Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Pre-Solicitation opportunity from Department Of Defense was posted on March 16, 2022. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Market Fresh Grocery Items to Military/Federal customers in Saipan and Tinian CNMI

Closed
SPE30222QS006Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 311999
New
Federal
Supplement for Egg Products
Solicitation # 12-3J14-Notice-26-024
The USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has issued a special notice and supplement for the procurement of egg products, including whole eggs, hard-boiled eggs, all-purpose egg mix, and frozen scrambled egg patties. This procurement is governed by the Federal Purchase Program Specification (FPPS) and the AMS Master Invitation for Bids Domestic Programs (MIFB-D). A critical update to this program is the mandatory transition to AMS Quality Assessment Division (QAD) audit-based acceptance services (Option B) effective January 2027, replacing previous grading-based monitoring. All costs associated with AMS representative services, including audits and supervision, are the responsibility of the contractor. To become eligible for bidding, contractors must submit a technical proposal in a non-PDF format, such as Microsoft Word, following the specific templates provided in Exhibits A through D. This proposal must document a comprehensive quality control program covering processing, packaging, and labeling. Additionally, contractors must provide a five-pound product sample—except for bulk liquid whole eggs—which must include detailed labeling of ingredients, nutrition facts, and allergen declarations. Eligibility is determined through a technical review by the Standards and Specification Division (SSD), approval of product samples, and a pre-bid onsite capability assessment audit by the QAD, which evaluates food defense plans, production compliance, and quality records.
USDA Ams 3J14

POSTED

5 days ago

DEADLINE

in 2 months
NAICS: 311999
New
Federal
Federal Purchase Program Specification for Whole Eggs
Solicitation # 12-3J14-Notice-26-023
The United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service is soliciting the procurement of whole egg products under the Federal Purchase Program Specification for Whole Eggs, effective October 2026. This solicitation, identified as 12-3J14-Notice-26-023, covers three primary deliverables: bulk liquid whole eggs shipped in 48,000-pound insulated tankers, and frozen homogenized whole eggs with color stabilizer packaged in either two-pound or five-pound pitcher-pour polyethylene-coated paperboard cartons. All products must be produced in the United States within an FSIS official plant and adhere to strict microbiological standards, including negative results for Salmonella and specific limits for standard plate and coliform counts. The contract is governed by the AMS Master Invitation for Bids Domestic Commodity Procurements and incorporates Quality Assessment Division policies and regulations under 9 CFR 590 and 592. Key requirements include the use of FDA-approved, tamper-evident packaging and the provision of a Certificate of Conformance for each delivery. Packaging must comply with National Motor Freight and FSIS regulations, specifically prohibiting the use of steel or wire straps and staples for final closures. Quality acceptance is tied to laboratory analysis of samples submitted to the USDA AMS laboratory, with specific temperature requirements for both shipping and destination arrival to ensure product integrity.
USDA Ams 3J14

POSTED

5 days ago

DEADLINE

in 2 months

General Info

NAICS

311999 - All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing

Place of Performance

Saipan, MP, USA

Set-Aside

SBA

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

PhaseClosed
Posted

Sources Sought

Type Changed

Sources Sought → Presolicitation

Response Deadline

Deadline has passed

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Defense → DLA Troop Support Indo-Pacific
Contacts2 people available
OfficeJBPHH, HI, 96860-3520, USA
Office AddressJBPHH, HI, 96860-3520, USA

