ANTENNA

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE7M526P0485 to TRIMAN INDUSTRIES INC, identified by CAGE code 0ZBE8, for the procurement of a single antenna item with NSN 5985011469284, totaling $897,449.00. The award was issued on July 13, 2026, under Solicitation SPE7M1-25-Q-0014, modified via amendment P00001 originally dated December 17, 2025, and executed under the authority of FAR 13.302(a) and FAR 12.303(a). The contract was awarded without a specified contract type, quantity, or unit price breakdown, and no option periods, CLINs, SLINs, or ELINs were detailed. Performance is expected to originate from the contractor’s location in Morristown, New Jersey, with delivery and inspection locations not explicitly defined. The paying office is DLA Land and Maritime, Maritime Supply Chain, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, with Michael Finken serving as both Contracting Officer and the designated point of contact. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical representative was identified in the documentation. The contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, under Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which was unilaterally applied via Standard Form 30 and imposes compliance obligations related to diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. No other contract clauses specific to inspection, quality assurance, packaging, marking, barcoding, or MIL-STD requirements were included or referenced. The solicitation and award process leveraged the DIBBS platform for electronic submission and post-award communication, with no mention of WAWF, IPP, or other invoicing systems. While the acquisition falls under NAICS code 334511 for Communications Equipment Manufacturing and is classified as a federal procurement by the Department of Defense, no socioeconomic status, small business size certification, or affirmative action representations were provided by the awardee. The total contract value is fixed at the awarded amount with no indication of potential adjustments, extensions, or performance incentives, and no evaluation factors or source selection criteria were disclosed in the available documentation.