Life Care Planning Services for CICP Reconsideration Panel

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is contemplating issuance of a Blanket Purchase Agreement pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Part 12and 13. The purpose of this procurement is to purchase life care planning services for the CICP Reconsideration Panel. The Government anticipates issuing a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for this requirement, with the ability to issue firm-fixed price, or time and materials type BPA Call Orders. The anticipated period performance is one (1) 12 month base period from date of award and four (4) 12 month option periods`. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for this requirement is 541990, All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services. THIS IS A COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORMAT IN SUBPART 12.6, AS SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONSTITUTES THE ONLY SOLICITATION; PROPOSALS ARE BEING REQUESTED AND A WRITTEN SOLICITATION WILL NOT BE ISSUED. This solicitation is a Request for Quotation (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect though Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-78. This is a 100% Total Small Business Set Aside. The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 541990, All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services with a small business size standard of $15.0 M. PRICE QUOTE INSTRUCTIONS The Offeror's Price Quote shall consist of the following sections: 1. Standard Form 18, Request for Quotations The contractor must complete the following Blocks: BLOCK 8 State the Name and Address of your organization. BLOCK 11 Enter the organization's Tax ID Number or Federal Identification Number; Enter the organization's DUNS (Digital Universal Numbering System) number. This information can be obtained from your accounting office; however, if your organization does not have a DUNS number, please call Duns & Bradstreet at +1 (555) 000-0000 to obtain a DUNS number. BLOCK 13 State the name and address of the individual providing the price Quote. BLOCK 14 Signature of the person authorized to commit your organization to the contract. BLOCK 16 Print or type the name and title of the person authorized to commit your organization to the contract. PRICE QUOTE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION The Offeror shall provide the following pricing chart in for a Base Period and four (4) Option Periods. Labor categories and hourly rates shall be submitted as follows. Please provide and indicate proposed discounts. Base Period Labor Category Hourly Rate _____________ __________ Option Period I Labor Category Hourly Rate _____________ ___________ Option Period II Labor Category Hourly Rate _____________ __________ Option Period III Labor Category Hourly Rate _____________ __________ Option Period IV Labor Category Hourly Rate _____________ __________ STATEMENT OF WORK COUNTERMEASURES INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM RECONSIDERATION PANEL LIFE CARE PLANNER BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) JANUARY 5 2015 I. BACKGROUND The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) within the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA), Healthcare Systems Bureau administers the compensation program specified by the CICP Administrative Implementation, Final Rule, and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act). The PREP Act authorizes compensation to individuals thought to be seriously injured by countermeasures such as vaccines, drugs, biologics, or medical devices defined in PREP Act declarations that are administered or used for pandemic, epidemic, or security threats pursuant to section 319 F-3(b) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 U.S.C. 247 d-6 d). Declarations issued by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) specify the categories of health threats or conditions for which countermeasures are recommended, the time period that liability protections are in effect, the population of individuals protected, and the geographic areas for which the protections are in effect. II. PURPOSE The contractor shall provide all labor and materials to provide detailed review and comments regarding the adequacy of documentation submitted by persons requesting benefits under the CICP, whose benefits have been denied, and who are seeking reconsideration. A description of available benefits may be found in the CICP Administrative Implementation, Final Rule, Subpart D (110.30-110.33) http://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/about/forms/admininterimfinalrule101510.pdf. The contractor's life care planning expertise and recommendations will support the work of the CICP Reconsideration Panel. III. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The BPA shall have one (1) 12 month base period and four (4) 12 month option periods. The primary place of performance will be the contractor's facility. IV. SPECIFIC TASKS The contractor shall provide all labor and materials to accomplish the specific tasks listed. Task 1: Obtain and review the case file from the Chair of the CICP Reconsideration Panel. The case file will include the request for benefits package, medical records, and other relevant documentation. Task 2: Consult on the case with the Chair of the CICP Reconsideration Panel and assigned Vocational Counselor. Task 3: Provide a detailed written review of the case file and comments regarding the adequacy of documentation submitted by persons requesting benefits under the CICP, whose benefits have been denied, and who are seeking reconsideration. The written review shall be provided to the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) 15 business days after the receipt of the case file. The written review should include an overview of the case documentation reviewed, the recommended action(s) on the case, and