28--ENGINES, TURBINES, AND COMPONENTS.REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR THE IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM (ITEP)

IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM (ITEP), REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI), 26 JANUARY 2012. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS FOR INFORMATION AND PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN INVITATION FOR BID (IFB) OR A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY COST ASSOCIATED WITH PREPARATION OF ANY RESPONSE TO THIS RFI OR ITS ASSOCIATED INFORMATIONAL PACKAGE. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 PURPOSE 1.2 CONCEPT SECTION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE 2.1 PURPOSE 2.2 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA 2.3 TECHNICAL DATA 2.4 COST DATA 2.5 SCHEDULE DATA 2.6 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS 2.7 QUESTIONS AND DEADLINE SECTION 3 TECHNICAL DATA 3.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVE 3.2 PURPOSE 3.3 CONCEPT DESCRIPTION 3.4 TRADE STUDIES 3.5 ALTERNATE SOLUTIONS SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 PURPOSE. THE U.S. ARMY UTILITY HELICOPTERS PROJECT OFFICE (UHPO) SEEKS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND QUALIF! ICATION (AND DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED LOGISTIC AND TRAINING MATERIAL) OF AN IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH (IAW) THE DRAFT PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AV-E-8593H (AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST). THE ITEP IS A 3000 HORSEPOWER ENGINE PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES ADVANCED TURBOSHAFT PROPULSION CAPABILITY PRIMARILY FOR APPLICATION TO THE ARMY?S BLACK HAWK AND APACHE HELICOPTERS. THE ITEP IS BASED UPON ADVANCED AFFORDABLE TURBINE ENGINE (AATE) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, WHICH EMPHASIZES SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY AND REDUCED COST OF OWNERSHIP THAT SUPPORTS THE DOD?S CAPABILITY NEEDS FOR MULTI-MISSION MOBILITY, PERSISTENT ENGAGEMENT, PROTECTION, AND PERSISTENT COMMAND AND CONTROL, INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE (C2ISR) PLATFORMS. ITEP IS FOCUSED ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND QUALIFICATION OF A NEW CENTERLINE, TURBOSHAFT ENGINE THAT IS NEEDED TO SUPPORT MODERNIZATION REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE APACHE AND BLACK HAWK REMAIN OPERATIONALLY EFFECTIVE W! ELL INTO THE 21ST CENTURY. PREVIOUS REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION FOR THIS SUBJECT WERE ISSUED ON 22 JULY 2009, W58RGZ-09-R-0589. UPDATED REQUEST FOR INFORMATION WERE ISSUED ON 14 DECEMBER 2010, W58RGZ-11-R-0164 AND AMENDED ON 27 DECEMBER 2010 AS W58RGZ-11-R-0173. THIS RFI REQUESTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO ALTERNATE STRATEGIES, TIMELINES AND TRADE STUDIES. 1.2 CONCEPT. FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE AATE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION, THE GOVERNMENT WILL SEEK A ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING AND DEVELOPMENT EFFORT THAT RESULTS IN A FULL QUALIFICATION OF AN ENGINE THAT MEETS THE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE (AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST) AND CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINED IN THE PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AV-E-8593H (AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST). SECTION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE 2.1 PURPOSE. TO EXPLAIN THE FORMAT AND TYPE OF INFORMATION THE GOVERNMENT WISHES TO RECEIVE IN RESPONSE TO THIS RFI, AND TO DEFINE THE DATA THE GOVERNMENT WILL PROVIDE. RESPONSES SHALL BE STRUCTURED AGAINST EACH OF THE MAJOR AREAS OF INTEREST, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS RFI AND SHALL BE IN ENGLISH U! SING U.S. MILITARY/NATO TERMS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 2.2 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA. ALL GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA WILL BE PROVIDED ELECTRONICALLY ON CD-ROM. UPON RELEASE OF THIS RFI, CD-ROMS WILL BE AVAILABLE IN PERSON OR BY MAIL FROM THE UTILITY HELICOPTERS PROJECT OFFICE (UHPO), PEO AVIATION, U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND. THE CD- ROM WILL CONTAIN UNCLASSIFIED DATA AND DATA, WHOSE EXPORT IS RESTRICTED BY THE ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT (TITLE 22, U.S.C SEC 2751 ET SEQ), OR THE EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT (TITLE 50, U.S.C. APP 2401-2402). ANY U.S. CITIZEN REPRESENTING ANY U.S. ENTITY THAT HAS RELEVANT AEROSPACE BUSINESS MAY REVIEW/RECEIVE THE INFORMATION BY SUBMITTING A VISIT REQUEST PROVIDING THE NECESSARY INFORMATION TO VERIFY THE COMPANY/INDIVIDUAL SECURITY CLEARANCE TO MS. DEWANNA ROSS (FAX: +1 (555) 000-0000). FOREIGN VISIT REQUESTS ARE SUBMITTED THROUGH RESPECTIVE EMBASSIES TO HQDA, ATTN: DAMI-IR. REQUESTS RECEIVED IN ANY OTHER MANNER WILL NOT BE HONORED. THE FOLLOWING I! NFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED ON CD-ROM FOR CONTRACTOR USE: ENGINE SPECIFICATION, AV-E-8593H PRF, AS WELL AS COST AND SCHEDULE TEMPLATES "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED IN SUPPORT OF RFI RESPONSES WILL BE PROVIDED AS THAT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. 