Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Government Contract opportunity was posted on July 27, 2014. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

RESEARCH ON Who Participates in Innovation Accelerators and Business

Awarded
SBAHQ-14-Q-0035Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541720
New
Federal
Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) Updates
Solicitation # 693JJ926R000067
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is soliciting proposals for a single-award, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) completion contract to update the Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) evidence-based reference guide and its companion document, Countermeasures At Work (CMAW). The project involves developing the 13th and 14th editions of CMTW and the 2nd edition of CMAW, as well as updating the Electronic Countermeasures That Work (E-CMTW) website. The selected contractor will conduct comprehensive literature searches and synthesize research across eleven behavioral traffic safety program areas, updating approximately three to four chapters annually. The contract period consists of a twelve-month base period with four twelve-month options, for a total potential duration of sixty months. Award will be based on best value, with a primary emphasis on superior technical skills over the lowest cost. Evaluation factors include the offeror's understanding of research complexities, the soundness of the proposed approach, personnel qualifications, and corporate past performance. Deliverables must adhere to strict quality control standards, including the use of APA 7th edition style and rigorous anti-plagiarism compliance. All final text must be submitted in electronic format using minimal formatting to facilitate government printing. Proposals must be submitted in two separate volumes, technical and business, by November 5, 2026.
693JJ9 Nhtsa Office Of Acquistion

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 7 days
NAICS: 541720
New
SLED
ARFQ-0402-EDD2700000004-2 | Statewide Evaluation for the 21st CCLC Program
Solicitation # ARFQ-0402-EDD2700000004-2
The West Virginia Department of Education is seeking a statewide evaluator for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program, authorized under Title IV, Part B of the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The selected contractor will be responsible for collecting, validating, and analyzing evaluation data, which includes conducting at least one annual on-site visit to five selected subgrantees and delivering one in-person presentation of findings in Charleston, West Virginia, each contract year. Services are anticipated to begin in January 2027, with a Statewide Evaluation Plan due within 60 calendar days of the effective start date. This fixed-amount agency contract will be awarded to the vendor that meets all minimum qualifications and mandatory requirements for the lowest overall total cost, calculated as the sum of the initial contract year and three optional renewal years. Deliverables must be provided in accessible formats, including Microsoft Word, searchable PDFs, and nonproprietary machine-readable datasets. Due to the nature of the work, the contractor must adhere to strict data privacy standards, including FERPA compliance and the execution of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements. Bids must be submitted electronically via wvOASIS or delivered to the agency by November 12, 2026, at 10:30 AM EDT.
West Virginia

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 14 days
NAICS: 541720
New
SLED
Program Evaluation Services for the Local Community Benefits Fund
Solicitation # 2026-040
Solicitation 2026-040, issued by the Community Investments Office of the Air District, seeks a contractor to provide program evaluation services for 28 Round 1 grantees of the Local Community Benefits Fund. The project is designed to support the Air District's mission of improving air quality, reducing environmental inequities, and mitigating climate change across nine Bay Area counties. The contract has an established budget of 1,500,000 dollars and an anticipated duration of up to six years. The work is divided into two primary phases: Phase A, focusing on indicator tracking technical assistance for early grant implementation, and Phase B, which covers output tracking, analysis, and periodic program evaluation, culminating in a final synthesis of findings during years five and six. The selection process involves a two-phase evaluation consisting of a proposal review and an interview. Proposals are evaluated based on technical merit, with a preference given to local businesses headquartered within the Air District's jurisdiction. In the event of a tie in scoring, the lower cost offer will be accepted. Key requirements for respondents include a detailed technical proposal, a separate cost proposal, a disclosure regarding the use of Generative AI, and a commitment to retain project records for five years. The deadline for electronic submission via the procurement portal is November 30, 2026, at 4:00 pm Pacific Time.
Community Investments Office

