VALVE, GATE

The contract SPE7MC26V1016, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency under the Department of Defense, was awarded to T AND T PRODUCTS LLC (CAGE 78HR2) for the procurement of 13 units of a gate valve identified by NSN 4820-01-286-7606. The solicitation was conducted under simplified acquisition procedures per FAR 13.302(a), indicating a commercial item purchase typically handled through streamlined processes. The original delivery date was set for April 1, 2026, with a unit price of $5,316.82, resulting in a total estimated value of approximately $69,118.66. However, the order was later canceled due to non-delivery, resulting in the line item’s extended price being reduced to $0.00 through contract modification P00001, which was officially issued on July 16, 2026. The contract does not specify any active delivery schedule, FOB terms, or place of performance beyond the contractor’s location in Florence, Alabama, and no government receiving point is identified. The acquisition was processed under a likely firm-fixed-price structure, though the contract type is not formally designated. The contracting officer is Mark Lankford of DLA Land and Maritime, with no assigned Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative listed. Payment processing is managed through DLA Land and Maritime’s office in Columbus, Ohio, with no details provided regarding invoicing systems or electronic submission methods. Despite the NSN indicating standard military logistics alignment, no technical specifications, quality standards, packaging requirements, marking directives, bar-coding rules, or MIL-STD references are included. The contractor’s CAGE code is listed, but no socioeconomic certifications, Size Status declarations, or required representations under Section K were provided or verified. The procurement was not set aside under any identified socioeconomically targeted program, and no evaluation factors, award rationale, or inspection criteria beyond general government acceptance authority were documented. The absence of Section I clauses, Section J attachments, Section D packaging details, Section M evaluation factors, and Section H special requirements suggests an administrative, low-complexity acquisition that was ultimately terminated due to non-performance.