Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 14 at 2:00 PM EDT

Register Free →

Request for Information: Timing of Submission of Prior Approval Requests for IDeA Program Post-Award Projects

Active
NOT-GM-26-012Grant

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

AI Contract Overview

Show more

The National Institute of General Medical Sciences is soliciting feedback from the Institutional Development Award program community to optimize the submission and review timelines for post-award project prior approval requests. This initiative aims to address current inefficiencies caused by high submission volumes during peak periods and frequent errors in documentation, particularly regarding clinical trials and human subjects compliance. By refining these processes, the agency intends to ensure that projects align with NIH priorities and biomedical research capacity goals while reducing administrative delays. Two primary scheduling approaches are being considered: a single annual deadline window per program or two separate deadline windows per fiscal year. Each option proposes specific timeframes for INBRE, IDeA-CTR, and COBRE programs, with estimated review periods ranging from 45 to 60 days for complete submissions. Interested parties are invited to submit voluntary comments on the advantages, disadvantages, and potential alternatives to these models by December 4, 2026.

General Info

NIGMS seeks feedback on optimizing post-award project prior approval submission and review timelines.

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

PhaseSources Sought
Posted

Sources Sought

Ready to pursue this opportunity?

Start your free trial to track this contract, build proposals with AI assistance, and manage your pipeline.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyNational Institutes Of Health → National Institute Of General Medical Sciences
Contacts1 person available
OfficeUSA

Full Description

Show more
Introduction NIGMS is soliciting input from the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) program community to help determine the best timelines for the submission and review of IDeA program post-award project (such as pilot and research project) prior approval requests. Background Recipients of IDeA programs, including the IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE), IDeA Clinical and Translational Research Programs (IDeA CTR) and the Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE), submit over 600 post-award projects on a rolling basis every fiscal year, as part of the post-award prior approval process. While NIGMS aims to provide an approval/denial response within 30 days, there are several challenges with the prior approval process, including: High submission volume during Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) periods and during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. Incomplete or outdated submissions that require extensive follow-up. Examples of common issues include projects involving clinical trials or human subjects that are not compliant with NIH Federal-wide Assurance requirements and certifications, including: Expired or no IRB approval Underspecified or missing Data and Safety Monitoring documentation Missing Section 2.2 of the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form. Administrative oversight required to ensure that each project aligns with and is compliant with NIH priorities, policies, and regulations. Implementation Considerations NIGMS recognizes the importance of post-award projects in the IDeA program as a vehicle to build biomedical research capacity, as well as the importance of an efficient prior approval process. Accordingly, NIGMS seeks feedback on approaches to ensure a more efficient prior approval process for post-award projects. Below are two approaches to consider: One deadline window per fiscal year: INBRE: November 1 to December 31 IDeA-CTR: October 15 to January 15 COBRE: Four months after the start of the budget period Example: For a January 1 budget period start, the post award submission date would be May 1 This scenario accounts for NIGMS' programmatic and grant management cycles. Each complete and compliant prior approval request would be reviewed within 45 days of submission. Two deadlines per fiscal year: INBRE and IDeA-CTR: September to November and February to April COBRE: Four months after the start of the budget period Example: For a January 1 budget period start, the post award submission date would be May 1. This scenario accounts for NIGMS' programmatic and grant management cycles. Each complete and compliant prior approval request would be reviewed within 45-60 days of submission, with longer review times for submissions approaching the fourth quarter when NIGMS prioritizes funding actions. Regardless of the approach, a timely prior approval process is dependent on submissions that are complete and include all required materials as specified in the relevant NOFO and in the Notice of Award. As stewards of the taxpayers' investments in biomedical research, NIGMS must ensure that each post-award project is mission-appropriate research that helps build biomedical research capacity in IDeA states. Prior approval submissions for post-award projects that are incomplete or do not align with NIH priorities will be denied without a full programmatic review. Information Requested Comments are requested on potential approaches to ensure a more efficient prior approval process for post-award projects for IDeA programs. Response to this Notice is voluntary. Respondents are free to address any or all the topics listed below, or any other relevant topic for NIGMS to consider. Respondents should not feel compelled to address all items. Advantages and disadvantages of the proposed approaches Possible unintended consequences Other approaches that should be considered Submitting a Response Comments should be submitted electronically to the email address below by December 4, 2026. This Notice is for planning purposes only and should not be construed as a policy, solicitation of applications, or as an obligation on the part of the Government to provide support for any ideas identified in response to it. Please note that the Government will not pay for the preparation of any information submitted or for its use of that information. Responses will be compiled and may be shared publicly in unredacted form. Please do not include any proprietary, classified, confidential, or sensitive information in your response. The NIH may use information gathered by this Notice to inform the development of future guidance.

Similar Contracts

Same NAICS industry code

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Get AI-powered intelligence on this solicitation and the ones like it

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS