Psst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveCLEATUS Webinar: AI for Government Contracting — Free Webinar — Wednesday, July 22 at 2:00 PM EDT

Register Free →

Get CLEATUSFree Trial

Get CLEATUSFree Trial

Search

Top

Back to Contracts

Downtown Master Plan Request for Qualificaitons

Active

26-06State & Local

Response Deadline07/27/2026, 11:00:00 PM UTC

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

AI Contract Overview

Show more

The City of Moab is seeking qualified professionals to develop a consolidated Downtown Master Plan by synthesizing existing studies and plans into a unified vision for the downtown corridor, aligned with the City’s FY 2027 Strategic Plan priority of adopting and beginning implementation of an updated downtown vision. The request for qualifications, identified as Solicitation Number 26-06, was posted on July 13, 2026, with a submission deadline of July 27, 2026, and is open to firms with demonstrated expertise in urban planning, community engagement, and master planning. Proposals must demonstrate the ability to integrate disparate data sources into a cohesive, actionable plan that reflects community goals and supports long-term economic and physical development of the downtown area. All submissions should be directed to Val Veilleux at aveilleux@moabcity.gov, and the full solicitation can be accessed via the provided online portal. The plan will be presented for adoption by the City Council and will serve as the guiding document for future investments and improvements in the downtown district.

General Info

Moab seeks qualified firms to create a unified Downtown Master Plan aligned with FY 2027 strategic goals by July 27, 2026.

Agency

UtahView Agency

NAICS

925120 - Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural DevelopmentView NAICS

Place of Performance

UT, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

(1)

RFQ 26-06 Downtown Master Plan Update for City of Moab

PDF•rfq

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Sign up to view the full breakdown with detailed analysis of each section.

Timeline

PhaseSolicitation

PostedJul 13

Solicitation

Response DeadlineJul 27

Submission deadline

Response Deadline

07/27/2026, 11:00:00 PM UTCin 13 days

Ready to pursue this opportunity?

Start your free trial to track this contract, build proposals with AI assistance, and manage your pipeline.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more

AgencyUtah

Contacts1 person available

OfficeUT, USA

Organization / Agency

Utah

View Agency Profile

Office AddressUT, USA

Contacts

Val Veilleux

contact@example.gov

Full Description

Show more

The City of Moab seeks statements of qualifications (SOQs) from professionals to collate existing studies and plans to generate a consolidated Downtown Master Plan for City Council adoption. This effort supports the City's FY 2027 Strategic Plan priority of adopting and initiating implementation of an updated vision for the downtown corridor.

Similar Contracts

Master Application (MA) No. MA26171 (SDP26064)The City of Jurupa Valley has issued a Site Development Permit under Master Application MA26171 for a home-based business located in an R-3 zoning area, permitting residential property use for occupational purposes while maintaining compatibility with surrounding residential character. The application, posted on July 13, 2026, is part of the city's planning and environmental review process under CEQA, with the project site situated within the 92509 zip code in Jurupa Valley, California. Primary contacts for the application include Colin Duffy, Planning Intern, and Kevin P Carr, MS, CEQA Administrator, both reachable through the city’s planning department, while Daniela Diaz Gonzalez, the property owner, is also listed as a point of contact for project-specific inquiries. All correspondence and documentation for this permit are managed through the city’s planning and environmental compliance framework, with the official project portal accessible via the provided CEQAnet link. The permit does not involve a formal solicitation or set-aside program and remains under local municipal oversight with no federal or state funding indicators. The focus is on ensuring that the proposed home occupation adheres to land use regulations, environmental thresholds, and neighborhood guidelines applicable to R-3 residential zones, with the city’s planning team responsible for review and approval.

