PP-SPR-25-0285

The City of Bakersfield has issued a forecast solicitation for a Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a new detached Accessory Dwelling Unit at 5712 March Meadows Way, Bakersfield, CA 93313, under project identifier PP-SPR-25-0285. The project is governed by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provisions, specifically qualifying for a Class 3 Categorical Exemption under Section 15303, which allows for the construction of small structures on single-family residential lots without requiring full environmental impact review. The exemption was officially certified on October 2, 2025, with the City acting as the lead agency responsible for review and approval. The applicant, S/F Associates, submitted the required documentation, including the certified exemption finding, and no federal contracting mechanisms such as FAR clauses, CAGE codes, or socioeconomic certifications are applicable or present, as this is a local land use and permitting action. The sole deliverable is regulatory approval of the site plan based on compliance with local zoning and building codes, with no associated pricing, payment terms, or procurement evaluation factors documented. The point of contact for the request is Taniya Wright, Assistant Planner with the City of Bakersfield Development Services Department, who serves as the lead agency representative and signed the exemption notice. Tyler Hess of S/F Associates is identified as the project applicant, and no official Contracting Officer’s Representative, Contracting Officer, or other federal-style oversight roles are designated. There are no specified delivery schedules, invoicing procedures, inspection protocols, or packaging requirements, as the transaction does not involve the sale or delivery of goods or services in the traditional procurement sense. The process is administrative and regulatory, centered on verifying eligibility for environmental exemption and compliance with municipal land use regulations. The project is not a competitive solicitation, lacks a defined period of performance, and contains no financial terms or line-item costs, indicating it is a permitting action rather than a contractual acquisition. All documentation reflects the local jurisdiction’s authority over residential development, with no federal procurement rules, standards, or financial obligations referenced or enforced.