SEAL, AIR, AIRCRAFT G

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded General Electric Company, operating as GE Aerospace with CAGE code 99207, a contract valued at $94,558.80 for the delivery of a single aircraft seal item identified by NSN 2840017059153 under delivery order SPE4A124G0013. The award was issued on July 21, 2026, through solicitation SPE4A5-26-T-0418 and is classified as a firm-fixed-price acquisition under NAICS code 336412 for aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Performance is to occur at GE Aerospace’s facility in Lynn, Massachusetts, with no indication of international performance or foreign subcontracting. The contract is a standalone delivery order under an existing IDIQ contract and includes no option periods, extensions, or other line items beyond the single seal item. The total contract value reflects the full amount awarded with no estimated future potential beyond this order. The contract enforces FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, implemented via DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which prohibits any form of discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin in hiring, contracting, or workforce practices. This clause is a material term of the contract and must be flowed down to all subcontracts performed within the United States. GE Aerospace is obligated to report violations by subcontractors, notify the Contracting Officer of any legal challenges to the clause, and maintain compliance as a condition of continued performance. Noncompliance may trigger contract termination, payment suspension, or debarment under the False Claims Act. No technical specifications, packaging standards, inspection criteria, or quality assurance requirements have been provided in the accessible documents. The Contracting Officer is Dean Allen, with contact information provided, but no Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical representative is named. No payment office, invoicing method, accounting data, or delivery schedule beyond the award date have been specified. The award was likely made on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable basis, consistent with DLA practices for routine, low-value aerospace components, though this basis is not formally documented.