CASE, PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT

The contract, awarded to PELICAN PRODUCTS, INC. under contract number SPE8EN26D0001 with order SPE8EN26F3461, is a firm fixed-price agreement for the delivery of photographic equipment cases identified by NSN 6760015009633, with a total contract value of $6,548.20. The award was issued on July 31, 2026, and the items are to be delivered within 30 days of award under F.O.B. origin terms, with Government inspection and acceptance occurring at the destination. Extensive packaging and labeling requirements mandate compliance with MIL-STD-129, including bold external markings stating “Product Verification Test Samples – Do Not Post to Stock,” along with the contract number and lot/item number, all adjacent to standard MIL-STD-129 markings. Interior packaging must include hard copies of the contract, material certifications, process operation sheets, manufacturing drawings, and return shipping information, with the system of record receiving report serving as the packing list per DFARS Appendix F. The contract includes numerous FAR and DFARS clauses governing compliance, accountability, and ethical standards, such as prohibitions on Russian fossil fuel operations, Buy American Act certifications, cyber incident reporting under DFARS 252.204-7012, CUI safeguarding, trafficking in persons prevention, paid sick leave compliance, and small business subcontracting obligations. The contractor is required to use WAWF for all invoicing and electronic submissions, and all documentation must adhere to specified federal acquisition standards, including sustainable procurement practices under EPA SNAP and BioPreferred guidelines. The solicitation referenced a base value of $1,000 and a maximum ceiling of $24,300,000, though the current order reflects a small initial delivery. The contractor’s representations, certifications, and socioeconomic status are to be completed but remain unfilled in the provided data, and no specific subcontracting plan thresholds or evaluation weights are documented, indicating the award was likely based on price and compliance under a simplified acquisition threshold process.