2.3 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS. THE GOVERNMENT ANTICIPATES USING THE FOLLOWING SUPPORT CONTRACTORS TO ASSIST IN THE EVALUATION OF YOUR RESPONSES TO THIS RFI. COMPLETE EVALUATIONS OF RESPONSES WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE UNLESS RESPONDENTS EXECUTE NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS WITH THESE CONTRACTORS. IF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT CONTRACTORS ARE TO BE UTILIZED DURING THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS, RESPONDENTS WILL BE NOTIFIED TO OBTAIN NECESSARY AGREEMENTS. RESPONDENTS SHOULD PROVIDE COPIES OF THESE AGREEMENTS WITH THEIR RESPONSES: A) CAS INC., P.O. BOX 11190 (100 QUALITY CIRCLE), ATTN: MR. CHARLES W. COLLINS, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35814, PHONE: +1 (555) 000-0000, FAX: +1 (555) 000-0000 E-MAIL: contact@example.gov; B) TECOLOTE RESEARCH, INC., 101 QUALITY CIRCLE NW SUITE 110, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35806-4534. C) CAMBER CORP., 635 DISCOVERY DRIVE, ! HUNTSVILLE, AL 35806-2801. D) QUANTI TECH, 300 VOYAGER WAY, SUITE 300, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35806. 2.4 QUESTIONS AND DEADLINE. TO RECEIVE FULL CONSIDERATION, RESPONSES MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN 60 DAYS AFTER RELEASE OF THIS RFI. PRESENTATIONS, IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR THE GOVERNMENT, WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONSES TO THE RFI AND ANY PRESENTATION MATERIAL SHALL BE DELIVERED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (MICROSOFT WORD, MICROSOFT EXCEL, MICROSOFT POWERPOINT AND/OR MICROSOFT PROJECT SUBMITTED ON A CD-ROM). SECTION 3 TECHNICAL DATA 3.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVE. THE GOAL OF THE PROGRAM IS TO DEVELOP AND QUALIFY AN ENGINE THAT MEETS THE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES IN A COST EFFECTIVE AND TIMELY MANNER. 3.2 PURPOSE. THE GOVERNMENT DESIRES TO OBTAIN INFORMATION TO ASSIST IN DEVELOPING A TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION AND CORRESPONDING ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE. SPECIFICALLY, THE GOVERNMENT DESIRES INDUSTRY COMMENTS TO THE DRAFT ENGINE SPECIF! ICATION WHICH HAS INCORPORATED PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED INDUSTRY COMMENTS AS WELL AS OTHER RECENT ADDITIONS; COST/SCHEDULE INFORMATION RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND QUALIFICATION OF THE ENGINE AND INFORMATION SUPPORTING VARIOUS TRADE STUDIES. 3.3 CONCEPT DESCRIPTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DRAFT ENGINE PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AND PROVIDE RATIONALE ON ANY PROPOSED REQUIREMENT CHANGES. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO THIS RFI SHOULD CONTAIN TECHNICAL INFORMATION SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONTRACTOR'S CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE. INFORMATION SHALL, IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO CONVEY AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROPOSED CONCEPT, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: " PROPOSED CONCEPT " SCHEDULE " DEVELOPMENT COSTS* " RECURRING COSTS * " TEAMING REQUIREMENTS " PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES " AIRCRAFT MODIFICATION/IMPACTS " GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI) / GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT (GFE) REQUIREMENTS " TECHNOLOGY MATURITY USING TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT LEVELS USED BY DOD " PROJECTED COMPLIANCE TO THE DRA! FT PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION (AV-E-8593H) * COST DATA SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN FY 12 CONSTANT DOLLARS. USE MONTHS AFTER CONTRACT AWARD AS A TIME BASIS FOR COST REPORTING. IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING TECHNICAL DATA ON CONCEPTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD DISCUSS ABILITY TO MEET FULL QUALIFICATION, LOGISTICS AND OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS. 3.4 TRADE STUDIES. RECOMMEND AND PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR POTENTIAL TRADE STUDIES THAT OFFER APPROACHES THAT WOULD REDUCE TOTAL PROGRAM RISK, COST AND/OR SCHEDULE. INCLUDE COST AND SCHEDULE IMPACT OF VARIOUS ACQUISITION STRATEGIES, SUCH AS DEFERRING FINAL DOWN-SELECT OF COMPETITORS UNTIL AFTER PRELIMINARY FLIGHT TEST RATING HAS BEEN ACHIEVED AND A FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION COMPLETED. 3.5 ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS. AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION IS DEFINED AS A SOLUTION NOT EXPECTED TO MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED THROUGHOUT THIS RFI, BUT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES THE OVERALL PROGRAM COST. SUPPORTING RATIONALE SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH ANY ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION. EACH DET! AILED DESCRIPTION SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE ESTIMATED SAVINGS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONCEPT. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS SHOULD CLEARLY DEFINE WHICH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET. IF AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION IS RECOMMENDED, SUCH AS AN "EQUIVALENT" FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA), CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION (FAR) DESCRIPTION AND PARAGRAPH. A SOLICITATION NUMBER HAS BEEN ASSIGNED, BUT IT IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSE ONLY.