S--Trash pick up and Disposal FBO award announcement

This is a solicitation for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested. Solicitation Number VA250-14-R-0827 is being issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP), and the intent is to award a firm fixed price order for services. The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-36. This is a notice that this solicitation is a total small business set-aside for small business concerns. Only proposals submitted by small business concerns will be accepted by the Government. Any proposal that is submitted by a contractor that is not a small business will not be considered for award. SUBMISSIONS: All questions must be submitted to Wallace Larson, Contracting Officer by e-mail only no later than 10:00pm EDT on Wednesday, September 17, 2014. All responses to questions that may affect offers will be incorporated into a written amendment to the solicitation. Quotes and accompanying information must be submitted no later than 12:00 p.m. EDT, Friday, September 19, 2014. Technical questions and quotes must be sent by email to contact@example.gov. Solid Waste Collection NAICS Code: 562111 STATEMENT OF WORK 1. Contract Title. Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) and Single Stream Recycling Collection Service 2. Background. Executive Order 13514 Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance requires Federal agencies to divert at least 50 percent of non-hazardous solid waste by the end of fiscal year 2015. The Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center has an existing comingled/single stream recycling program. We recycle all plastics, except for plastic bags, but including blue wrap; mixed paper, such as books, magazines, catalogs, paperboard, newspaper, junk mail, etc.; cardboard; aluminum and steel cans, glass, Styrofoam, and wooden pallets. These materials are transferred from areas within the hospital to 40 yard cubic yard compacted container located next to the municipal solid waste container. 3. Scope. a. This service contract supports the Louis Stokes Cleveland VAMC and the Transitional Housing facility (TR House). The hospital uses a government-owned 40 cubic yard San-I-Pac auto-clave container for collection of municipal solid waste, a 40 cubic yard compacted container for the comingled recycling program and a 30 cubic yard roll off container that is used for landscaping waste. The TR House has a 6 yard container for municipal solid waste, 6 yard container for comingled recycling program and a 40 cubic yard open top container on an as needed basis for spring clean-up, and to discard used mattresses, etc. b. CONTAINER LOCATIONS. (1) The Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center is located at 10701 East Blvd. Cleveland, Ohio 44106. The MSW and comingled recycling containers are located on Magnolia Ave near the corner of E 105th St. (2) The Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center also has one (1) 30 yard roll off container located by the chiller Plant on Magnolia Ave. This container is used for landscaping waste. (3) The TR House is located at 9401 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, Ohio. The 6 cubic yard containers are located behind the facility. The TR House also has a 40 cubic yard open top container on for spring clean-up, and to discard used mattresses. c. DISPOSAL SCHEDULE. The contractor shall adhere to the following schedule: (1) Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center container for municipal solid waste: This container must be serviced on Monday, Wednesday and Friday between the hours of 6:00 - 8:00 am. (2) The comingled recyclables container will be serviced every 10 days between the hours of 6:00 am and 8:00 am. (3) The 30 yard roll-off container located by the chiller plant that will be serviced on an on call bases, approximately twelve (12) services calls per year. (4) The 6 yard MSW container and the 6 yard container for comingled recycling located at the TR House will be serviced one time per week on Thursday between the hours of 7:00 am and 9:00 am. The 40 cubic yard open top container on an as needed basis estimated six (6) times per year. This is for Waste pick and Recycling contract for Wade Park and TR House, commencing on Date of Award and ending September 30, 2015 with four one year option renewals. Option year rates will be reviewed on the anniversary date and adjusted according to the current industry market rate. 4. Specific Tasks. a. The contractor is responsible to provide labor required to collect and remove municipal solid waste (MSW) and comingled recyclable materials from the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center on a regular scheduled basis as specified within this contract. b. Each container shall be thoroughly cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition. Steam cleaning must be provided to clean the San-I-Pac Auto-Clave compactor container quarterly at no additional cost. The VA Medical Center will reserve the right to adjust service levels during the course of the contract period. This adjustment will be based on need of service plus or minus including any effects of recycling. Contractor will also meet with Medical Center Contracting Officer Representative on a quarterly basis to determine any changes required. c. Vehicles used in the collection of refuse shall be of a modern type designed for the efficient handling of refuse, and licensed and inspected to operate in the State of Ohio. They shall be equipped with a lift for handling and dumping of containers. The vehicle storage area shall have a covered body suitable for this type of service and be in compliance with State Law regarding waste transportation; disposal, and dumping in approved landfills. Vehicles shall be in good operating condition, and shall not leak oil or hydraulic fluids. Any fluid spills or leaks must be immediately cleaned and removed by the contractor on the same day spillage occurs. d. The contractor shall use an EPA approved landfill for the disposal of all solid waste and submit appropriate certificate validating compliance to this requirement. The contractor will provide monthly reports with tons of waste hauled away in the 40 yard compactor. The contractor will assume full responsibility for compliance with Federal, State and County laws, regulations and rules governing removal and hauling of waste materials. The contractor shall maintain all necessary license and /or permits required to perform this work. e. All non-recyclable waste shall be transported and disposed of in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations. All recyclable waste must be diverted from area landfills, and contractor is responsible for ensuring that recyclable waste is being recycled. The contractor shall furnish (for the time being) and maintain a 40 cubic yard compacted container for the comingled recyclables. (The government is in the process of purchasing the compact receivers and the stationary Compactor). The contractor will provide monthly reports with tons of recyclables hauled away in the 40 yard compactor, and also a breakdown in percentage of the recyclables materials. f. Contractor will provide rates that are firm for a 12 month period. There will be no pass through cost forwarded to VA Medical Center (no disposal increase, fuel increases, host site increases that are not included in the contract). 5. Performance Schedule: a. Base Year October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 b. Option Year 1 October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016 c. Option Year 2 October ,1 2016 through September 30, 2017 6. Price Schedule: The Offeror will provide fixed rate pricing on a per pick-up rate for each of the CLINS and option years listed below. Base Year-October 1, 2014 thru September 30, 2015 CLIN Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Unit Price Per Ton Total 0001 Pick-up 40 Yard container for MSW Wade Park 156 1 $ $ 0002 Pick-up 40 Yard recycling container Wade Park 36 1 $ $ 0003 Pick-Up 30 Yard container Wade Park, at Chiller Plant 12 1 $ $ 0004 Pick up 6 Yard container MSW TR House. 52 1 $ $ 005 Pick-up 6 Yard container for recycling at TR House. 52 1 $ $ 006 Pick-up 40 Yard container at TR House 6 1 $ $ Base Year Total $___________________________ Option Year 1 October 1, 2015 thru September 30, 2016 Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Unit Price Per Ton Total 0001 Pick-up 40 Yard container for MSW Wade Park 156 1 $ $ 0002 Pick-up 40 Yard recycling container Wade Park 36 1 $ $ 0003 Pick-Up 30 Yard container Wade Park, at Chiller Plant 12 1 $ $ 0004 Pick up 6 Yard container MSW TR House. 52 1 $ $ 005 Pick-up 6 Yard container for recycling at TR House. 52 1 $ $ 006 Pick-up 40 Yard container at TR House 6 1 $ $ Option Year 1 Total $___________________________ Option Year One Total $___________________________ Option Year 2 October 1, 2016 thru September 30, 2017 CLIN Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Unit Price Per Ton Total 0001 Pick-up 40 Yard container for MSW Wade Park 156 1 $ $ 0002 Pick-up 40 Yard recycling container Wade Park 36 1 $ $ 0003 Pick-Up 30 Yard container Wade Park, at Chiller Plant 12 1 $ $ 0004 Pick up 6 Yard container MSW TR House. 52 1 $ $ 005 Pick-up 6 Yard container for recycling at TR House. 52 1 $ $ 006 Pick-up 40 Yard container at TR House 6 1 $ $ Option Year 2 Total $___________________________ Option Year Two Total $___________________________ Total Contract Price _____________________ 7. Performance Monitoring Required Services Performance Standards Method of Surveillance Acceptable Quality Levels Maintain sanitary containers. Containers are maintained in a sanitary condition. The COR will perform 100% inspection to determine if the Contractor is compliant with contract requirements. 100% compliance required. Vehicle condition Provide appropriate vehicles and clean any spills. The COR will perform 100% inspection to determine if the Contractor is compliant with contract requirements. 100% compliance required. Proper transport and disposal of waste. Transport and dispose of waste in accordance with all Federal, State, and Local laws and regulations. Notification by regulatory authority. 100% compliance required. All recyclable waste must is diverted from area landfills, and is being recycled . 