POSTED

2 days ago

DEADLINE

in about 1 month
NAICS: 541720
New
Federal
Continuing Human Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS)
Solicitation # FA238424S2233
The Continuing Human Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS) program is a Multiple Authority Announcement (MAA) managed by the Air Force Research Laboratory Human Effectiveness Directorate and the United States Air Force School of Medicine. The program provides a comprehensive strategy for science and technology research, progressing from basic research to technology maturation to optimize and protect Airman capabilities across Air, Space, and Cyberspace. The scope is divided into three primary areas: Airman Biosciences, which focuses on biotechnology and aerospace medicine; Bioeffects, which addresses battlefield environmental stressors; and Warfighter Interactions and Readiness, which enhances mission execution. The MAA utilizes a flexible procurement framework, employing various authorities including Broad Agency Announcements, Other Transaction agreements for research and prototypes, and grants. Awards are generally anticipated to be cost-plus-fixed-fee. The selection process typically involves a two-step approach requiring an initial five-page white paper and rough order of magnitude cost, followed by a full technical and cost proposal for selected candidates. Evaluation is prioritized by technical merit, specifically focusing on innovation, understanding of scope, technical soundness, and transition potential, with cost realism serving as a secondary factor. Recent updates include several moratoriums to preserve competition, specifically closing technical areas related to BRDEE, Information Mastery in Cognitive Warfare, and Holistic Models for Decision-Making for six-month periods following specific proposal closing dates. All contractor personnel must undergo a minimum Tier 1 background check for positions of trust, and offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management. The program maintains strict data rights and security protocols, including foreign influence due diligence and specific DFARS requirements for technical data and computer software.
Air Force Research Laboratory

POSTED

2 days ago

DEADLINE

N/A

AI Contract Overview

Show more

Solicitation SBAHQ-14-Q-0035 is a request for quotations for a firm fixed-price contract to conduct research for the U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy. This total small business set-aside falls under NAICS code 541720 and has a performance period of 12 months. All work is to be performed at the contractor's facility. Interested parties must be active in the System for Award Management and submit their quotes via email to Robert Atchison by July 3, 2014. The government will evaluate quotes based on the quality of the technical approach, the qualifications and past performance of the researchers, and the potential for the research to make a fundamental or innovative contribution to existing literature. Proposals should include a literature review, hypotheses, data models, and a project timeline. Additionally, contractors must provide a payment plan and comply with Service Contract Labor Standards for any applicable nonprofessional labor categories.

General Info

Agency

N/A

Contract Value

$97,950

NAICS

541720 - Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities

Place of Performance

FL, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Award Issued Date

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

3 updates
PhaseAwarded
Posted

Combined Synopsis

Notice updated

Response deadline changed from Jun 30, 2014 to Jul 3, 2014. The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Get full access to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyN/A
Contacts1 person available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
N/A
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Robert Atchison