Full Description

Show more
The DLA Troop Support intends to solicit for a Market Ready BPA (fresh fruits and vegetables (FF&Vs), Bakery Items, and various grocery items for DoD (Troop) customers located on the Islands of Saipan and Tinian Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Maximum estimated cumulative 36 months dollar value is $750,000.00 for 3 years. This acquisition will be Small Business Set-Aside 100% basis. The total length of the BPA will be three (3) years. It's estimated maximum total contract dollar value is $750,000.00. The delivery points require indefinite quantities of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables throughout the term of the BPA. A more detailed listing of the delivery sites can be found in the solicitation. All responsible sources may submit proposals that will be considered by DLA Troop Support. The Government will award a BPA(s) resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer(s) conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The source selection method for this procurement will be the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures and shall use the following to evaluate offers: 1. Technical Acceptability - A technically acceptable offer is an offer that takes no exceptions to the terms and conditions in the solicitation and complies fully with all submission requirements, including submissions relating to the two subfactors listed below. A proposal that takes exception to solicitation terms and conditions or that fails to comply with all submission requirements may be deemed technically unacceptable and, thus, may be found ineligible, and removed from further consideration, for the award. By submitting a proposal with no exceptions, an offeror is confirming it possesses the necessary facilities, equipment, technical skills, and capacity to successfully provide all items required by this solicitation. The following sub-factors will be evaluated and must be found acceptable for a proposal to be eligible for award: A. Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) License - The offeror shall possess and submit proof of a valid current PACA license. B. Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Good Handling Practices (GHP) Audit - The offeror shall submit a valid, current USDA GAP/GHP audit report / certificate covering a full range of fresh fruits and vegetables for each place of performance identified in the offeror's proposal. The audit report must demonstrate a passing score, and specifically passing in the following parts: General, Wholesale Distribution (6) and Preventive Food Defense (7). In lieu of a USDA GAP/GHP audit report / certificate, the offeror may submit an audit report / certificate conducted by a recognized private independent third-party certifying company certifying to an industry recognized food safety standard that exceeds all aspects of the USDA GAP/GHP audit report / certificate requirements. The audit report(s) must demonstrate that a passing score(s) was/were received. NOTE: Offerors relying on a non-USDA GAP/GHP audit report / certificate must agree to have a USDA GAP/GHP audit report / certificate for each place of performance by the start of contract performance. 2. Pricing - Pricing is required for all items found in the Schedule of Items (for each Group, if applicable) and for all years. Failure to offer pricing for all items and for all years may result in a proposal being removed from consideration for award as technically unacceptable. The Government will perform an aggregate price analysis on all items found in the Schedule of Items (for each Group, if applicable). To determine an offeror's Evaluated Aggregate Price, the Weighted Aggregate Distribution Price will be added to the Aggregate Delivered Price. Please refer to paragraph (A) of this provision for further details regarding these price components. The award(s) will be made on the basis of the lowest Evaluated Aggregate Price (for each Group, if applicable) of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-price factors. The Government reserves the right to remove item(s) from the Schedule of Items or do a common item comparison if offerors do not submit pricing for all items. Prior to award, the offered prices of the presumptive awardee(s) will be evaluated on an individual line-item basis to determine whether each price is fair and reasonable using analytical techniques deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer in her/his complete discretion. A. Price Components: 1. Weighted Aggregate Distribution Price: Aggregate Distribution Price is obtained by first multiplying the proposed distribution price for each item in the Schedule of Items by the item's estimated quantity to calculate the total distribution price for each item. Then, the total distribution prices of all items will be added together to determine the total distribution price for year 1. The total distribution price for each subsequent year will also be calculated. The total distribution prices for all years will be added together to determine the Aggregate Distribution Price. The Aggregate Distribution Price is then multiplied by a weighting factor of 6 to arrive at the Weighted Aggregate Distribution Price. Note: the weighting factor is applied only to the overall Aggregate Distribution Price (not on a line-item basis) and is to be used for evaluation purposes only. The Government's use of a weighting factor of 6 for distribution pricing is done in order to more accurately balance the significance of the pricing components and their respective impact on any subsequent contract(s) issued under this solicitation. 2. Aggregate Delivered Price: The Aggregate Delivered Price is obtained by first multiplying the proposed delivered price of each item in the Schedule of Items by the item's estimated quantity to calculate the total delivered price for each item. Then, the total delivered prices of all items will be added together to determine the total delivered price for year 1. The total delivered price for each subsequent year will also be calculated. The total delivered prices for all years will be added together to determine the Aggregate Delivered Price. 3. Evaluated Aggregate Price: The Evaluated Aggregate Price is obtained by adding the Weighted Aggregate Distribution Price and Aggregate Delivered Price together. 4. For purposes of the Price Proposal Evaluation, Weighted Aggregate Distribution Price and Aggregate Delivered Price are considered equal. This equality is accounted for mathematically by applying a weighting factor of 6 (based on current Government data) to the Aggregate Distribution Price. Options are not included in this solicitation. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award. Past Performance will not be used as an evaluation factor for this solicitation since technical problems are not anticipated. In accordance with FAR 15.304(c)(3)(iii), the Contracting Officer has determined that Past Performance is not appropriate due to the fact that all producers of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables are considered to be technically equal based on historical records of equal technical ratings for past performance. All known vendors have similar records of good delivery of quality items. Past Performance will be considered in a determination of responsibility for the successful offeror prior to award. The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received. See www.ams.usda.gov/services/auditing/gap-ghp/audit for details concerning program and certification. Copies of the solicitation will be found on SAM.gov (SAM) in a future posting and the DLA-EBS Internet Bid Board System (DIBBS) at https://www.dibbs.bsm.dla.mil. If not already registered, prospective offerors will be required to do so prior to viewing and downloading a copy of the solicitation. RFPs are in portable document format (PDF). In order to download and view these documents, prospective offers will need the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader. This software is available free at http://adobe.com. Solicitation issue date will be late-March 2022 and will be issued under FAR 15.101-2 Low Price Technically Acceptable (LTPA). The resultant award will be for a BPA.

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS