TIRE, PNEUMATIC, VEHI

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded contract SPE7LX26F4881 to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, LLC (CAGE 79343) for the supply of pneumatic vehicle tires identified by NSN 2610002628653 at a total value of $31,362.10, with an award date of July 14, 2026. This contract is a modification to the existing delivery order SPE7LX19D0029, initiated unilaterally under Performance Work Statement P2-31.0 to adjust the delivery schedule due to delays in long-lead-time components. The original delivery date of June 8, 2026, was extended to May 7, 2027, with no change to the contract amount, quantity, or technical specifications. The contracting officer, Megan Isherwood of DLA Land and Maritime, issued the modification via Standard Form 30, confirming compliance with FAR 43.103(b), and the work remains governed by the basic contract’s performance requirements without additional specifications or supplemental clauses being identified. The contractor is located in Fairfield, New Jersey, and delivery is expected at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, though neither the place of performance nor the point of inspection is formally designated in the documentation. The procurement falls under NAICS code 423130 for tire and automotive parts distribution and is treated as a commercial item acquisition with a likely Lowest Price Technically Acceptable basis due to its low dollar value and standardized nature. No packaging, preservation, or marking requirements beyond basic NSN and CAGE code identification are specified, nor is any MIL-STD referenced despite common industry practice. The administration is handled by DLA Land and Maritime with oversight from DCMA Springfield, though no Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical representative is named, and no invoicing method, payment office details, or accounting data are populated. The award does not include options, special requirements, or socioeconomic certifications, and no representations or certifications from the offeror are documented. Electronic submissions via email to the contracting officer are acceptable, with no stated page or format restrictions beyond adherence to the SF-30 form structure, and the contract lacks any listed attachments or supplemental documentation.