2090 WINDOW MARINE

Navsup Fleet Logistics Center Puget Sound awarded a Firm-Fixed-Price purchase order to Gozian Inc. on a sole source basis for one marine window unit, part number KC-LPD-017-03, manufactured by KARAGOZIAN & CASE, under solicitation N0040626Q0258. The acquisition was conducted using Simplified Acquisition Procedures under FAR Part 13 and classified as a commercial product procurement under FAR Part 12, with no small business set-aside. The contract requires full compliance with ASTM-D-3951 for packaging and marking, prohibits certain materials such as asbestos, excelsior, and loose fill polystyrene, and mandates heat-treated non-manufactured wood packaging meeting ALSC standards. The item must be uniquely identified per DFARS 252.211-7003 with DoD-compliant markings conforming to MIL-STD-130 and MIL-STD-129, and must be machine-readable and verifiable using approved automatic identification technology. Delivery is FOB origin, with the Government arranging and bearing all transportation costs through NAVSUP WSS Shipment Processing to the final destination at USN SRF-JRMC SASEBO JAPAN. Acceptance occurs at the destination only after the Government verifies receipt, proper packaging, marking, and labeling, and each package must bear a unique identification number if shipped via UPS or FedEx. Invoicing must be submitted electronically via WAWF, requiring the contractor to maintain an active SAM registration with a designated point of contact and provide a UEI and CAGE code. The contractor must also comply with clauses addressing internal confidentiality agreements, contractor identification, prohibition of contracting with inverted domestic corporations, security prohibitions, and representations concerning telecommunications equipment, business operations with the Maduro regime, and procurement from Xinjiang. The contract incorporates all required FAR and DFARS clauses with deviations effective February and April 2026. All quotations were required to include the entire scope, and failure to do so rendered the quote unacceptable. The award was based on best value, with price and past performance considered, though exact pricing and contract value are not disclosed.