TIMER ASSEMBLY, ULTR

The contract is for the procurement of one Timer Assembly, Ultrasonic Cleaner, part number M-1000 (0-60 min.), mechanically containing one timer, one timer knob, one timer back plate/dial, and two timer screws, identified by NSN 6530016869428, to be delivered to Fort Campbell, KY 42223-5000 under FOB Destination terms with a 20-day delivery window after order placement. The solicitation number is SPE2DH-26-T-3465, issued by the Department of Defense through DLA Troop Support, Medical Supply Chain FSH, with a response deadline of May 6, 2026. Technical and quality requirements are governed by the DLA Master List of Technical and Quality Requirements, referenced by R and I numbers, and compliance with ASTM D3951 and DLA Packaging Requirements for Procurement (RP001) is mandatory. Marking and packaging must adhere to MIL-STD-129, with Medical Marking Standard No. 1 superseding it for medical items; labeling must include unit of issue, quantity, and machine-readable barcodes as required. All supplies must have government identification removed if not accepted. Offerors must specify their source and part number, and comply with cybersecurity requirements under NIST SP 800-171, assessed through the Supplier Performance Risk System with high, medium, or basic ratings. The contract requires disclosure of Unique Entity Identifiers and CAGE codes, particularly if providing covered defense telecommunications equipment, and affirms compliance with Buy American and Berry Amendment restrictions. Payment is to be processed exclusively through Wide Area WorkFlow, and hazardous materials must be labeled according to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard and MIL-STD-129. Contract clauses include provisions for cybersecurity, equal opportunity, trafficking in persons, employment eligibility, sustainable products, hazardous material identification, and safeguarding covered defense information, with deviations applied to several clauses dated 2026. The contract type remains to be specified by the Contracting Officer and the award basis is inferred to be a trade-off, not LPTA, given the multifactor evaluation criteria prioritizing technical compliance, cybersecurity posture, and regulatory adherence over price alone.