the justification for the recommendations. After approval from the COR, the written review will be provided to the CICP Reconsideration Panel in advance of their discussions. Task 4: As a non-voting member, participate in the CICP Reconsideration Panel meeting discussions by phone. The contractor will only be involved in Reconsideration Panel meetings when a request for reconsideration of a benefits package is being reviewed. Task 5: Review and provide written comments on the draft Report of Findings provided by the Chair of the CICP Reconsideration Panel within 10 business days of receipt of the draft. The draft Report of Findings shall include an overview of the case documentation reviewed and any other materials submitted by the Panel members, a synopsis of the Panel's discussion, and the recommended action(s) on the case. Task 6: Respond within three (3) business days to any inquiries from the Associate Administrator of HSB. Task7: Return, shred, or destroy all records within two (2) days after written notification and approval from the COR. Task 8: Comply with the following requirements regarding protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and Personal Health Information (PHI): - PII/PHI, or other sensitive information, shall not be shared with third-parties, unless given advanced written permission from the COR. - PII/PHI shall not be stored on removable/portable computing devices (e.g., laptops, thumb drives, PDAs) or transmitted via email unless encrypted with a FIPS 140-2 compliant encryption solution approved in advance by the COR. - PII/PHI shall not be stored on all computing devices. - Personal computing devices shall have antivirus software with the latest updates and anti-spyware and personal firewalls installed and enabled - Actual or potential security violations and privacy breaches shall be reported to the COR immediately upon discovery. V. SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES The Contract Work Item references the requirements identified in the Statement of Work. The format of the deliverables will be specified in each BPA Call Order. This is a sample of the deliverables that will be required for each BPA Call Order. The deliverables will be identified on each individual call order. DELIVERABLES Item Contract Work Item Description Quantity Due Date 1 Written Review A detailed written review of the case file and comments regarding the adequacy of the submitted documentation in accordance with Section IV, Task 3 One Specified in each BPA Call Order (15 business days after the receipt of the case file.) 2 Participation in Case Discussions Participation in case discussions in accordance with Section IV, Task 4 As directed by the COR Specified in each BPA Call Order 3 Written Response to Draft Report of Findings Written response to draft Report of Findings provided by the Chair of the CICP Reconsideration Panel in accordance with Section IV, task 5 One Specified in each BPA Call Order (10 business days after receipt of the draft.) FAR 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (APR 2014), APPLIES TO THIS ACQUISITION AND ADDENDA TO THIS PROVISION ARE INCLUDED. INSTRUCTIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS OR QUOTERS General Instructions A. To facilitate the evaluations, two (2) volumes title technical proposal and price proposal shall be submitted separately and clearly labeled. Each of these parts shall be separate and complete in itself so that the evaluation of one may be accomplished independently of the evaluation of the other. Volume I-Technical Proposal must not contain references to price; however, resource information such as data concerning labor hours and categories, materials, subcontracts, etc., must be contained in the Technical Proposal so that your understanding of the statement of work may be evaluated. It must disclose your approach in sufficient detail to provide a clear and concise presentation that includes the requirements of the proposal instructions. Volume I must include a statement indicating whether any exceptions are taken to the terms and conditions of the Request for Task Order Proposal (RFTOP) as part of the transmittal letter. Any exceptions must include identification of the specific paragraphs and rationale for each exception. Exceptions shall also be noted in the proposal at the location of the exception. Volume Title I Technical Proposal II Price Proposal B. Technical Proposal shall be submitted electronically in the following format: single spaced on 8.5 x 11 inch paper orientation containing text no smaller than 12 pitch/10 point. Each page shall be numbered and each volume shall be tabbed to correspond to the table of contents. Offerors may include 11 x 17 inch paper orientation only to display graphics, flow charts, organizational charts, or drawings. C. Where data/information appears in one part, it does not have to be repeated in any other part. However, it shall be cross referenced by indicating the specific location including the volume and page number as a minimum. The clarity, relevance, and conciseness of the proposal is important. The page limit for each volume is 25 pages. Note: The Resumes are not counted as part of this page limit and shall be provided as appendices in the technical proposal. D. The proposal must be signed by an official authorized to bind your organization. Please submit the Technical Proposal Volume and Price Proposal Volume in separate files. Please submit one (1) original proposal in Adobe PDF format to the following e-mail address: Tim Corrigan contact@example.gov E. The RFQ does not commit the Government to pay any cost for the preparation and submission of a proposal. In addition, the Contracting Officer is the only individual who can legally commit the Government to the expenditure of public funds in connection with this proposed acquisition. Technical Quote Instructions To facilitate the technical quote evaluation, the offeror shall submit as part of the RFQ, a separate enclosure entitles, "Technical Quote." The data and information should be keyed to each paragraph of the Technical Quote requirements as outlined below. 