Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Sources Sought opportunity from Department Of Defense was posted on September 2, 2026. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION - Exploring Innovative Design and Construction Methodologies with Korean Industry

Closed
W912UM26Z9999Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 23
Federal
Industry Day: A Government-Industry Exchange on Construction Contracting - An Invitation for Industry Partners to Collaborate with the United States Space Force Operational Contracting Enterprise
Solicitation # AFICC_KS_Industry_Day_September_2026
The United States Space Force Operational Contracting Enterprise is hosting an Industry Day on September 14, 2026, in Colorado Springs and via Microsoft Teams to collaborate with general contractors on accelerating construction timelines. The event focuses on the implementation of new, flexible contracting authorities, specifically Other Transaction Authority (OTA) under 10 U.S.C. section 2808a. This initiative aims to bypass traditional FAR-based procurement bottlenecks through Commercial Solutions Openings (CSOs), allowing the government to integrate commercial best practices and innovative building methods to move from concept to capability faster. Budget projections for FY27 through FY31 indicate significant opportunities, with approximately 5.6 billion dollars for MILCON and 3.3 billion dollars for FSRM projects. Under the 2808a authority, awards must be structured as Fixed-Price Other Transactions, such as Fixed-Price Incentive or Fixed-Price Award Fee agreements. Because these OTs lack standard FAR-based protections, the government and industry partners will develop tailored articles to govern disputes, changes, and terminations. The award process is phased, beginning with a white paper evaluation based on relevance and rough order of magnitude pricing, followed by an oral pitch of constructability plans, and concluding with the joint development of a Statement of Work. Evaluation criteria emphasize industrial construction methods, schedule realism, financial health, and adherence to commercial building codes like IBC and NEC, as well as DoD Unified Facilities Criteria. While flexible, these agreements still require compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act, Service Contract Act, Miller Act, and the Buy American Act.
Air Force Space Command

POSTED

about 1 month ago

DEADLINE

in 11 days

AI Contract Overview

Show more

The USACE Far East District is conducting a Request for Information to identify innovative design and construction methodologies and project delivery methods within the Korean industry. This effort is intended to support a Reverse Industry Day scheduled for October 6, 2026, where the government and industry will exchange information on improving project timelines and controlling costs. The agency is specifically exploring the use of Progressive Design-Build, Other Transaction Authority, and Construction Manager at Risk, as well as industrialized construction methods such as volumetric modular construction, 3D printing, and prefabricated components. Interested companies in design, engineering, construction, architecture, and project management are invited to provide their capabilities and experience, regardless of whether they have previously worked with the U.S. Government. The government is seeking insights into Korean best practices and potential barriers to implementing non-traditional contracting methods. Responses, including company details and suggested discussion topics, must be submitted to the designated email address by September 11, 2026, at 5:00 PM Korean Standard Time.

General Info

US Army Corps of Engineers seeks market research on innovative Korean construction methodologies.

NAICS

23 - Construction

Place of Performance

AP, KOR

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

3

PDB with OT Process Overview Placemat

PDF, Low priority1 page · other
Low

Playbook: Executing Progressive Design-Build (PDB) with OTA

PDF, Low priority27 pages · playbook
Low

Placemat+Design+Build+to+Budget.pptx

PPTX

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Sign up to view the full breakdown with detailed analysis of each section.

Timeline

1 update
PhaseClosed
Posted

Sources Sought

Notice updated

Response deadline changed from Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 11, 2026. The notice description changed.

Response Deadline

Deadline has passed

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Defense → W2SN Endist Far East
Contacts2 people available
OfficeAPO, AP, 96271-0000, USA
Office AddressAPO, AP, 96271-0000, USA

Full Description

Show more

SPECIAL NOTICE – REQUEST FOR INFORMATION AMENDMENT 01


USACE FED plans to hold a Reverse Industry Day on 6 October 2026. The exact time and location will be announced separately to interested companies. Information received in response to this RFI will help USACE FED prepare for the event and identify topics that will support meaningful discussions with industry in Korea.


The Reverse Industry Day will provide an opportunity for USACE FED and Industry to openly exchange information and learn from each other regarding innovative or non-traditional acquisition and project delivery methods, as well as real-world experiences and lessons learned in improving project delivery timelines and controlling costs.


1. Purpose


Currently, USACE FED is looking for better ways to manage projects, improve project timelines, and control costs. To do this, we are exploring innovative and non-traditional methods such as:


  • Progressive Design-Build (PDB): The project scope and price are developed in stages collaboratively between the Government and the Design-Build firm as a team. The team work closely together to define the project before setting a final price, and allows for the Design-Build firm to progress to construction, non-competitively.
  • Other Transaction Authority (OTA) as a procurement method for the Government: A flexible U.S. Government contracting method that allows for faster and more innovative solutions, by reducing some standard contracting rules. Agreements resulting from OTA is legally binding instrument, other than a procurement contract, that is not subject to FAR and supplements. It enables commercial style business arrangements.
  • Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR): A delivery method in which the constructor joins the design process early, collaborating with the designer to establish a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and completes construction.

*See supplemental information attached to this notice.


We invite all interested companies in design, engineering, construction, architecture-engineering, and project management with relevant experience and expertise in Korea. This includes companies with strong experience in private sector or Korean Government projects. You do not need prior experience with the U.S. Government or with our acquisition procedures. We want to learn about your successful methods and how they work.


2. Information Requested


To help USACE FED better understand Korean industry capabilities and prepare for a meaningful and productive Reverse Industry Day on 6 October 2026, the Government has identified the questions and discussion topics below for consideration by industry.


These questions represent areas that USACE FED may discuss with industry during the Reverse Industry Day. Interested companies are encouraged to review the questions in advance, consider how their experience and capabilities relate to these topics, and come prepared to share their perspectives, experiences, lessons learned, and recommendations during the event.


Companies are not required to provide written responses to every question. The intent is to provide industry with advance visibility into the Government's areas of interest and allow participants sufficient time to prepare for a meaningful Government-industry exchange.


Company Details


  • Company name, address, and website.
  • Main point of contact (name, title, email, and phone number).
  • Provide a brief description of your company's primary business areas, capabilities, and specialized expertise.
  • How many years has your company been involved in design and/or construction?
  • Has your company previously performed work for the U.S. Government? Prior U.S. Government experience is not required.
  • Describe your company's capability and experience in delivering large or complex design and construction projects in Korea.

Experience with Innovative Project Delivery Methods


  • Does your company have experience with any of the following methods or similar Korean commercial or government practices?
    • Design-Build (DB)
    • Progressive Design-Build (PDB)
    • Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)
    • Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements or similar flexible contracting approaches
    • Other innovative, collaborative, or accelerated project delivery methods used in Korea
  • If applicable, please briefly describe your experience, including examples of projects where these approaches were successfully used.

Industrialized Construction Methodologies


USACE FED is interested in understanding Korean industry's capabilities and experience with industrialized, modular, prefabricated, and other innovative construction methodologies.


  • Please describe your company's capabilities and experience with any of the following:
    • Volumetric modular construction;
    • Prefabricated building components or systems manufactured off-site and assembled on-site;
    • Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings (PEMB);
    • Tension Fabric Structures;
    • Additive manufacturing (3D printing) for construction; and
    • Other innovative or industrialized construction methodologies.
  • Please describe your company's experience or capability to provide:
    • Maintenance facilities using Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings;
    • Aircraft hangars using Tension Fabric Structures; and
    • Barracks, child development centers, kennels, or other repeatable facility types using volumetric modular construction, prefabricated components, 3D printing, or similar methods.
  • What other construction capabilities or methodologies could provide greater flexibility or strategic agility by allowing facilities to be expanded, repurposed, relocated, or otherwise adapted as mission requirements change? Please identify the types of facilities for which these approaches may be suitable.
  • To what extent are the materials, components, equipment, and specialized labor necessary for these construction methodologies available in Korea?
  • If your company has completed projects using these methodologies, please describe the results, including, as applicable:
    • Schedule or time savings;
    • Cost benefits;
    • Quality and performance;
    • Customer satisfaction;
    • Challenges encountered and lessons learned; and
    • Any limitations or circumstances in which the methodology may not be appropriate.

Korean Best Practices


  • Based on your experience, what design, construction, acquisition, or project delivery practices have been particularly successful in Korea that USACE FED should consider for future projects? Please explain why these practices have been successful.
  • Are there U.S. Government requirements, processes, or practices that you believe could create challenges or barriers to implementing these approaches? If so, please identify the potential challenges and suggest possible alternatives or approaches that USACE FED should consider.

3. Industry Questions, Concerns, and Suggested Discussion Topics


In addition to considering the Government's questions above, USACE FED encourages companies to identify and submit their own questions, concerns, challenges, recommendations, or suggested topics for discussion prior to the Reverse Industry Day.


USACE FED is particularly interested in industry's perspectives regarding innovative or non-traditional contracting and project delivery methods, including any challenges that may affect their successful implementation in Korea.


Industry questions and feedback may address topics such as:


  • Challenges or barriers associated with U.S. Government acquisition, design, or construction processes;
  • Questions or concerns regarding innovative or non-traditional contracting and project delivery methods;
  • Differences between Korean commercial or Government practices and U.S. Government practices that may affect implementation;
  • Barriers Korean companies may encounter when participating in U.S. Government projects;
  • Opportunities to improve communication, collaboration, and early industry involvement;
  • Recommendations for improving project delivery timelines, cost control, quality, flexibility, or efficiency;
  • Recommendations for adapting successful Korean industry practices for use on U.S. Government projects; and
  • Any other questions, concerns, or topics that industry believes would contribute to a productive discussion.

Companies are highly encouraged to submit any questions, concerns, or suggested discussion topics in advance, particularly those for which they would like to receive a Government response or clarification during the Reverse Industry Day.


Submission Deadline: 11 September 2026, at 5:00 PM Korean Standard Time (KST).


USACE FED will consider the information received in developing the event agenda and discussion topics and, as appropriate, will address industry questions and concerns during the Reverse Industry Day.


The Government's questions identified in this notice are intended to serve as discussion points and areas of interest rather than a formal questionnaire. Industry participants are encouraged to review these topics before the event and come prepared to discuss relevant capabilities, successful projects, lessons learned, potential challenges, and recommendations.


The overall objective is to promote an open and meaningful exchange between USACE FED and Korean industry and to identify innovative contracting, project delivery, design, and construction approaches that may improve the delivery of future USACE FED projects.


4. Contact Information


Please submit your response to the following email address:


CT-BOBranch@usace.army.mil

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS