SPACER, SHAFT

The contract involves the procurement of 13 SPACER, SHAFT items with NSN 5365-01-094-9077, sourced under solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-325U, with a delivery requirement of 169 days ADO and a destination of Tracy, CA 95304-5000. The item is subject to strict export control under ITAR or EAR, restricting technical data disclosure to foreign persons, even within the U.S., and requires contractors to hold an approved US/Canada Joint Certification Program certification, complete DLA-specific export control training, and receive formal authorization from the DLA to access controlled data. Packaging and marking must adhere to MIL-STD-2073-1E and MIL-STD-129, with dry preservation method 31, bulk and boxed container configurations, and prohibition of mercury or mercury compounds in packaging except for limited authorized functional uses under NAVSEA 5100-003D. All items must be marked with the NSN and applicable CAGE codes and shipped FOB Origin with zero quantity variance allowed. The contractor must comply with cybersecurity requirements specified in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1, including safeguarding covered defense information, reporting cyber incidents, and submitting assessment summaries to the Supplier Performance Risk System with the option to rebut findings within 14 business days. Invoicing must be submitted via Wide Area WorkFlow, and the contract includes clauses addressing equal opportunity, human trafficking prevention, employment eligibility verification, whistleblower rights, disclosure of government contract information, and prohibition on covered defense telecommunications equipment. Offerors must represent their size status and socioeconomic qualifications, including HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB, and other categories, and disclose UEI and CAGE codes for any provider of covered defense telecommunications equipment. Proposals must be submitted through DIBBS by the deadline of May 20, 2026, and the contract type remains unspecified but may be fixed-price or cost-reimbursement as determined by the contracting officer. No contract value is provided, and the basis of award—whether lowest price technically acceptable or trade-off—is not stated.