1. Technical Approach 2. Personnel 3. Organizational Experience 4. Past Performance EVALUATION Award Criteria The technical factors when combined are significantly more important than the price factor. However, if two or more proposals are approximately technically equal then price becomes more important. In any event, the Government reserves the right to make an award to the best advantage of the Government, price, and other factors considered. Selection of Offerors 1. The acceptability or unacceptability of the technical quote will be based upon a technical evaluation. Each quote will be evaluated in strict conformity with the RFQ, utilizing point scores and written critiques. 2. The Government reserves the right to make an award without further discussion of the quotes received. Therefore, it is important that your quote be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from both the technical and cost standpoints. 3. The Government reserves the right to make a single award, multiple awards, or no award as a result of this RFQ. In addition, the RFQ may be amended if determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Evaluation Criteria Weights The evaluation will be based on the demonstrated capabilities of the prospective contractor in relation to the needs of the project as set forth in the RFQ. The following criteria are those that will be applied in the evaluation of your technical quote. The proposal will be evaluated using the following criteria and weights. Evaluation Criteria Points a. Technical Approach 45 b. Personnel 40 c. Organizational Experience 10 d. Past Performance 5 Technical Evaluation Criteria Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program Reconsideration Panel Life Care Planner Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) I. Technical Approach (45 points) The proposed technical approach shall demonstrate an understanding of the requirements specified in the Statement of Work (SOW). It shall contain the following: a. The Offeror shall explain, in its own words, its understanding of the requirements in detail. b. The Offeror's proposal shall be written in a comprehensive, uniform, and grammatically accurate manner. c. The Offeror shall fully describe the proposed technical approach to meet each of the tasks, and respective subtasks in the SOW. The technical approach should include a discussion of anticipated major problem areas and potential approaches for their solution. II. Personnel (40 points) The Offeror shall indicate the names, educational preparation, number of years of experience, and types of professional experience of contractor personnel that will be working on this contract. Resumes for all personnel must be submitted and shall indicate the labor categories/positions that persons within the organization will occupy for this project along with their key functions. The Offeror should delineate the staff's competence and demonstrated experience in the skills necessary for the requirements in this SOW. Contractor staff performing on this contract must have a current certification as either a Certified Life Care Planner (CLCP) or a Certified Nurse Life Care Planner (CNLCP) and evidence of two (2) years' life care planning or review of life care plan experience within the past 5 years. III. Organizational Experience (10 Points) The Offeror shall demonstrate the organization's experience in successfully managing contracts involving life care planning services or the review of life care plans. The Offeror must demonstrate a minimum of two (2) years' experience within the past 5 years. IV. Past Performance (5) The Offeror shall be responsible for requesting three (3) written professional references to submit to the Contract Specialist. The contractor shall not submit more than three (3) references. The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any source. The Offeror's past performance will be evaluated in conjunction with the technical review. The overall total score for the past performance rating for each Offeror will be determined by calculating the average of the surveys received. The overall total score will be rounded to the nearest whole number to assign an appropriate adjectival rating (0 = Unsatisfactory, 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Excellent, 5 = Outstanding). The elements being rated are as follows: Quality of Product or Service Unsatisfactory- Non-conformances is jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. Poor - Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Fair - Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Good - There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. Excellent - There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government. Outstanding - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". Cost Control Unsatisfactory - Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, this level of ability to manage cost issues constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards. Poor - Ability to manage cost issues requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Fair - Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Good - There are no, or very minimal, cost management issues and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. Excellent - There are no cost management issues and the Contractor has exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the Government. Outstanding - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where the contractor achieved cost savings and performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". Timeliness of Performance Unsatisfactory-Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards. Poor-Delays require significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Fair-Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Good-There