PARTS KIT, DIESEL EN

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE7L526P1631 to C U Enterprises Ltd (CAGE 0W778) on July 15, 2026, for the supply of a Parts Kit, Diesel Engine (NSN 2815-01-532-9561) under solicitation SPE7L5-26-T-2410. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order valued at $1,998 for two units at $999 each, with delivery required within 35 days of order date, targeting an August 19, 2026, deadline. Performance occurs at the contractor’s facility located at 411 Commerce CT, Lompoc, CA, where inspection, acceptance, and delivery all take place at origin under FOB Origin terms, shifting responsibility and risk to the Government upon shipment. The contractor must comply with extensive packaging and marking directives, including MIL-STD-129 for labeling and identification, ASTM D3951 for commercial packaging, and RP001 for palletization, while also adhering to hazardous material labeling requirements per 29 CFR 1910.1200 and ensuring no Class I ozone-depleting chemicals are used. Full traceability to the original manufacturer is mandated, with all parts required to be new, unused, and non-surplus, supported by a Certificate of Quality Compliance uploaded to the iRAPT system. The contract incorporates multiple FAR and DFARS clauses addressing small business representation, equal opportunity, combating trafficking in persons, paid sick leave, cybersecurity through NIST SP 800-171, cyber incident reporting, and hazardous materials compliance, all subject to deviation approvals under DEVIATION 2026-00038. Security prohibitions under the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act are in effect with alternate language applied, and subcontracting obligations for cybersecurity and labeling requirements must be flowed down. Payment is processed exclusively via Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, OH, using appropriation BX code 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. The contractor must also comply with DPAS priorities, ensuring rated performance over non-rated contracts. Despite comprehensive compliance and administrative clauses, specific evaluation factors, source selection criteria, and C