UVEX GENESIS CLEAR

The contract solicitation SPE8E9-26-T-3251, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency under the Department of Defense, seeks the procurement of 20 units of UVEX GENESIS CLEAR protective eyewear, identified by NSN 4240-01-552-4142, with a response deadline of August 6, 2026. The procurement falls under NAICS code 423460 and is not set aside for any specific socioeconomic category. Delivery is required FOB ORIGIN to a designated destination in Grand Prairie, Texas, with acceptance to occur at the delivery point by government representatives. The item must be supplied in compliance with MIL-STD-2073-1E for packaging and MIL-STD-129 for marking, labeling, and barcoding, with preservation method code 10 (cleaning and drying) and no preservation material applied. Only eyewear approved and listed on the Army’s Authorized Protective Eyewear List (APEL) will be accepted, and inspection will occur at destination using FAR 52.246-1. The contract incorporates a comprehensive set of federal and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clauses governing cybersecurity, hazardous materials, transportation, subcontracting, and compliance. Critical requirements include adherence to NIST SP 800-171 for safeguarding covered defense information, mandatory reporting of cyber incidents under 252.204-7012, and strict prohibitions on the use of covered telecommunications equipment from entities like Huawei and ZTE under 252.204-7018. Contractors must comply with hazard communication standards (29 CFR 1910.1200) for labeling and providing Safety Data Sheets, and are prohibited from using hexavalent chromium or storing/treating hazardous materials improperly. Transportation by ocean must use U.S.-flag vessels unless a waiver is approved. The solicitation mandates electronic submission via DIBBS using Wide Area WorkFlow for all invoicing and payment requests, and requires offerors to complete representations regarding small business status, unique entity identifiers, CAGE codes, and compliance with whistleblower and anti-arbitration provisions. No formal evaluation factors or award basis are specified, suggesting a potential lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) approach. All contract administration details, including payment offices and points of contact, remain to be populated upon award, with Matthew Kruc listed as the primary point