CASE, PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE8EN26F3365 to PELICAN PRODUCTS, INC. on July 28, 2026, under the existing indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract SPE8EN26D0001, for the delivery of photographic equipment cases identified by NSN 6760014912706. The contract has a total value of $127.13, though the overall ceiling for the base IDIQ is $24,300,000 with a minimum guaranteed value of $25,000 across multiple CLINs. The items are subject to strict packaging and marking requirements mandated by MIL-STD-129, including bold labeling of "Product Verification Test Samples - Do Not Post to Stock," contract number, and lot/item number adjacent to standard identification markings. Shipping is governed by FOB Origin terms, with inspection and acceptance occurring at the destination, and delivery must be completed within 30 days of contract award. Payment is processed through WAWF using the provided DoDAAC codes, with invoicing restricted to electronic submission per clause 252.232-7006. The contract incorporates a comprehensive set of FAR and DFARS clauses governing compliance, cybersecurity, ethical conduct, and supply chain security. Mandatory provisions include safeguarding covered defense information under DFARS 252.204-7012 with a deviation for 2024-O0013, compliance with NIST SP 800-171, antiterrorism awareness training, and prohibitions on hardware and services from Kaspersky Lab, Huawei, ZTE, and ByteDance. The contractor must adhere to whistleblower protections, code of business ethics, and prohibitions on inverted domestic corporations. Small business set-asides are active with multiple alternates in place under FAR 52.219-6, -7, -9, and -13, and accelerated payments to small business subcontractors are required. Cyber incident reporting must occur within 72 hours through the DIBNET portal, and third-party cyber information is protected under strict non-disclosure rules. All representations and certifications are embedded in contract clauses, including disclosures for UEI and CAGE codes, socioeconomic status, and potential delinquent tax obligations. No specific evaluation factors are articulated, and while attachments suggest a signed vendor