Project VI ERFO FW SOP 2022-1(1) - Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge

The contract awarded to Terra Firma Project LLC for $149,465.24 pertains to the replacement of a wooden bridge at Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge in the U.S. Virgin Islands under a Total Small Business Set-Aside as defined by FAR 19.5, with the NAICS code 237310 for Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. The solicitation, numbered 693C73-26-B-000012, was issued and awarded on June 25, 2026, following a bid opening on June 4, 2026, and was evaluated on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable basis, with the award going to the lowest-priced responsive bid. Work includes mobilization, construction survey and staking, removal of existing structures, installation of structural timber and composite lumber, helical piles, silt fencing for soil erosion control, and temporary traffic management, with all deliverables tied to measurable line items rather than formal performance metrics or quality standards. No explicit contract type is stated, but the structure, absence of options, and fixed-unit pricing indicate a Firm Fixed Price arrangement. The place of performance is explicitly defined as the wildlife refuge in the U.S. Virgin Islands, while the contracting office is located in Ashburn, Virginia, with primary point of contact Michael Sun and secondary contact C. Shawn Long, both reachable via [email hidden]. No formal contract clauses, representations, certifications, or special requirements such as key personnel, security clearances, or option periods were included in the documentation. Payment details, accounting identifiers such as TAS or AAC, invoicing methods like WAWF, and inspection acceptance protocols are not specified. The project’s financing, including appropriation data, and the identity of the Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative are also not provided. The bid tabulation reveals multiple contractor proposals with varying unit prices per line item, but only the winning bid’s total amount is confirmed. No attachments, packaging requirements, or formal statement of work beyond line-item descriptions were included in the publicly available information, and no technical evaluation narratives or scoring criteria were documented, further supporting the LPTA determination.