Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Sources Sought opportunity from Department Of Veterans Affairs was posted on June 10, 2019. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

C--528A7-18-725 DESIGN REPLACE AHUs 02, 07, 11

Awarded
36C24219R0101Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541330
New
SLED
Oso Parkway/Pacific Park Drive/Glenwood Drive Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Solicitation # 20261026016
The City of Aliso Viejo is soliciting proposals for a professional licensed consultant to provide regional traffic signal synchronization services for the Oso Parkway, Pacific Park Drive, and Glenwood Drive corridor. The project involves coordinating traffic signals across multiple jurisdictions, including the Cities of Aliso Viejo, Laguna Hills, Mission Viejo, Laguna Niguel, the County of Orange, and Caltrans, extending from Moulton Parkway to the SR-241 Northbound On-Ramp. The projected period of performance is from April 1, 2027, to September 30, 2030. The selected consultant will be responsible for providing all necessary labor, materials, and equipment to implement optimized signal timing in accordance with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan and the City's Local Signal Synchronization Plan. Proposals are due by December 2, 2026, and must be submitted as one hard copy and one electronic PDF on a USB drive, with the cost proposal in a separate sealed envelope. Award decisions will be based on a weighted evaluation of the consultant's ability and skills, character and reputation, cost reasonableness, ability to meet time requirements, financial resources, and previous experience with the vendor. The contract is governed by the laws of the State of California with venue in Orange County. Key requirements include compliance with California prevailing wage laws, adherence to the City's Minority Business Enterprise program, and the submission of annual political contribution disclosures.
City of Aliso Viejo

POSTED

about 7 hours ago

DEADLINE

in about 1 month
NAICS: 541330
New
SLED
Buckhead CID Livable Centers Initiative Master Plan
Solicitation # 2026-10
The Buckhead Community Improvement District is soliciting proposals for the Buckhead Livable Centers Initiative Master Plan, a project aimed at updating the 2017 LCI plan to improve accessibility, walkability, and transit use. The scope of work focuses on the Buckhead and Lenox MARTA station areas and their connected mixed-use districts. Key deliverables include an existing conditions assessment report, a regulatory code study and audit, and the advancement of both a central gathering place/park plan and a walkable streetscape prototype to 30 percent completion. The total budget for this project is 300,000 dollars, with payments made via monthly invoices and progress reports. The project is funded through the Atlanta Regional Commission’s Livable Centers Initiative program and must adhere to federal regulations 49 CFR Part 18 and 49 CFR Part 26 regarding competitive procurement and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise participation. Additionally, the contractor must comply with the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The performance period begins with a notice to proceed on December 21, 2026, with a project kickoff in January 2027 and a final completion deadline of November 19, 2027. Selection will be based on the consultant's qualifications, prior experience, proposed approach, and understanding of the local Buckhead context.
Buckhead Community Improvement District

POSTED

about 8 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 16 days
NAICS: 541330
New
SLED
CITY OF ALAMO FY27 CDBG SEWERAGE
Solicitation # PE-66394-NONST-2027-000000011
The City of Alamo is soliciting statements of qualifications and proposals from engineering firms licensed in the State of Georgia to provide professional services for the improvement of the city's sewerage system. The scope of work involves providing preliminary design services for a potential FY27 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project, with the requirement that a draft Preliminary Engineering Report be submitted by January 15, 2027. If funding is secured, the selected firm will also be responsible for the subsequent design and construction management services. Proposals are due by November 30, 2026, and must include the firm's history, CDBG/EIP/RDF experience, key personnel qualifications, current workload, proposed scope of service, references, and associated fees or percentages. Evaluation of respondents is based on a point system assessing the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines, experience with similar projects, quality of references, and price competitiveness. Additionally, firms must confirm they possess Errors and Omissions insurance and can meet the PER deadline. All contracts are subject to the provisions of the Georgia Department of Community Affairs and must comply with various federal and state laws regarding HUD Assisted Projects, including the Build America, Buy America Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The primary point of contact for this solicitation is Bethany Newby.
City of Alamo

POSTED

about 9 hours ago

DEADLINE

in about 1 month

AI Contract Overview

Show more

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire used by the Department of Veterans Affairs to evaluate the previous work of contractors for A/E Design projects, specifically relating to the replacement of Air Handling Units. The form is divided into sections for the contractor to provide administrative details, such as CAGE codes, contract numbers, and project descriptions, and for the client to provide a qualitative assessment of the contractor's performance. The evaluation focuses on several critical performance areas, including technical quality, schedule adherence, customer satisfaction, management capabilities, financial stability, and safety compliance. Clients rate these elements on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory and are required to provide narrative explanations for any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings. The final section of the document gathers a summary of strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies to help the government assess the performance risk associated with the firm.

General Info

Contract Value

$230,950.07

NAICS

541330 - Engineering Services

Place of Performance

NY, USA

Set-Aside

SDVOSBC

Award Issued Date

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

1 update
PhaseAwarded
Posted

Sources Sought

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Get full access to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Veterans Affairs → 242-NETWORK Contract Office 02 (36C242)
ContactsNo contacts available
OfficeALBANY, NY, 12208, USA
Office AddressALBANY, NY, 12208, USA
ContactsNo contact information available

Full Description

Show more
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Solicitation Number: Project Title: A/E Design CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4) 1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code: Address: DUNs Number: Phone Number: Email Address: Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number: 2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other Percent of project work performed: If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): 3. Contract Information Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable): Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title: Contract Location: Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences: Original Contract Price (Award Amount): Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences: 4. Project Description: Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.) CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8) 5. Client Information Name: Title: Phone Number: Email Address: 6. Describe the client s role in the project: 7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy): 8. Client s Signature: E VG S M U N Exceptional (Outstanding) Very Good (Above Average) Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Available Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective Section D: Performance Information: Choose the letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory. Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor s corrective actions appear or were ineffective No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. 1. QUALITY: a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N a.1. Comments: b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N b.1. Comments: c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N c.1. Comments: d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) E VG S M U N d.1. Comments: 2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) E VG S M U N 2.a.1 Comments: b) Rate the contractor s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N 2.b.1. Comments: 3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N 3. a.1. Comments: b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) E VG S M U N 3.b.1. Comments: c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N 3.c.1. Comments: d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N 3.d.1 Comments: 4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N 4.a.1. Comments: b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N 4.b.1 Comments: c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N 4.c.1. Comments: d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N 4.d.1. Comments: e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N 4.e.1. Comments: f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N 4.f.1. Comments: g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes E VG S M U N 4.g.1. Comments: h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N 4.h.1. Comments: 5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N 5.a.1. Comments: b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client E VG S M U N 5.b.1. Comments: c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) E VG S M U N 5.c.1. Comments: d) Is the Contractor s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No 5.d.1. Comments: e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. Yes No 5.e.1. Comments: f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No 5.f.1 Comments: 6. SAFETY/SECURITY a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) E VG S M U N 6.a.1 Comments: b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N 6.b.1. Comments: 7. GENERAL a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). E VG S M U N 7.a.1. Comments: b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N 7.b.1. Comments: c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No 7.c.1. Comments: d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N 7.d.1. Comments: Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________STRENGTHS:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________WEAKNESSES:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DEFICIENCIES:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ COMMENTS:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Past Performance Information provided by: __________________________________________________ (Printed Name) Signature: ________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Organization: _____________________________________ Phone: ____________________________ -

More opportunities from Department Of Veterans Affairs → 242-NETWORK Contract Office 02 (36C242)

Same awarding agency

Earlier notices in this NAICS code

Posted before this notice, open and closed

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS