ENVELOPE,POWER UNIT

This is a Sources Sought Notice and is for information purposes only. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, QUOTATIONS, OR BIDS. All of the following information is approximate and may be altered in the actual solicitation. Responses to this sources sought announcement will be used by the Government to make appropriate acquisition decisions. DLA Land and Maritime anticipates issuing a solicitation in the near future for approximately 500 each of NSN 6115-01-566-9209, Envelope, Power Unit, on Solicitation Number SPE7M216R0062. Item is to be manufactured I/A/W PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION DBA 05448 P/N 644308 WOMACK MACHINE SUPPLY CO. OF 1SV90 P/N 1510089 The following applies: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ENVELOPE,POWER UNIT Configuration Change Management - Engineering Change Proposal, Requests for Variance (Deviation or Waiver) February 2015 1. Requirements A. The Configuration Change Management section of SAE EIA-649-1 Configuration Management Requirement for Defense Contracts, Paragraph 3.3, shall be used for Configuration Control of material purchased under this contract. B. Furnished item(s) shall conform to the approved configuration requirements/revision specified, unless a Pre-Production Request for Variance (deviation) or a Post-Production Request for Variance (waiver), is processed and approved as provided by Paragraph 3. in this Standard Text Object (STO). Hereafter, the term "Request for Variance (RFV)" will also include Requests for Deviations and Waivers. 2. The definitions from EIA-649-1 apply to items being procured under this solicitation/contract, with the following clarification of Deviation & Waiver: A. Pre-Production RFV (previously known as deviation) requests permission to produce a product that does not conform to contract requirements/documentation for a limited amount of time and for specified effectivity. (A deviation differs from an engineering change in that an approved engineering change requires corresponding revision of the item's current approved configuration documentation, whereas a deviation does not.). B. Post-Production RFV (previously known as waiver) requests approval of product found during manufacture, or after having been submitted for Government inspection or acceptance, that departs from specified requirements, but nevertheless is considered suitable for use "as is" or after repair by an approved method. 3. Contractor responsibilities. A. An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) is used to make permanent changes in the Government technical data package (TDP). Pending approval of an ECP, contractual relief should be requested in writing by the Contractor using a RFV. B. Refer to FAR Part 48 Value Engineering for cost saving improvements to the Technical Data Package (TDP). C. All ECPs submitted by the Contractor will be deemed routine. If the Contractor considers an ECP as an emergency or urgent; they shall include in their ECP submittal an explanation and all applicable supporting documentation. All ECPs will be reviewed for a determination on criticality, and, if concurred to be an emergency, the appropriate processing time-frame negotiated with the ESAs will be followed and the Contractor will be notified of anticipated response time. D. For ECPs, Specification Change Notices (SCNs) or RFV, the PID Text Contractor must submit the applicable documentation listed in sub-paragraphs D.(1) through D.(4)to the Administrative Contracting Officer(ACO), with an information copy to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). Failure to submit a complete legible package may result in return of the ECP/RFV without processing. (1) Documentation listed in Paragraph 3.3.1 (for ECPs), 3.3.2 (RFV), 3.3.3 (for SCNs) or 3.3.4 (for Notices of Revision (NORs)) of the latest revision of EIA-649-1. (2) DD Form 1692 (current revision) for ECP. (3) DD Form 1694 (current revision) for RFV. (4) DD Form 1695 (current revision) for NOR. 4. DLA's responsibilities: A. Upon receipt of the ECP or RFV, the PCO will ensure that the applicable product specialist receives the copy from DCMA. B. Within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of the Contractor's ECP or RFV from DCMA, the PS must submit the requests and any supporting documentation via a 339 to the appropriate Engineering Support Activity (ESA), when applicable. C. Routine ECPs will be processed within 90 days from receipt by the ESA. RFVs will be evaluated and processed within 30 days from receipt by the ESA or as negotiated with the ESA. (1) The contractor will be notified in writing of approval by the return of an approved copy of the ECP or RFV. Approval will be reflected by signature of the contracting activity or a review activity specifically identified in the contract. (2) The contractor will be notified in writing of disapproval including reason(s) for disapproval. 5. For an approved RFV or an approved ECP, when the request affects the Contract, a modification will be issued to the contract incorporating the applicable requirement changes. Only a Contracting Officer is authorized to issue a modification incorporating the approved RFV and/or ECP. 6. Questions regarding the status of previously submitted ECP or RFV should be directed to the PCO. 7. The submission of an ECP or RFV by the Contractor does not affect the required delivery date of the contract. If a delivery date change is needed, it must be negotiated with the Contracting Officer and documented via modification to the contract. 8. The period of time for evaluation and approval/disapproval of an ECP and/or a RFV, as specified in Paragraph 4. C., shall not constitute excusable delay in the performance of this Contract by the Contractor or in any way relieve the contractor from compliance with the contract delivery schedule. The submission of an ECP and/or RFV by the Contractor shall not preclude the Government from exercising its rights under any clause of the Contract. NOTE: THIS IS A RESTRICTED SOURCE ITEM AND REQUIRES ENGINEERING SOURCE APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNMENT DESIGN CONTROL ACTIVITY. ALTERNATE OFFEROR REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MIL-T-31000. (A) ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR MANUFACTURE. (B) PROCESS/OPERATION SHEETS WHICH DESCRIBE IN DETAIL EACH CRITICAL PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA. (C) IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES WHO WILL PERFORM CRITICAL PROCESSES/OPERATIONS, INCLUDING SOURCES OF FORGINGS AND CASTINGS. (D) IF AVAILABLE COPIES OF PURCHASE ORDERS FROM THE ITEM. (E) A SHOCK EXTENSION REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MIL-S-901 AND IN A FORMAT AS SPECIFIED IN DI-ENVR-80706 IS REQUIRED. IF THE OEM'S DETAILED DRAWINGS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, THE OFFEROR MUST SUPPLY AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS REPORT WHICH DETAILS HOW THEIR DRAWINGS WERE DEVELOPED. ADDITIONALLY, IF REVERSE ENGINEERING WAS USED, THE COMPLETE PROCEDURE WILL BE REPORTED INCLUDING: NUMBER OF SAMPLES, METHODS AND MEASURES USED, ALL DATA COMPILED, RATIONALE FOR DIMENSION TOLERANCE DEVIATION, AND RATIONALE FOR ACCEPTANCE. THIS DATA WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEERING SUPPORT ACTIVITY FOR EVALUATION. 52.246-11 Higher Level Contract Quality Requirement (Manufacturers) A QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ISO 9001:2008; A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO ISO 9001:2008 (EX. SAE AS 9100), THE FOLLOWING TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008; OR A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO THE TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008 (EX. SAE AS 9003) IS REQUIRED. DLA AVIATION TAILORED HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY CLAUSE FROM ISO 9001:2008 4 Quality management system 4.1 General requirements, [excluding reference to 1.2 and excluding NOTE 3 c)] 4.2 Documentation requirements 4.2.1 General 4.2.2 Quality manual, [excluding reference to 1.2] 4.2.3 Control of documents 4.2.4 Control of records 5.1 Management commitment 5.2 Customer focus 5.3 Quality policy 6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness 7.1 Planning of product realization, [excluding NOTE 2] 7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product 7.2.3 Customer communication 7.3.7 Control of design and development changes 7.4.3 Verification of purchased product 7.5.1 Control of production and service provision 7.5.3 Identification and traceability 7.5.4 Customer property 7.5.5 Preservation of product 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment 8.2.1 Customer satisfaction 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product 8.3 Control of nonconforming product 8.5.2 Corrective action 8.5.3 Preventive action MERCURY OR MERCURY CONTAINING COMPOUNDS SHALL NOT BE INTENTIONALLY ADDED TO<(>,<)> OR COME IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH<(>,<)> ANY HARDWARE OR SUPPLIES FURNISHED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. EXCEPTION: FUNCTIONAL MERCURY USED IN BATTERIES, FLUORESCENT LIGHTS, REQUIRED INSTRUMENTS; SENSORS OR CONTROLS; WEAPON SYSTEMS; AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS REAGENTS SPECIFIED BY NAVSEA. PORTABLE FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND PORTABLE INSTRUMENTS CONTAINING MERCURY SHALL BE SHOCK PROOF AND CONTAIN A SECOND BOUNDARY OF CONTAINMENT OF THE MERCURY OR MERCURY COMPOUND. (IAW NAVSEA 5100-003D). WHEN THE PURCHASE ORDER TEXT (POT) DESCRIBES THE REQUIRED PRODUCT(S) BY NAME AND PART NUMBER OF A SPECIFIC ENTITY, BY THE NAMES AND PART NUMBERS OF A NUMBER OF SPECIFIC ENTITIES, OR BY THE NAME(S) AND PART NUMBER(S) OF SPECIFIC ENTITY/ENTITIES AS MODIFIED BY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE POT ONLY THAT/THOSE PRODUCT(S) HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE GOVERNMENT AND ARE ACCEPTABLE. SUCH PRODUCT(S) ARE EXACT PRODUCT(S) AS DEFINED IN DLAD 52.217-9002, CONDITIONS FOR EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS FOR PART NUMBERED ITEMS. A VENDOR OFFER/QUOTATION, BID WITHOUT EXCEPTION, IS A CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXACT PRODUCT, MANUFACTURED AND/OR SUPPLIED BY ONE OF THE ENTITIES CITED IN THE POT WILL BE FURNISHED UNDER THE CONTRACT OR ORDER. ANY PRODUCT NOT MANUFACTURED AND/OR SUPPLIED BY ONE OF THE ENTITIES CITED IN THE POT IS AN ALTERNATE PRODUCT, EVEN THOUGH IT MIGHT BE MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWING(S) AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS OF ONE OF THE ENTITIES CITED IN THE POT. IF AN ALTERNATE PRODUCT IS FURNISHED UNDER A CONTRACT OR ORDER FOR AN EXACT PRODUCT, THE ALTERNATE PRODUCT WILL BE AN UNAUTHORIZED SUBSTITUTION, AND MAY YIELD CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN ADDITION TO ANY CIVIL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE GOVERNMENT. PKGING DATA-QUP:001 SHALL BE PACKAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 3951. Markings Paragraph When ASTM D3951, Commercial Packaging is specified, the following apply: ,,All Section "D" Packaging and Marking Clauses take precedence over ASTM D3951. ,,In addition to requirements in MIL-STD-129, when Commercial Packaging is used, the Method of Preservation for all MIL-STD-129 marking and labeling shall be "CP" Commercial Pack. ,,The Unit of Issue (U/I) and Quantity per Unit Pack (QUP) as specified in the contract take precedence over QUP in ASTM D3951. Items are to be delivered to New Cumberland PA 17070. The solicitation is anticipated to require F.O B origin I/A/W First Destination Transportation and inspection of the supplies and packaging at destination. All interested parties are invited to express your interest in this procurement by completing the attached Market Survey and returning to the buyer, Jana M Engels-Stinson, at contact@example.gov on or before 6/13/16.