BEARING, BALL, ANNULA

The contract award SPE4A626F3520, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency under solicitation SPE4A6-26-T-114E, was awarded to PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION (CAGE 59211) on July 17, 2026, for a single line item: one unit of a ball bearing, annular (NSN 3110013390641), at a total price of $65,613.60. Performance is to occur at the contractor’s location in Irvine, California, with delivery governed by the underlying delivery order SPE4A122G0007. The contracting officer is Dean Allen, affiliated with DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia, and payment is to be processed through DLA Aviation’s ASC Commodities Division. The contract is likely firm-fixed-price in structure, consistent with standard DLA procurement practices, though the contract type is not explicitly stated. No option quantities or extended pricing structures are included, and the total value reflects only the base award with no potential for additional funding. The contract incorporates the FAR clause 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which mandates contractor compliance with federal prohibitions against racially discriminatory DEI practices and requires reporting of subcontractor violations to the contracting officer. This clause flows down to all subcontracts performed within the United States, and compliance is governed by the materiality standard under 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(4). No other special requirements, such as security clearances, key personnel, or organizational conflict of interest provisions, are identified. Inspection and acceptance criteria, packaging, marking, and preservation specifications are not detailed in the documentation, and no referencing military standards like MIL-STD-129 or MIL-STD-130 are provided. Although the place of performance and contractor information are confirmed, the exact location for inspection or acceptance, FOB terms, delivery schedule, and invoicing procedures (e.g., whether WAWF is required) remain unspecified. The solicitation did not include evaluation factors, and no socioeconomic certifications or size status representations were declared by the awardee. The contract’s administrative framework is supported by documented changes, including a modification dated December 16, 2