Full Description

Show more
This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with FAR Subpart 13.1 and the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The solicitation number for this requirement is SBAHQ-14-Q-0035 and is being issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-74. This will be a fixed price contract; this is a total Small Business set-aside; NAICS code is 541720 with a small business size standard of $19.0. Contractors must be registered and active in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (https://www.sam.gov) at time award is issued and throughout performance unless an exemption exists. Verbal quotes will not be accepted. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible quote whose offer is conforming to the solicitation, and will be most advantageous to the Government. This is not a request and/or classification for Research & Development services. The Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration examines the role and status of small business in the economy and independently represents the views of small business to federal agencies, Congress, and the President. It is the source for small business statistics presented in user-friendly formats, and it funds research into small business issues. For more information on the Office of Advocacy, including past research projects, see http://www.sba.gov/advocacy/847 and http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/ for archived reports. Contractors are invited to submit their quotations in response to this notice by 4:00PM Eastern Standard Time (EST), July 3, 2014. Only e-mailed requests for additional information will be accepted at contact@example.gov up to June 24, 2014. Quotations submitted in response to this notice shall include the solicitation number in the subject line and be submitted via email only to contact@example.gov . Communications with officials other than indicated above may compromise the competitiveness of this acquisition and result in cancellation of the solicitation and/or exclusion of your quotes from consideration. REQUIREMENTS: There is no incumbent. See attached Statement of Work for further information PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 12 months from date of award PLACE FO PERFORMANCE: All work shall be performed at the contractor facility in support of the Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration. BASIS FOR AWARD: Evaluation Procedures found at FAR 13.106-2(b) shall be used in this procurement. The Government will award a firm fixed-price purchase order resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Contractor whose quote conforming to the solicitation; is most advantageous to the Government price and other factors considered. Evaluation Factors The following technical factors will be used in the evaluation of quotes. TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA a. Quality of the technical quote and turnaround time; its clarity and demonstrated ability to perform the research in a timely manner. Evaluation shall assess the detailed technical description of how all the required work will be accomplished. This will include evaluation of the novelty of ideas put forth, literature review, demonstrated knowledge of covered literature and subject matter, familiarity with small business research, quality and use of data sources, and soundness of methodologies proposed for analysis and their appropriateness to the overall research being conducted relevant to the Statement of Work. In addition, the project timeline will be assessed to assure that the research report is completed in a timely manner and consistent with the methodologies prescribed in the quote. Researchers whose quotes include surveys should be mindful of the Paperwork Reduction Act and OMB clearance. For a good or excellent evaluation, the contractor must show the ability to accomplish the desired results and demonstrate the quality of work in providing services in a timely fashion. The following rating method shall be used in the evaluation of the technical approach information: Excellent - Based on the contractor's technical approach, no doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort. The technical approach shows a complete understanding and methodology for completing the Statement of Work within the standards and workload specified. Good - Based on the contractor's technical approach, little doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort. The technical approach shows an acceptable understanding and methodology for completing the Statement of Work within the standards and workload specified. Marginal - Based on the contractor's technical approach, some doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort. The technical approach shows a marginal understanding and methodology for completing the Statement of Work within the standards and workload specified. Poor - Based on the contractor's technical approach, serious doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort. The technical approach demonstrates significant deficiencies in understanding and implementing performance of the Statement of Work within the standards and workload specified. b. Researcher qualifications, experience (including past performance), if applicable and knowledge of literature in this field. The evaluation will be based on the information obtained in the quote and, when necessary, from other references provided by the contractor. It will also look at other relevant past performance information. The evaluation will consider: (1) the qualifications of the researcher(s) relevant to the analysis being performed in the quote and (2) knowledge and previous experience in researching the topic as stated in the Statement of Work. The Government will assess the relevant risks associated with each contractor to determine technical acceptance. Performance risks are those associated with a contractor's likelihood of success in performing the acquisition requirements as indicated by that contractor's record of past performance and knowledge and experience of the research in the fields relevant to this Statement of Work. For those Contractors who have contractual prior experiences, the Government will focus on the past performance as it relates to all acquisition requirements, such as cost, schedule and performance, including standards of good workmanship; the contractor's adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; the contractor's reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor's business-like concern for the interest of the customer. The Government will consider the number or severity of an contractor's problems, the effectiveness of corrective actions taken, the contractor's overall work record, and the age and relevance of past performance information. The following rating method shall be used in the evaluation of the technical approach information: Excellent - Based on the contractor's past performance record and/or qualifications and knowledge of the field, no doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort of the Statement of Work. Good - Based on the contractor's past performance record and/or qualifications and knowledge of the field, little doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort of the Statement of Work. Marginal - Based on the contractor's past performance record and/or qualifications and knowledge of the field, some doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort of the Statement of Work. Poor - Based on the contractor's past performance record and/or qualifications and knowledge of the field, serious doubts exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort of the Statement of Work. c. Likelihood that this research will make a fundamental contribution to the literature, produce an innovative concept or idea, offer policy relevant results, or develop new ground that has previously not been fully mined or understood. The evaluation will assess the quality of the quote based on its overall