C--INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES DESIGN, ENGINEERING, SPECIFICATION WRITING, COST ESTIMATING, AND RELATED SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC

Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for the preparation of plans, specifications utilizing the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) SPECSINTACT program, cost estimates utilizing the NAVFAC SUCCESS ESTIMATOR program, Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), Request for Proposal (RFP) documentation for Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects, and Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation at various locations in all areas under the cognizance of NAVFAC Pacific. If asbestos or hazardous materials exist, the Architect-Engineer (A-E) contractor shall identify and provide for their disposal in the required documents in accordance with applicable rules and regulations pertaining to such hazardous materials. The selected A-E may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. The following selection criteria, in relative order of importance, will be used to evaluate the qualifications of the A-E firms: Criterion (1). Professional qualifications of firm and staff proposed for the preparation of plans, specifications utilizing the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) SPECSINTACT program, cost estimates utilizing the NAVFAC SUCCESS ESTIMATOR program, Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), Request for Proposal (RFP) documentation for Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects, and Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation, in a tropical environment similar to Hawaii, Guam, and Pacific Ocean areas. The evaluation will consider education, training, registration, overall and relevant experience and longevity with the firm. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: (1) SF330, Part 1, Section E. For the proposed team, provide a maximum of 5 relevant and completed projects. Projects submitted must have been completed within the past 5 years. (2) SF330, Part 1, Section H. For the prime and subconsultants, provide a list indicating by discipline (i.e., civil, architectural, mechanical, electrical etc.) the number of personnel that has a current professional registration. Criterion (2). Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members for the preparation of plans, specifications utilizing the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) SPECSINTACT program, cost estimates utilizing the NAVFAC SUCCESS ESTIMATOR program, Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), Request for Proposal (RFP) documentation for Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects, and Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation, in a tropical environment similar to Hawaii, Guam, and Pacific Ocean areas. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: SF330, Part 1, Section F. For the proposed team, provide a maximum of 10 relevant and completed projects. Projects submitted must have been completed within the past 5 years. Criterion (3). Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. For each relevant project submitted for Criterion (2), Specialized Recent Experience and Technical Competence, submit a DD2631,Performance Evaluation (Architect-Engineer). If a DD2631 is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from NECO, https://www.neco.navy.mil) and submit the Survey with the SF330. The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a sub-contractor. The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Government’s evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS/ACASS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the DUNS number provided for the firm. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. Criterion (4). Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and subconsultants for the specified performance period. Criterion (5). Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability (e.g., LEED) concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide specific examples on a maximum of five (5) projects completed that applied sustainability concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. Discuss key LEED personnel experience and qualifications. Criterion (6). A-Es quality control program. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Briefly describe how the prime will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the team’s QC processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. Criterion (7). Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project (e.g., Hawaii, Guam and other areas in the Pacific Ocean) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Indicate location of office that will be performing the work including sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographical area (e.g., Hawaii, Guam and other areas in the Pacific Ocean). Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on site support. Criterion (8). Small Business Utilization. The Government will evaluate two subfactors: (A) Past performance in Utilization of Small Business Concerns and (B) Participation of Small Business Concerns in this Project SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: SF330, Part 1, Section H: Subfactor (A). PAST PERFORMANCE IN UTILIIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS: a. Provide documentation on historical data over the past 3 years showing dollar value, percentage of work (of total contract revenues) subcontracted to LB, SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB utilizing the format provided. Download the form from NECO (https://www.neco.navy.mil. b. Provide information on national and industry-issued awards received for outstanding support to SB concerns within the past five (5) years. Include dates that the award was received. National and industry-issued awards received beyond (5) years will not be considered. c. Provide information showing Small Business Subcontracting Plan compliance performance evaluation ratings (i.e., SF1420, DD2626, or equivalent) received on five (5) most recent projects. Recently completed project evaluations are desired, however, in the absence of recently completed project evaluations, interim ratings may be considered. If more than five (5) ratings are provided, only the first five will be considered. d. Provide information on previous, existing, planned or pending mentor-protégé agreements under any Federal Government program. e. Provide information on use of Community Rehabilitation Program organizations certified under the AbilityOne Program by NISH or the National Industry for the Blind (NIB). f. Provide Final SF294 Reports/Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs), for five (5) of the most recently completed projects that required periodic reports. If more than five (5) Final SF294s/ISRs are provided, only the first five will be considered. Other than Final SF294s/ISRs will not be considered. If you provide less than five (5) Final SF294s/ISRs, provide an explanation. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If SF294 Reports/ISRs are not available, similar reports providing this information, that can be externally validated, may be submitted. Subfactor (B), PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS IN THIS PROJECT a. Identify, in terms of dollar value and percentage of total proposed price, the extent of work you will perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a Joint-Venture (JV), please identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member, e.g., LB, SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, etc. b. Address planned usage of small business concerns, including SDB, HUBZone, WOSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Small Business Subcontracting Targets that meet or exceed the NAVFAC Small Business Subcontracting Targets, and a commitment to using SBs, including AbilityOne CRP organizations and mentor-protégé agreements for this project. Proposed goals exceeding the NAVFAC Subcontracting Targets may be rated higher. The proposed goals and NAVFAC Subcontracting Targets are expressed as a percentage of total subcontracted values. The NAVFAC Subcontracting Targets for this project are as follows: FY2011-FY13 SB Concerns 66.31% SDB Concerns 16.51% WOSB Concerns 14.82% HUBZone SB Concerns 1.39% SDVOSB Concerns 3.00% Expressed in total subcontracted value. NOTE: (1) Slated Large Business firms will be required to submit a subcontracting plan prior to the interview. (2) In order to receive proposal evaluation benefit as HUBZone SB either as prime or subconsultant, proposed HUBZoneSB’s must be certified by the Small Business Administration. Prime contractors may determine whether a prospective subconsultant is a certified HUBZone by accessing the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) at http://www.ccr.gov. Criterion (9). Equitable distribution of DoD work in the last 12 months. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list of DoD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office was awarded the contract/task order. This announcement is UNRESTRICTED and open to large and small business concerns. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541330. The small business size standard is $4.5 million average annual receipts over the past three years. If a large business is selected for this contract, a subcontracting plan will be required (FAR 52.219-9). The resultant contract will be an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract. Work under this IDIQ contract will be issued by firm-fixed price task orders. The contract term will be a base year and two one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $7,500,000. The Government guarantees a minimum of $10,000 for the contract term. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. Contractors are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Estimated construction cost of project is between less than $5,000 and $50,000,000. Estimated date of contract award is July 2011. Proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. Offerors are required to complete the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) via website http://orca.bpn.gov. Refer to FAR Clauses 52.204-7 Central Contractor Registration and 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications. Offerors must complete the ORCA by the response date. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. This announcement requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via email, therefore, email address must be shown on the SF 330, Part 1, Section B8. A E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330, Architect Engineer Qualifications. SF330, Part II, shall be submitted for each firm that will be part of the team proposed and identified in Part I. Two paper copies and one electronic copy of the SF330 are required. Firms responding to this announcement by 10 March 2011, 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) will be considered. No electronic mail or facsimile submittals of the SF330 will be accepted. SF330s shall be submitted to Ann Saki-Eli, Contract Specialist, NAVFAC Pacific at: (1) If sent via U. S. Postal Mail: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific Construction Contracts Branch (ACQ31:AHS) 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134 (2) If hand-carried/Private Courier: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific Construction Contracts Branch (ACQ31) 4262 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296 Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. This is not a request for a proposal.