SEALER, CHEMICAL

A delivery order under the Defense Logistics Agency’s indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract SPE4AX16D9010 has been awarded to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, CAGE 79343, for the supply of one box of Sikaflex 227 300ml chemical sealer, identified by NSN 6850015794656, at a total price of $305.07. The order, issued as SPE4A626FZV33, was awarded on July 14, 2026, and requires delivery to Camp Carroll, Waegwan, South Korea, no later than July 27, 2026, with the delivery point specified as FOB destination. The contractor is recognized as a small disadvantaged woman-owned business, triggering compliance obligations under FAR Part 19 and the Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contract Program, including potential reporting through SAM.gov and adherence to subcontracting plan requirements. The order is classified as a rated priority under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) per 15 CFR 700, mandating prioritized performance and handling in accordance with DoD directives. Packaging and marking must align with standard military shipment requirements, including the use of DD Form 1155 and inclusion of the Tracking Control Number W50YED61950015 and Billing Point W50YED, though no specific MIL-STDs are formally cited. Invoices must be submitted in accordance with DFARS 252.232-7003, implying electronic processing through Wide Area Workflow, and payment will be handled by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at P.O. Box 182317, Columbus, OH 43218-2317. The contracting officer is Amanda Parker of DLA Aviation in Richmond, VA, with Holly Dunganan serving as the local administrative contact. The item is procured under a fixed-price delivery order structure within an IDIQ framework, with no specified options or extended performance periods, and all acceptance responsibilities rest with the government at the delivery destination. No technical specifications, quality standards, or additional clauses beyond those referenced are explicitly outlined in the award documentation, and the award is presumed to be based on lowest price technically acceptable criteria due to the simplicity and low value of the requirement.