potential contribution to the literature in terms of innovativeness, policy relevance, or furthering the debate. The following rating method shall be used in the evaluation of the technical approach information: Excellent - Based on the contractor's quote, no doubt exists that the contractor's quote will make a fundamental contribution to the literature, produce an innovative concept or idea, or develop new ground that has previously not been fully mined or understood. Good - Based on the contractor's quote, little doubt exists that the contractor's quote will make a fundamental contribution to the literature, produce an innovative concept or idea, or develop new ground that has previously not been fully mined or understood. Marginal - Based on the contractor's quote, some doubt exists that the contractor's quote will make a fundamental contribution to the literature, produce an innovative concept or idea, or develop new ground that has previously not been fully mined or understood Poor - Based on the contractor's quote, serious doubt exist that the contractor's quote will make a fundamental contribution to the literature, produce an innovative concept or idea, or develop new ground that has previously not been fully mined or understood. Other information of relevance when submitting a quote: Research quotes should include a review of the literature, establish a set of hypotheses to be tested, describe the model, and describe the data to test the model, show the policy relevance of the research, list a timeline, include resumes for relevant subject matter and technical experts who will conduct and present the research. Some data sources require special access due to privacy concerns. Quotes must document the proposed process for acquiring access to such data if such data is proposed for use under this award. All costs associated with performing this service shall be inclusive of the offered fixed price for the service. Surveys are not preferred over using existing data, as they can place a burden on small businesses, but we recognize that on occasion they are necessary. Quotes that include uses of additional survey(s) for information should: demonstrate familiarity with the proposed survey procedures; provide the source for respondents; provide clarification of the collection process; and provide realistic estimates of the response rates. Quotes suggesting that surveys be conducted need to include the survey approval process in the timeline as required under the Paperwork Reduction Act's clearance process within the Office of Management and Budget (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_infocoll). Previously completed research funded by the Office of Advocacy can give researchers perspective when creating quotes. See http://www.sba.gov/advocacy/7540 Quotes are strongly preferred to be no longer than 25 pages, not including company credentials and references Price - Each price quote will be evaluated for reasonableness. Price reasonableness is a comparison of the proposed price with the prices proposed by other Contractors, the Government's estimate, current prices for the same or similar services, current market conditions, as well as other relevant measures. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTED QUOTES 1. Contractor's shall submit a payment plan utilizing the deliverable schedule located in the SOW. Payment plan will be reviewed for acceptance by the COR during post award/kick-off meeting. 2. Completed copy of FAR provision 52.212-3 (attached) submitted with quote. 3. Completed copy of FAR provision 52.222-52 (attached) submitted with quote. 4. Service Contract Labor Standards (formerly known as the Service Contract Act of 1965): Applicable to this solicitation: Proposed labor rates shall be fully-burdened rates. The Contractor shall be responsible for determining the appropriate labor category and rate in this schedule for his/her personnel, and shall specify the appropriate labor category from this schedule for all personnel proposed. The provisions of 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards (formerly known as the Service Contract Act of 1965) applies to all nonprofessional services to be provided under this requirement. The index of applicable wage determinations for this solicitation and resultant contract are shown in Attachment DOL Wage Determination (WD 05-2103 Rev.-13). Some of the proposed labor categories may be subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards (usually nonprofessional categories). As such, the Contractor should verify that its proposed base rates and fringe benefit rates for these labor categories meet or exceed the wage determination rates and fringe benefits for the areas included in the geographic scope of the contract (i.e., Contractor facility); the Contractor will be required to comply with applicable wage determination rates and fringe benefits regardless of the price proposed and awarded on any resultant contract. The Contractor may be required to submit supporting documentation for the proposed rates that will allow the contracting officer to conduct cost analysis to determine that offered prices are fair and reasonable. Contractors must comply with the base rate and fringe benefit rate requirements of the prevailing rate Wage Determination (WD) Revision Number incorporated into the award. In the quote, indicate which proposed labor categories are subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards by placing a double asterisk (**) next to the labor category name. The following paragraph is meant to be instructive and NOT to be copied as part of proposed pricing: Because the place of performance cannot be determined until after award, the WD attached to this solicitation will utilize Washington, D.C. as the place of performance. Interested parties will therefore have to follow the guidance provided in the next paragraph and adjust rates according their respective proposed facilities. Once awardee determination is made, the appropriate WD will be incorporated with Contractors' location. For all the Contractor's identified eligible labor categories, map them to the equivalent labor category title (titles/descriptions available at http://www.wdol.gov - click on the "library" link, then download the SCA Directory of Occupations, 5thEdition). Also identify the WD# that the labor categories in your offer are predicated on. Note that the applicable revision number for any Wage Determination number is the revision number identified in the solicitation index of wage determinations. There are two possible strategies for determining price adjustments under eligible labor categories. All price adjustments under eligible labor categories shall be in accordance with clause 52.222-43. SOLICITATION PROVISIONS/CLAUSES 52.212-3, Contractor Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders - Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition. The following additional FAR clauses, as cited in 52.212-5, are included: 52.204-10, 52.209-6, 52.209-10, 52.219-6, 52.219-13, 52.219-28, 52.222-3, 52.222-19, 52.222-21, 52.222-26, 52.222-36, 52.223-18, 52.225-13, 52.232-33, 52.239-1, 52.222-41. 52.204-7, System for Award Management 52.204-13, System for Award Management Maintenance 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference HTTP://FARSITE.HILL.AF.MIL https://acquisition.gov/far/index.html 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference HTTP://FARSITE.HILL.AF.MIL https://acquisition.gov/far/index.html 52.242-15, Stop Work Order 52.247-34, FOB Destination 52.246-4, Inspection of Services - Fixed Price 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons 52.232-16, Progress Payments 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-- System for Award Management 52.233-3, Protest after Award 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim 52.237-11, Accepting and Dispensing of $1 Coin

Earlier notices in this NAICS code

Posted before this notice, open and closed

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS