REGULATOR, PRESSURE,

A pressure regulator designed for use with anesthesia machines, this item is a black valve engineered to automatically maintain a predetermined outlet pressure within close limits regardless of fluctuations in higher inlet pressure, adjustable within a specified range and compatible with compressed gases and various liquids, potentially including gauges; it serves as a repair part for end item NSN 6515015646213. The contract calls for 31 units with a delivery requirement of 20 days after award, under FOB destination terms, with inspection and acceptance occurring at a designated DoD activity address code. Packaging must conform to MIL-STD-2073-1E and RP001 DLA Packaging Requirements, with preservation method designated as ZZ and marking following MIL-STD-129, including mandatory 2D Data Matrix barcoding and hazardous material labeling per 29 CFR 1910.1200, as well as compliance with Medical Marking Standard No. 1. The solicitation is issued under SPE2DS-26-T-033L through DLA’s DIBBS portal with a response deadline of May 5, 2026, and is managed by the Medical Supply Chain MD Surg FSF under the Department of Defense. The contract incorporates numerous FAR and DFARS clauses addressing supply inspection, hazardous material identification, whistleblower rights, former official compensation restrictions, disclosure of information, and ocean transportation obligations requiring U.S.-flag vessel use unless waived. Special requirements include mandatory notification for radioactive material shipments exceeding 0.002 microcuries per gram, flowdown of clauses to subcontractors, and compliance with cybersecurity standards referencing NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1. Offerors must possess a valid UEI or CAGE code and declare socioeconomic status including HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB, and other small business categories, with award possibly influenced by price preferences under socioeconomic set-asides. Invoicing must be submitted through WAWF, and the contract type, while not finalized, is anticipated to be fixed-price based on prevailing clause usage and acquisition context. No formal evaluation factors are defined, suggesting award may be driven primarily by regulatory compliance and price competitiveness.