City of Jurupa Valley

POSTED

DEADLINE

Mahalee Lodge Planned Development Zone & General Plan Designation ReversionsThe development agreement for Mahalee Lodge has expired due to the absence of any construction or developmental activity within the required 24-month period following approval, triggering a mandatory review under Alpine County Code 18.28.100. As a result, the Planning Commission is obligated to initiate formal proceedings to revert the property’s zoning designation and general plan status to their prior conditions, effectively nullifying the special planned development status previously granted. This reversion process is now the County’s administrative priority, with no current solicitation or active procurement underway, but the case is formally flagged for action as of July 2026. The Alpine County Community Development Department, led by Sam Booth and Sarah Traiman, is responsible for managing the reversion process and will oversee compliance with local land use regulations through the Planning Commission’s procedural requirements. All relevant documentation and updates are publicly accessible via the CEQA Net portal linked to the project.

POSTED

DEADLINE

ZF# 2026-013 (Campbell Use Permit for Third Residential Unit)Yolo County is seeking a use permit to legalize the construction of a third residential unit on a 22-acre agricultural zoned parcel located in the unincorporated area near Winters, California, bringing the total number of dwelling units on the property to three. The proposed unit measures 781 square feet and is part of a request to bring existing structures into compliance with local land use regulations. The project is filed under ZF# 2026-013 and was posted on July 10, 2026, with the primary point of contact being Tracy Gonzalez, Associate Planner, who can be reached via email or phone for inquiries. The applicant and property owners, Ryan and Michele Campbell, are also listed as contacts and are actively involved in the permit process. The property is situated in a rural, agriculturally zoned area, which introduces specific regulatory considerations for residential development, including adherence to agricultural preservation standards and potential restrictions related to density and building scale. The permit request aims to formalize an existing structure and ensure compliance with county code requirements. Interested parties may review further details through the provided California Environmental Quality Act network link, which offers public access to environmental and planning documents related to the proposal. The process is administrative in nature and does not involve procurement or federal contracting mechanisms.

POSTED

DEADLINE

Cabazon Infrastructure Plan and Cabazon Community Plan Project (GPA No. 01206 and ZR6234)The Cabazon Community Plan and Cabazon Infrastructure Plan aim to guide substantial growth in the Cabazon area over the next three decades, accommodating up to 22,888 new housing units and nearly 49.5 million square feet of non-residential development. Aligned with the 6th Cycle Housing Element Action H-27, the Community Plan updates land use designations to support denser residential patterns, expanded commercial and industrial zones, public facilities, and preserved open spaces while addressing key community priorities such as placemaking, accessibility, design standards, and implementation frameworks. The plan transitions from current mixed and low-density uses to include higher density residential, heavy industrial, and additional mixed-use areas, reflecting anticipated urbanization and economic expansion. The accompanying Infrastructure Plan outlines the necessary upgrades and expansions to support this growth, covering domestic water supply, wastewater treatment, flood control, electric power, natural gas distribution, telecommunications, and roadway right-of-way improvements. These infrastructure components are critical to ensuring public services can meet the demands of a significantly larger population and economy. The project is being advanced by Riverside County through coordinated planning efforts, with primary contact managed by the District 5 Principal Planner and a dedicated project manager, and is positioned for environmental review to validate compliance with growth obligations and resource capacity requirements across the 92230 ZIP Code area.

Riverside County

POSTED

DEADLINE

High School 5The City of Irvine is proposing a master plan modification to the previously approved Master Plan 00956311-PMP for a residential development in District 2, focusing on architectural refinements to select product types, adjustments to private street circulation, and site landscaping improvements. The plan includes replacing one approved residential product type with another similar detached unit type while preserving the overall mix of attached and detached condominium units. The total number of units remains unchanged at 474, ensuring no increase or decrease in density or scale. This modification is intended to enhance design quality and site functionality without altering the fundamental approved layout or unit count. The project is managed by the City of Irvine, with Hernan DeSantos, Senior Planner, listed as the primary point of contact, and Kory Lynch of Five Point as the project applicant. The plan is associated with a public record under the CEQA Net database with project ID 2002101020 and is posted as a forecast with a November 2026 date. No contract value, pricing, delivery terms, inspection requirements, legal clauses, or detailed performance specifications are included in the available documentation, and no formal FAR sections, attachments, or evaluation criteria have been provided, indicating that this is a preliminary planning modification under local jurisdiction rather than a federally funded procurement requiring full contractual structure.

POSTED

DEADLINE