are no, or minimal, delays that impact achievement of contract requirements. Excellent-There are no delays and the contractor has exceeded the agreed upon time schedule. Outstanding-The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". Business Relations Unsatisfactory-Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is not effective. If not substantially mitigated or corrected it should constitute a significant impediment in considerations for future awards. Poor - Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is marginally effective. Fair-Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective. Good-Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is consistently effective. Excellent-Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues exceeds Government expectation. Outstanding-The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". The evaluation will be based on the demonstrated capabilities of the prospective contractor in relation to the needs of the project as set forth in the RFQ. The merits of the proposal will be evaluated carefully. The technical factors are significantly more important than price. The following criteria and assigned weight for each criterion will be applied in the evaluation of your Technical Proposal: Evaluation Criteria Points a. Technical Approach 45 b. Personnel 40 c. Organizational Experience 10 d. Past Performance 5 Total 100 Price proposal will be evaluated for total price and reasonableness of the requirements. 1. Reasonableness. Normally, competition establishes price reasonableness. In limited situations, additional analysis will be required by the Government to determine reasonableness. If, after receipt of a proposal, the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition does not exist for the efforts and a determination is made that none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1(b) apply, the Offeror shall be required to provide data other than certified cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-3. Administrative information submitted will be evaluated for completeness. All offerors shall include a completed copy of the provision at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items (MAY 2014), with its offer. FAR 52.212-4 (ALTERNATE I MAY 2014) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2014) Applies To This Acquisition. FAR 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2014) (a) The Contractor shall comply with the following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, which are incorporated in this contract by reference, to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: (1) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (Dec 2014) (2) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009) (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). ___Alternate I (Aug 2007) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). (3) 52.233-3, Protest After Award (AUG 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553). (4) 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004)"(Public Laws 108-77 and 108-78 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note)). (b) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (b) that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: XX (1) 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with Alternate I (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 4704 and 10 U.S.C. 2402). __ (2) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (Apr 2010) (41 U.S.C. 3509)). __ (3) 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (June 2010) (Section 1553 of Pub. L. 111-5). (Applies to contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.) XX (4) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jul 2013) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note). __ (5) [Reserved]. __ (6) 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements (Jan 2014) (Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C). __ (7) 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (Jan 2014) (Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C). XX (8) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Aug 2013) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note). __ (9) 52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jul 2013) (41 U.S.C. 2313). __ (10) [Reserved]. __ (11)(i) 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole-Source Award (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 657a). __ (ii) Alternate I (Nov 2011) of 52.219-3. __ (12)(i) 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (OCT 2014) (if the offeror elects to waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C. 657a). __ (ii) Alternate I (JAN 2011) of 52.219-4. __ (13) [Reserved] XX (14)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644). __ (ii) Alternate I (Nov 2011). __ (iii) Alternate II (Nov 2011). __ (15)(i) 52.219-7, Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside (June 2003) (15 U.S.C. 644). __ (ii) Alternate I (Oct 1995) of 52.219-7. __ (iii) Alternate II (Mar 2004) of 52.219-7. __ (16) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (Oct 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)). __ (17)(i) 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Oct 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)). __ (ii) Alternate I (Oct 2001) of 52.219-9. __ (iii) Alternate II (Oct 2001) of 52.219-9. __ (iv) Alternate III (Oct 2014) of 52.219-9. __ (18) 52.219-13, Notice of Set-Aside of Orders (Nov 2011)(15 U.S.C. 644(r)). __ (19) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14)). __ (20) 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages-Subcon-tracting Plan (Jan 1999) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(F)(i)). __ (21) 52.219-27, Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 657 f). XX (22) 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)). __ (23) 52.219-29, Notice of Set-Aside for Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business (EDWOSB) Concerns (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)). __ (24) 52.219-30, Notice of Set-Aside for Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Concerns Eligible Under the WOSB Program (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)). XX (25) 52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755). __ (26) 52.222-19, Child Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Jan 2014) (E.O. 13126). XX (27) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999). XX (28) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007) (E.O. 11246). __ (29) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jul 2014)(38 U.S.C. 4212). XX (30) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (Jul 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793). __ (31) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (JUL 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212). __ (32) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec 2010) (E.O. 13496). __ (33) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (AUG 2013). (Executive Order 12989). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items or certain other types of commercial items as prescribed in 22.1803.) __ (34)(i) 52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-Designated Items (May 2008) (42 U.S.C. 6962(c)(3)(A)(ii)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.) __ (ii) Alternate I (May 2008) of 52.223-9 (42 U.S.C. 6962(i)(2)(C)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.) __ (35)(i) 52.223-13, Acquisition of EPEAT-Registered Imaging Equipment (JUN 2014) (E.O. 13423 and 13514). __ (ii) Alternate I (Jun 2014) of 52.223-13. __ (36)(i) 52.223-14, Acquisition of EPEAT-Registered Televisions (E.O. 13423 and 13514). __ (ii) Alternate I (Jun 2014) of 52.223-14. __ (37) 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products (DEC 2007) (42 U.S.C. 8259b). __ (38)(i) 52.223-16, Acquisition of EPEAT-Registered Personal Computer Products (JUN 2014) (E.O. 13423 and 13514). __ (ii) Alternate I (Jun 2014) of 52.223-16. XX (39) 52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (AUG 2011) (E.O. 13513). __ (40) 52.225-1, Buy American-Supplies (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83). __ (41)(i) 52.225-3, Buy American-Free Trade Agreements-Israeli Trade Act (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83, 19 U.S.C. 3301 note, 19 U.S.C. 2112 note, 19 U.S.C. 3805 note, 19 U.S.C. 4001 note, Pub. L. 103-182, 108-77, 108-78, 108-286, 108-302, 109-53, 109-169, 109-283, 110-138, 112-41, 112-42, and 112-43. __ (ii) Alternate I (May 2014) of 52.225-3. __ (iii) Alternate II (May 2014) of 52.225-3. __ (iv) Alternate III (May 2014) of 52.225-3. __ (42) 52.225-5, Trade Agreements (NOV 2013) (19 U.S.C. 2501, et seq., 19 U.S.C. 3301 note). XX (43) 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases (June 2008) (E.O.'s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury). __ (44) 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States (Jul 2013) (Section 862, as amended, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008; 10 U.S.C. 2302 Note). __ (45) 52.226-4, Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside (Nov 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150). __ (46) 52.226-5, Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside Disaster or Emergency Area (Nov 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150). __ (47) 52.232-29, Terms for Financing of Purchases of Commercial Items (Feb 2002) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 2307(f)). __ (48) 52.232-30, Installment Payments for Commercial Items (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 2307(f)). XX (49) 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-System for Award Management (Jul 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332). __ (50) 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Other than System for Award Management (Jul 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332). __ (51) 52.232-36, Payment by Third Party (May 2014) (31 U.S.C. 3332). __ (52) 52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards (Aug 1996) (5 U.S.C. 552a). __ (53)(i) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels (Feb 2006) (46 U.S.C. Appx. 1241(b) and 10 U.S.C. 2631). __ (ii) Alternate I (Apr 2003) of 52.247-64. (c) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (c), applicable to commercial services, that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: __ (1) 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67). __ (2) 52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires (May 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 67). __ (3) 52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards-Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts) (May 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 67). __ (4) 52.222-44, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards-Price Adjustment (May 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 67). __ (5) 52.222-51, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment-Requirements (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67). XX (6) 52.222-53, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Certain Services-Requirements (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67). __ (7) 52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers (May 2014) (E.O.13495). __ (8) 52.226-6, Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit Organizations (May 2014) (42 U.S.C. 1792). __ (9) 52.237-11, Accepting and Dispensing of $1 Coin (Sept 2008) (31 U.S.C. 5112(p)(1)). __ (10) 52.222-55, Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 (Dec 2014) (Executive Order 13658). (d) Comptroller General Examination of Record. The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of thi...