SILICONE COMPOUND

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) awarded a delivery order under contract SPE4AX-16-D-9010 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC (CAGE 79343), a certified small business, for the procurement of one unit of silicone compound identified by NSN 6850011451768 and manufacturer part number RTV106 12T. The total contract value is $43.87, with delivery required by August 4, 2026, to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, at Building HMCP BLDG 5207 DOOR 8A, address 8TH ST AND DESERT STORM AVE, 42223-0000. The order is rated under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) as DO-A3, mandating expedited handling and priority fulfillment in alignment with national defense needs. The contract specifies FOB Destination terms, meaning the seller retains responsibility for shipping costs and risk until the goods arrive at the designated location. Packaging must adhere to strict labeling requirements, including the MARK FOR identifier W50YER, Transaction Control Number W50YER61960034, Required Delivery Date 211 (Julian), Transportation Priority 2, and the inclusion of CAGE code 01139 and NSN on all shipping documentation. Shipments must be sent via the fastest traceable means, with parcel post prohibited, and must be fully documented to ensure traceability and accountability. Payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service using remittance address P.O. BOX 182317, COLUMBUS OH 43218-2317, under code SL4701, with invoices submitted in compliance with DFARS 252.232-7003, which requires electronic submission through WAWF. Acceptance of the item is performed by the Government at the destination, with no specific performance or quality standards beyond compliance with the contract reference to manufacturer part numbers and basic terms. The contracting officer representative is Amanda Parker, with contact information provided, and the local administrative point of contact is Holly Dunganan. No formal evaluation factors beyond price and delivery compliance are documented, indicating the award was likely made under a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable approach due to the minimal scope and value