Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, September 2 at 2:00 PM EDT

Register Free →

Seaborn Reservoir Project

Active
State & Local

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

General Info

Agency

California → Tulare Irrigation District

NAICS

N/A

Place of Performance

Woodlake, CA

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

(2)

TID Seaborn Reservoir Project_NOC_signed OCR

PDF

TID Seaborn Notice of Scoping Meeting_F

PDF

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

What is UCF?

Uniform Contract Format (UCF) uses AI to break down any contract into standardized sections—scope, pricing, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.

Timeline

Posted

forecast

Ready to pursue this opportunity?

Start your free trial to track this contract, build proposals with AI assistance, and manage your pipeline.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyCalifornia → Tulare Irrigation District
Contacts2 people available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
California → Tulare Irrigation District
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Aaron FakudaChief Executive Officer
Amy M. WilsonPrincipal Planner

Interested Companies (1)

Show more
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Visalia, CA

Full Description

Show more
Alternative A – Seaborn Reservoir Alternative A would consist of developing an internal storage reservoir in an abandoned aggregate mining operation where surface water can be re-regulated (filled and emptied) for use by the Project Owners. The Project would be located on the Seaborn Property approximately one mile southeast of the City of Woodlake. The centroid of the Project is 36°23’39.62” N, 119°4’1.87” W. The approximately 235-acres water storage facility equipped with a bidirectional pipeline, an inlet/outlet structure at McKays Point, an outlet structure into the St. Johns River, and a pump station (see Figure 1). Water diverted from the Kaweah River at McKays Point will flow by gravity through a new pipeline to the Seaborn Reservoir across the adjacent property, which is also owned by the Property Owners. Conveyance features would be installed in the southeast corner of the reservoir area to deliver water to and from the St. Johns River and Kaweah River for use by the Project Owners. The area surrounding the internal reservoir would be restored as a habitat area, including native plants and riparian habitat. Restoration of the habitat area would be completed in collaboration with an entity that specializes in habitat restoration. During construction, non-native plants would be removed, and native plant species would be preserved to the greatest extent feasible. Alternative B-- Kaweah Return Location Alternative B would include all of the same features as Alternative A except the water outlet would be due south to the Kaweah River rather than returning water at the McKays Point Structure. This alternative would also be 290 acres and would include a water storage facility equipped with a pipeline, an inlet at McKays Point, and an outlet that would flow into the Kaweah River (see Figure 1). Water diverted from the Kaweah River at McKays Point would flow via gravity through a new pipeline toward the Seaborn Reservoir. Conveyance features would be installed in the southeast corner of the reservoir to deliver water to and from the Kaweah River for use by the Project Owners. The pipeline south to the Kaweah River for pumped return water is anticipated to require less vertical elevation across the pipeline than in Alternative A, which could potentially lessen long-term pumping costs. All other features associated with Alternative B would be the same as in Alternative A. Alternative C – Land Fallowing Alternative C would not require construction or alter the existing land in the Project area and would instead improve water supply through land fallowing. Land fallowing is a practice that involves leaving farmland unplanted for a year or more to conserve water supplies, particularly groundwater. Some benefits associated with land fallowing include soil restoration, and water conservation. To achieve the target water volume, nearly 2,200 acres (assuming a demand of 3 acre-feet per acre) would need to be fallowed. While Alternative C would reduce water demand, it would not result in the distribution of captured water supply to the Project Owners’ service area. This Alternative would also not provide any flood reduction benefits.