Building Access Token Readers Relocation

The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to amend attachment 1, PWS dated 15 March 2017, and adding attachment 6, Questions and Answers. 1. This request for proposal (RFP) is to support the Defense Information System's Agency (DISA) Europe's requirement for Building Access Token Readers Relocation. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The specifics are as follows: Tracking Number: HC1021-17-T-0106 Task Order Title: Building Access Token Readers Relocation Small Business Set Aside: No Order Type: Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Period of Performance: 15 Days after award Incumbent Contractor: No Section 508 Applicable: Yes Method of Evaluation: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Performance Based: No DD254 Required: No Proposal/No Bid Due Date: 16 March 2017 at 9:00 AM EST Amendment Proposal Bid Due Date: 21 March 2017 at 9:00 AM EST REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION: LINE Item Description Quantity Unit of Issue 0001 Remove and re-install Four (4) access token readers 15 Days 2. Offerors are requested to submit a written technical and price proposal in response to the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) (Attachment 1) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)(Attachment 2). Further information on submission of technical and price proposals is provided throughout this document. SITE VISIT If the Offeror requires a site survey to view the 8 sites, one will be provided. Offerors are highly encouraged to attend a site visit. a. Site visits may be arranged by emailing the following: Name: Megan Von Bokel Email: Megan.a.vonbokel.civ@mail.mil Telephone: +49 (0)711.686.39.4544 b. Organized Site visit will be conducted from 8 through 9 March 2017 between 1400 and 1700hrs CEST. c. Participants will meet at - DISA Europe, Haupstrasse, Patch Barracks, Bldg. 2341, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. a. IAW with DISA Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DARS) 52.209-9000, each offeror shall specifically identify in its proposal, whether or not any potential or actual Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest (OCCI) as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5 exists for this procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on this procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the proposal, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided. b. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do apply to this requirement. Section 508 requirements are listed in the attached PWS (Attachment 1). An offeror's proposal shall confirm that the offeror is compliant with Section 508 standards. Any proposal failing to confirm the offeror's compliance with the Section 508 Accessibility Standards, as listed in the PWS, shall be eliminated from consideration for award. c. The following administrative requirements apply to the offerors' proposals in response to the RFP. The technical portion of the proposal shall include information regarding the offeror's ability to conform to all required terms and conditions in the solicitation. The offerors' proposals shall address all aspects of the PWS. Page limitations are identified below under each evaluation factor and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the proposal. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, OCCI mitigation plans, and Section 508 compliance. In the event any evaluation notices are issued, page limitations may also be placed on those. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1 inch margin using no smaller than an 11 point Ariel, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text to include any text contained in a table. The price proposal spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical proposal and shall be submitted in MSExcel 2007 or MSExcel 2010 format. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The total size of each email (including all attachments) shall not exceed 20MB. Email attachments shall not be submitted in a .zip file format. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered part of a proposal. The Government reserves the right not to consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFP. 3. Evaluation Factors and Basis for Award Determination: a. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government using an LPTA evaluation process. The evaluation factors and subfactors identified in paragraph 3c (1) will be used in the determination of technical acceptability. b. After receipt of proposals, the Government will first evaluate the lowest price proposal. If the lowest price proposal is determined to be technically acceptable and otherwise properly awardable, no further evaluations will be conducted, and award will be made. If, however, the lowest price proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable and/or otherwise not properly awardable, further evaluations will be conducted. c. The standards for determining technical acceptability are below, as well as information concerning price proposals. (1) Technical/Management Approach Factor: The Technical/Management Subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order for a proposal to be rated overall Technically Acceptable, each of the following subfactors must be rated Acceptable. Technical/ management proposals should not exceed 25 pages. (a) Subfactor 1: Conduct Site Survey, PWS Paragraph 6.1. In order to be considered for award conduct Site Survey and propose solutions meet requirements of the PWS. (b) Subfactor 2: Remove and install building access token readers, PWS Paragraph 6.2. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, performance will occurs with no required re-performance or re-work at least 100% of the time. Revisions that occur are minor and are resolved in a satisfactory manner. 5. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions or seek clarifications if the Contracting Officer (KO) determines they are necessary. In the event issues pertaining to a proposed task cannot be resolved to the KO's satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to withdraw and cancel the proposed task order. In such an event, offerors will be notified in writing. In the event a competitive range is established and the KO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the KO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition. 6. Attachment 5 contains provisions that apply to this solicitation and clauses that will be applicable to the resulting award. Some of the provisions require a response from the offeror and will need to be submitted along with your proposal. 7. In response to this RFP, no terms, conditions, or assumptions will be entertained. If terms, conditions, or assumptions are included in a proposal, the proposal may be excluded on grounds that it failed to comply with the RFP's instructions. 8. An offeror agrees that if its offer is accepted within 60 calendar days from the date of receipt of proposals (unless a different period is stated in the proposal), it will furnish the items and/or services identified in its proposal at the price offered to the designated point(s) within the time specified in the contract. 9. Portions of the successful offeror's proposal may be incorporated into the contract. 10. Questions should be addressed to disa.stuttgart.ditco.mbx.pl512@mail.mil. Please provide any questions, in writing, no later than March 13, 2017 at 9:00 AM (EST). The Government reserves the right to not answer questions submitted after this time. 11. Proposals are due no later than March 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM (EST) and should be submitted to the contract specialist at DITCO via the following email address: disa.stuttgart.ditco.mbx.pl512@mail.mil. Sincerely, Jeremy C. Potthast CONTRACTING OFFICER Attachment 1, PWS (Amend 0001) Attachment 2, QASP Attachment 3, CLIN Pricing Worksheet Attachment 4, Evaluation Tables Attachment 5, FAR, DFARS, DARS Provisions/Clauses Attachment 6, Questions and Answers