8. Risk Control The contractor shall take all precautions necessary to protect persons and property from injury or damage during the performance of this contract. Contractor will be responsible for all injury to themselves, their employees or others, as well as for any damage to personnel or public property that occurs during the performance of this contract is caused by their employee's fault or negligence. 9. Place of Performance. (1) The Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center 10701 East Blvd Cleveland, Ohio 44106. (2) TR House 9401 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, Ohio. 10. BASIS FOR AWARD The award resulting from this solicitation will be made based on the best overall proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government (i.e., best value). The following non-price factors, listed in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate offers: Technical Approach, Past Performance, and Socioeconomic Considerations. Price will be considered separately. The non-price factors when combined are significantly more important than the Price Factor. It should be noted that award may be made to other than the lowest priced Offeror, if the Government determines that a price premium is warranted due to merits of one (1) or more of the non-price factors. Price alone will not be the primary determining factor, and the eventual award will not be based on low price alone. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will determine the relative value of identified strengths and weaknesses in each proposal. The SSA will then perform a comparative analysis of the values of strengths and weaknesses versus price differences to determine the proposal(s) representing the best value to the Government. For this effort, the SSA will be the Contracting Officer (CO). A. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED 1. NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS: a) Technical Approach b) Past Performance c) Socioeconomic Consideration 2. PRICE FACTOR The non-price factors, when combined, are significantly more important than the Price Factor. B. ACQUISITION APPROACH This will be a Fixed Price (FP) Contract for Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) services for twelve (12) months with two (2) twelve (12) month options. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION 1. INTRODUCTION The Offeror's proposal shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer and or the Contracting Specialist via email or otherwise prescribed by GSA. The Offeror's proposal shall consist of the following four (4) volumes: a. Volume I: Technical Approach b. Volume II: Past Performance c. Volume III: Socioeconomic Considerations d. Volume IV: Price The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited. 2. PROPOSAL FILES a. Format: The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date, and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. Proposal page limitations are applicable to this procurement. The table below indicates the applicable maximum page count for each volume of the Offeror's proposal. All files shall be submitted as either Microsoft (MS) Excel (.xls) file, Acrobat Portable Document Format (.pdf) file, MS Word (.doc), or as compatible as indicated in the table. Page size shall be no greater than 8 1/2" x 11". The top, bottom, left, and right margins shall be a minimum of one (1) inch each. Font size shall be no smaller than 12-point. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required. Characters shall be set at no less than normal spacing and 100% scale. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no smaller than eight-point and may be landscape. Line spacing shall be set at no less than single space. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. Page numbers, company logos, and headers and footers shall be within the page margins only and are not bound by the 12-point font requirement. Footnotes to text shall not be added. If the Offeror submits annexes, documentation, attachments or the like, not specifically required by this solicitation, such will count against the Offeror's page limitations unless otherwise indicated in the specific volume instructions below. Pages in violation of these instructions, either by exceeding the margin, font, or spacing restrictions or by exceeding the total page limit for a particular volume, will not be evaluated. Pages not evaluated due to violation of the margin, font, or spacing restrictions will not count against the page limitations. The page count will be determined by counting the pages in the order they appear in the print layout view. b. File Packaging: All of the proposal files MAY be compressed (zipped) into one (1) file entitled "proposal.zip" using WinZip version 6.2 or later , or the proposal files may be submitted individually. Files shall not exceed 5 megabytes when compressed. The Government is not responsible for issues relating to any software compatibility, corrupted files, files that will not open, missing files or the alike. Content Requirements: All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal, and provide an adequate c. basis for evaluation. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details, in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. The titles and page limit requirements for each file are shown in the table below: Volume Factor File Name Page Limitations Volume I Technical Tech.doc/pdf 15 printed pages Volume II Past Performance Past Perf.doc/pdf 5 page narrative, (references will provide the questionnaire to the Government) Volume III Socioeconomic Considerations Soc.doc/pdf None Volume IV Price Price.xls/pdf/doc Spreadsheets + 1 page The cover page, table of contents, and/or a glossary of abbreviations or acronyms will not be included in the page count of the Technical Volume. C. EVALUATION FACTORS 1. VOLUME I - TECHNICAL APPROACH Offerors shall at a minimum address the following: a. Understanding of the Problem: 1) Did the offeror demonstrate a clear understanding of all features involved in solving the problems and meeting the requirements presented in the solicitation? 2) Did the offeror identify uncertainties and propose resolutions relevant to the requirements presented in the solicitation? 3) Did the offeror provide supporting rationale on how the requirements of the solicitation will be met, as opposed to merely restating the requirement or stating that the requirement will be met? b. Level of Effort: 1) Did the offeror's methods and approach to meeting the solicitation requirements provide the Government with a high level of confidence of successful completion within the required schedule? 2) What is the realism of the allocated hours, labor categories, and materials proposed? c. Completeness: 1) Did the offeror's methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the contract and/or solicitation? 2) What was the degree of risk associated with the offeror's proposed approach and what is the likelihood of success of the proposed approach? d. Key Personnel: Did the offeror propose key personnel, including Project Manager and other resources relevant for this project and have the knowledge, skills and experience to perform the tasks required under this solicitation? 2. Volume II - Past Performance Factor a. Past Performance will be evaluated based on the vendor's demonstration of successful, recent (within the last five years), and relevant (i.e., experience in providing services similar in size, scope, and complexity as described in the SOW past performance in the private sector and Federal government. Experience of the vendor with business process mapping and modeling; data governance practices; and data management implementation are critical to successful implementation. b. The past performance submission shall be comprised of a narrative describing past performance to include a brief description of services provided and reference point of contact information, past performance questionnaires completed by references and submitted directly to VA. c. Past performance information may be for the offeror, predecessor companies, teaming partner/subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, or personnel (managers, staff, and key personnel as identified in the solicitation) who have relevant experience IAW FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii). Past Performance may also be for past or current contracts IAW FAR 15.305(a)(2)(ii). The following information must be included in the narrative for each reference that will provide a past performance questionnaire: 1. Name and address, including zip code, of the Contracting Agency or Commercial Client 2. Contract Number 3. Brief description of contract/subcontract, the work performed, and relevance to this requirement 4. Total contract value 5. Period of Performance 6. Contracting Officer's telephone number and email address 7. Program manager, project officer, or Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR)'s telephone number and email address. d. If the past performance provided is for key personnel, all of the above bulleted information may not apply. Therefore, past performance references for key personnel must include the following: 1. Name and address, including zip code, of referenced employer 2. Brief description of the work performed, including experience, qualifications, and education of key personnel, and relevance to this requirement 3. Period of Performance 4. Immediate Supervisor's telephone number and email address 5. Names of Key Personnel, employment status with the Offeror Completed Past Performance Questionnaires: Offerors may submit a maximum of three total Past Performance references. Only a maximum number of three completed Past Performance references will be accepted by the Government. If the Offeror has no relevant past performance, it shall affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance. 3. Volume III - SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS a. The order of preference will be: 1. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 2. Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) 3. Non-Veteran Owned Offerors who are subcontracting with SDVOSB(s) or VOSB(s) a) Substantiating documents such as teaming agreements, Mentor Protégé agreements, and the like must be submitted with the offer. To receive credit as an SDVOSB or VOSB, an Offeror must be registered and verified in the VetBiz.gov Vendor Information Pages (VIP) database at www.vetbiz.gov at the time of award, in accordance with Veterans Affairs Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) 852.215-70, and registered in Central Contractor Registration (CCR) as required by 48 CFR Subpart 4.11, to be eligible to participate in VA VOSB prime contracting and subcontracting opportunities programs to receive new contract awards prior to December 31, 2011. b) Non-Veteran Owned Offerors must state in their proposals the names of the SDVOSBs and VOSBs with whom they intend to subcontract and provide a brief description of the proposed subcontracts and the approximate dollar values of the proposed subcontracts. In addition, the proposed subcontractors must be registered and verified in the VetBiz.gov VIP database at www.vetbiz.gov in accordance with VAAR 852.215-70 and registered in CCR as required by 48 CFR Subpart 4.11, to be eligible to participate in VA VOSB prime contracting and subcontracting opportunities programs to receive new contract awards prior to December 31, 2011. 1) To the maximum extent feasible, the contractor and any subcontractors shall comply with VA's VOSB, SDVOSB, socioeconomic, and other small business goals, including, but not limited to, 38 U.S.C. §8127. 2) The Offeror shall agree, if awarded a contract, to use the SDVOSB or VOSBs proposed as subcontractors or to substitute one or more SDVOSBs or VOSBs for subcontract work of the same or similar value. 3) The VA will assign evaluation credit for an Offeror (prime Contractor) that is a SDVOSB or VOSB. Non-Veteran owned firms that subcontract 7% or more of the contract value to a SDVOSB or 10% or more of the contract value to VOSB will also receive evaluation credit. The factor will be evaluated by the SSA/CO. 4. Volume IV - PRICE Price will not be evaluated adjectivally or assigned a score. The Government shall evaluate price to determine whether or not it is considered fair and reasonable based on FAR 8.405-2(d). In accordance with FAR 8.404 (d), GSA has already determined the prices of supplies and fixed-price services, and rates for services offered at hourly rates, under schedule contracts to be fair and reasonable. Therefore, the CO will be responsible for determining that the total price is reasonable from all responses received in accordance with the evaluation criteria provided to the contractors. All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by a team of at least three Government personnel. Contents of the written proposals will be evaluated to determine the degree and extent to which the requirements set forth in the Request for Proposal (RFQ) and SOW are satisfied. D. EVALUATION APPROACH Contents of the written proposals will be evaluated to determine the degree and extent to which the requirements set forth in the Request for Proposal (RFQ) and SOW are satisfied. 1. TECHNICAL EVALUATION APPROACH The Government will evaluate the Contractor's proposals based on their: a. Understanding of the Problem - The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it demonstrates a clear understanding of all features involved in solving the problems and meeting the requirements presented in the contract, and the extent to which uncertainties are identified and resolutions proposed. The proposal will be evaluated strictly in accordance with its written content. A proposal which merely restates the requirement or states that the requirement will be met, without providing supporting rationale, is not sufficient. b. Feasibility of Approach - The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror's methods and approach to meeting the contract requirements provide the Government with a high level of confidence of successful completion within the required schedule. The evaluation will also consider the realism of the allocated hours, labor categories, and materials being proposed. c. Completeness - The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror's methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the contract and/or solicitation. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed. Risk relative to the proposed Technical Approach is evaluated as part of the Technical Evaluation to ascertain the degree of risk associated with the Offeror's proposed approach and the likelihood of success of the proposed approach. d. Level of Effort - The technical review team will be responsible for considering the level of effort and the mix of labor proposed to perform a specific task being ordered. 2. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPROACH The Past Performance Approach will be evaluated based on the narrative, Past Performance references and other Government sources for quality, timeliness, and relevance (i.e., experience in providing services similar in size, scope, and complexity as described in the SOW. The Government will make determination of relevance. If no past performance information is readily available (FAR 15.306(a) (2) (iv)), the Offeror's past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably. 3. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS APPROACH In accordance with VAAR 852.215-70, SDVOSB, and VOSB Evaluation Factors, the Government will assign evaluation credit for an Offeror (prime contractor) which is a SDVOSB or some consideration for a VOSB. Non-Veteran Offerors proposing to use SDVOSBs or VOSBs as subcontractors will receive some consideration under this evaluation Factor. In accordance with VAAR 852.219-72, Evaluation Factor for Participation in the VA Mentor-Protégé Program, the Government will assign credit to large businesses with approved Mentor-Protégé Agreements. 4. PRICE EVALUATION APPROACH The Government shall evaluate price to determine whether or not it is considered fair and reasonable. Therefore, the Contracting Officer will be responsible for determining that the total price is reasonable from all responses received in accordance with the evaluation criteria provided to the contractors NOTE: Non-price factors are significantly more important than price. E. DEFINITIONS Strength: Results in significant benefit to the Government; potential for significant positive impact on quality of products or services. Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. Deficiency: Is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. 1. TECHNICAL APPROACH RATING DEFINITIONS Technical Approach will be evaluated against the following ratings: Rating Definition Excellent The proposed approach indicates an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of the program goals, resources, schedules, and other aspects essential to the performance of the program. The proposal contains major strengths, exceptional features, or innovations that should substantially benefit the program. There are no weaknesses or deficiencies. The relative risk associated with the proposed Technical Approach is very low. Good The proposed approach indicates a thorough understanding of the program goals and the methods, resources, schedules, and other aspects essential to the performance of the program. The proposal has major strengths and/or minor strengths, which indicate that the proposed approach will benefit the program. Weaknesses, if any, are minor and are more than offset by strengths. The relative risk associated with the proposed Technical Approach is low. Satisfactory The proposed approach indicates an adequate understanding of the program goals and the methods, resources, schedules, and other aspects essential to the performance of the program. There are some exceptional features to benefit the program. The proposal has some weaknesses that are offset by strengths. The relative risk associated with the proposed Technical Approach is moderate. Marginal The proposed approach indicates a superficial or vague understanding of the program goals and the methods, resources, schedules, and other aspects essential to the performance of the program. Numerous weaknesses and/or deficiencies exist which are not offset by strengths. The relative risk associated with the proposed Technical Approach is substantial. Unsatisfactory The proposed approach indicates a lack of understanding of the program goals and the methods, resources, schedules, and other aspects essential to the performance of the program. Significant weaknesses and/or deficiencies exist. The relative risk associated with the proposed Technical Approach is unacceptable. 2. PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR RATING DEFINITIONS The Government will evaluate past performance using the following adjectival ratings: Rating Definition Neutral/ Unknown Offeror has no record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available. (See FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv)). Excellent Based on the Offeror's performance record, essentially no risk exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance effort involved essentially the same size, scope, and complexity this solicitation requires. Good Based on the Offeror's performance record, low risk exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance effort involved much of the size, scope, and complexity this solicitation requires. Satisfactory Based on the Offeror's performance record, moderate risk exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance effort involved some of the size, scope, and complexity this solicitation requires. Marginal Based on the Offeror's performance record, substantial risk exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance effort involved very little of the size, scope, and complexity this solicitation requires. Unsatisfactory Based on the Offeror's performance record, extreme risk exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past/present performance effort did not involve the size, scope, or complexity this solicitation required. 3. SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FACTOR RATING DEFINITIONS The Government will evaluate Socioeconomic Considerations using the following adjectival ratings: Adjective Explanation Full Credit Eligible SDVOSB Partial Credit Eligible VOSB Some Credit Non-veteran Offerors proposing to use SDVOSB or VOSB as subcontractors with executed teaming agreements, Mentor-Protégé, or the like for 7% or more of the value to an SDVOSB or 10% or more of the value to a VOSB No Evaluation Credit The Offeror is not an SDVOSB or VOSB nor has it subcont...