W519TC26RA036 - Special Ammunition and Weapon Systems (SAWS) - Draft Solicitation
Contract Overview
Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.
AI Contract Overview
The Department of Defense has released the third and final draft of the Request for Proposal (RFP) #3 for the acquisition of Special Ammunition and Weapon Systems (SAWS) and Non-NATO Commercial Ammunition. This updated draft incorporates feedback and insights gathered from previous drafts and recent industry engagement events held in March and May 2026. The posting includes revised solicitation documents and a consolidated list of questions and answers to help industry partners better understand the mission requirements. The current phase is focused on refining technical and administrative requirements to ensure clarity and feasibility, and the draft remains non-binding with all details subject to future revisions. Industry participants are invited to provide feedback on specific aspects of the draft, particularly regarding the Minimum Technical Threshold Rating set at 80%, and the types of documentation required as proof of capability. The government has clarified that all submission deadlines refer to calendar days to maintain a uniform timeline. Responses and additional inquiries are to be submitted by June 15, 2026, to the designated contracting representatives Logan Frye and Bethany Carbajal. This solicitation, identified by number W519TC26RA036, is managed by the Department of Defense office in Rock Island, Illinois, with no set-aside requirements, and targets the NAICS code 332993.
General Info
Agency
NAICS
Place of Performance
ILSet-Aside
Timeline
Response Deadline
Organization & Contact Information
Full Description
Edited 7/10/2026 to include SAWS Industry Day Questions and Answers attachment.
____________________________________________________________________
This posting announces the release of Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) #3 for the Special Ammunition and Weapon Systems (SAWS) and Non-NATO Commercial Ammunition acquisition. This third and final draft serves as a direct update to the initial versions posted on March 17, 2026 and April 27, 2026 and specifically incorporates feedback, questions and answers, and insights gained during the industry engagement held on March 24, 2026 and virtual industry event on May 14, 2026. This posting provides updated versions of the draft solicitation and its various attachments, as well as a consolidated list of questions and answers derived from previous industry interactions.
The primary objective of this updated notice is to provide industry partners with a comprehensive understanding of the mission requirements and to gather additional feedback on the content before the formal RFP is finalized. It is important to clarify that the government is not currently soliciting or negotiating formal proposals through this draft. The focus of this phase is strictly on refining the acquisition's technical and administrative requirements to ensure clarity and feasibility. This draft RFP #3 remains non-binding, and all information contained within is subject to further modification based on continued evaluation and industry input.
Throughout the provided documentation, the terms Request for Proposal and solicitation are used synonymously and interchangeably. Furthermore, unless a specific provision states otherwise, any references to the number of days for submissions or contractual requirements refer to calendar days rather than business days. This approach ensures a standard timeline for all participants as the government moves toward the release of the formal solicitation.
The USG is seeking feedback on the following questionnaire regarding Draft RFP #3 to ensure its effectiveness:
1. The Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) is currently set at 80% of the total possible points. Based on your company's experience, would you realistically be able to meet the 80% MTTR? Which categories or specific line items present the most significant challenges to achieving that score?
2. The HTRO Matrix identifies specific types of documentation as proof. Are there alternative work samples or forms of evidence that you believe would also be strong indicators of capability for these categories?
Any additional questions and feedback in addition to the questions/statements provided above and regarding this Draft RFP shall be submitted to the following USG Contracting Representatives:
• Logan Frye, Contract Specialist, Email: logan.e.frye.civ@army.mil
• Bethany Carbajal, Contracting Officer, Email: bethany.n.carbajal.civ@army.mil