SEALING COMPOUND

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a firm-fixed-price delivery order under contract SPE8ES-24-D-0005 to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, LLC, with a CAGE code of 79343, for the purchase of one unit of sealing compound identified by NSN 8030000087198 at a total price of $25.45. The award was issued on July 16, 2026, with delivery scheduled for July 30, 2026, to Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico under FOB destination terms, meaning title and risk of loss transfer upon receipt at the designated location. The contract is classified as a small business set-aside with affirmative certification for a Women-Owned Small Business, triggering compliance obligations under FAR 52.219-35 and SBA regulations regarding ownership and control documentation. Payment administration is managed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at a designated P.O. box in Columbus, Ohio, with invoices processed electronically via EDI using a local appropriation code of 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. The contracting officer is Nate Prattico of DLA Troop Support Construction & Equipment in Philadelphia, with no designated COR or COTR identified. The sealing compound must be shipped with contract identifiers SPE8ES-24-D-0005 and SPE8ES-26-F-62TZ affixed to all packaging and documents, and a unique tracking number FB485561970029 is included for shipment traceability, although specific packaging, marking, or barcoding standards such as MIL-STD-129 or MIL-STD-2073 are not mandated. The Government retains responsibility for inspection and acceptance at the destination, with compliance determined relative to the basic contract terms and the Defense Priorities and Allocations System rated order. No options, additional line items, or special requirements such as security clearances, key personnel designations, or OCI restrictions are included in the order, and no detailed technical specifications or inspection criteria beyond conformity to contract terms are provided. The low value of the order and lack of non-price evaluation factors suggest award was based on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable basis.