this technology? 15) If - yes, What amount of contractor IR&D was invested? Any firms with information relevant to the above are requested to submit the following in an electronically sortable, commercially available form to the Government: 1. Answers to the questions above. 2. Amplifying information related to your answers (no more than 50 pages without prior discussions with point of contact below). 3. A point of contact to answer questions concerning your data, if required. Please provide feedback on this request. All comments or information pertaining to improving or enhancing the government's ability to measure technology maturation efforts that industry feels appropriate should be submitted. Please limit your response to efforts no older than the last 10 years. Tutorials concerning TRL assessment methodology is not appropriate, or desired. This RFI is issued for the purpose of gathering existing information that can be made available. No information will be traceable by any user(s) to its source upon aggregation of the responses. This announcement is not a formal solicitation and does not constitute a request for proposal. Availability of any formal solicitation will be announced under a separate Federal Business Opportunities announcement. This RFI is for information and planning purposes only and is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government. Each response must reference this RFI number: N00019-08-P1-ZA240. No contract will be awarded from this announcement. Information herein is based on the best information available at the time of publication, is subject to revision, and is not binding upon the government. The government WILL NOT PAY for any information received in response to this RFI nor will the government compensate the respondent for any cost incurred in developing information for the government. The Government will not release any information marked with a Proprietary legend, received in response to this RFI, to any firm, agency, or individual outside the Government without written permission in accordance to the legend. It is requested that information be submitted within 15 working days after publication posting of this notice. Any request for copies of solicitations will not be addressed since this is a request for information only and is not a request for proposal. It is requested that information be submitted to: Carolyn Abney (carolyn.abney@navy.mil; 301-757-7060).

More opportunities from Department Of Defense → Naval Air Systems Command

Same awarding agency

NAICS: 541330
New
Federal
PMA-290 Technical and Engineering Services
Solicitation # N0042125RFPREQAPM2900480-2
The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division and Naval Air Systems Command, supporting PMA-290, intend to award a sole source Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract to Aviation Systems Engineering Company Inc. This effort, categorized under NAICS 541330, provides technical engineering and fleet deliverable capabilities for Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Aircraft and associated ground stations, specifically supporting the P-8A program. The scope includes systems engineering for new and modernized systems, software development and integration within a DEVSECOPS environment, cybersecurity, and the production of training materials. The contractor is also required to provide warehouse facilities for equipment storage and aircraft modification facilities near NAS Jacksonville, Florida. Performance is expected to begin in the third quarter of FY27, with work distributed across government sites in Patuxent River, Maryland; Seattle and Oak Harbor, Washington; Jacksonville, Florida; and Charleston, South Carolina, with approximately 20 percent of work performed at the contractor site. A critical requirement for this contract is adherence to the Navy Cybersecurity Workforce qualifications, with privileged access requiring specific IA certifications such as Security+ CE or SSCP. This notice is for informational purposes only and is not a formal request for proposal. Primary points of contact for this effort are Contracts Specialist Jacob Kerig and Procuring Contracting Officer Michele J. Estep.
Engineering Services

POSTED

about 8 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 14 days
View Details
NAICS: 51321
New
Federal
FortiNet FortiGate Software License Renewals
Solicitation # N00019-26-RFPREQ-APM290-0806
The Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) is soliciting proposals for a Firm Fixed Price, Indefinite Quantity contract to procure FortiNet FortiGate software license renewals and subscriptions. This requirement specifically supports communications security for the P-8A Poseidon aircraft program, benefiting the United States Navy, the Royal Australian Air Force, and several Foreign Military Sales customers, including the United Kingdom, Norway, Republic of Korea, Canada, New Zealand, and Germany. The scope is strictly limited to FortiGuard Antivirus and Intrusion Prevention System subscriptions for FortiGate SX and BX modules, explicitly excluding FortiCare services, hardware support, or remote system access. The contract includes a base year running from February 1, 2027, through January 31, 2028, with four subsequent option years, for a total period of performance ending in January 2030. This is a limited competition open only to vendors listed on the Fortinet Federal Partners list; proposals from non-authorized resellers will not be considered. The acquisition is set aside for small businesses, including HUBZone, SDVOSB, and WOSB entities, with a HUBZone price evaluation preference applied. Award will be granted to the responsible offeror proposing the lowest total price for a minimum of 324 and a maximum of 1,378 units. Proposals must be submitted electronically via DoD Safe to the designated points of contact by October 28, 2026, at 4:00 PM. Invoicing and acceptance will be managed through the Wide Area WorkFlow system, with inspection and acceptance occurring at the destination in Patuxent River, Maryland.

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 8 days
View Details

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS