SEALER, CHEMICAL

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE4AX-16-D-9010 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, with CAGE code 79343, for the procurement of 2.000 cases of chemical sealer identified by NSN 6850014762407 and part number PR-2201/PR-2200, at a total price of $1,272.60. The order was issued on July 20, 2026, with delivery required by July 31, 2026, to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, at the specified destination address for military logistics operations. The contracting vehicle is a delivery order placed under an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract, and the awardee is certified as a Small Disadvantaged Woman-Owned Small Business, with socioeconomic certifications reflected in Block 11 of the order. Packaging and shipping instructions mandate use of the fastest traceable means with no parcel post allowed, and all packages must be marked with the contract number SPE4AX-16-D-9010, delivery order number SPE4A6-26-F-CWBP, the mark for W50YER, and the Transportation Control Number W50YER62010054. Inspection and acceptance occur at the delivery point by an authorized government representative, and compliance with the basic contract terms is required for acceptance. Invoicing must be submitted electronically through Wide Area Workflow in accordance with DFARS 252.232-7003, and payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at the designated address in Columbus, Ohio. The order is rated under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) as specified in 15 CFR 700, indicating priority status for fulfillment. The contracting officer representative is Amanda Parker, reachable via email at [email hidden], and administrative support is provided by Holly Dunganan at DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia. No standard FAR or DFARS contract clauses are enumerated in the document, and no attachments are listed, though compliance with general DoD logistics standards is implied. The contract contains no option periods, extensions, or additional line items, and the evaluation basis for award remains unspecified, though the low value and administrative nature suggest a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable approach. The