Andrew L Maine

Andrew L. Maine serves as a Contracting Officer responsible for managing complex acquisition programs centered on scientific and technical services. In this role, he ensures compliance with federal procurement regulations while advancing mission-critical research and engineering objectives. His portfolio primarily involves soliciting, evaluating, and awarding contracts for professional services requiring specialized technical expertise, particularly in physical, engineering, and life sciences research. He works closely with program managers, technical evaluators, and legal advisors to structure solicitations that promote competition, ensure technical rigor, and align with agency priorities. Mr. Maine’s contracting patterns reflect a strong preference for full and open competition, with 100% of his awards issued without set-aside restrictions. He does not routinely utilize socioeconomic programs such as 8(a), HUBZone, or SDVOSB set-asides, instead prioritizing technical capability and performance history as the primary selection criteria. His approach emphasizes transparency and equitable access for all qualified vendors, fostering a competitive environment where merit and expertise drive award decisions. His procurement focus is heavily concentrated in NAICS 541712, encompassing research and development services in physical, engineering, and life sciences, as well as NAICS 541690 for other scientific and technical consulting. He regularly acquires services such as experimental design, data analysis, prototype development, systems engineering, and technical advisory support for government-led R&D initiatives. His work supports projects requiring advanced analytical methods, laboratory validation, and engineering innovation, often involving interdisciplinary teams and cutting-edge methodologies. Mr. Maine collaborates with a broad range of contractors, including large research institutions, specialized engineering firms, and independent technical consultants with demonstrated expertise in scientific domains. His contracting approach prioritizes performance-based outcomes, clear statement of work development, and rigorous evaluation of technical proposals to ensure high-quality deliverables aligned with federal research objectives.