Blueprint SD Initiative, Hillcrest Focused Plan Amendment to the Uptown Community Plan, and University Community Plan and Local Coastal Program Update

The project involves the division of a 12.88-acre parcel located at 4577 and 4589 La Jolla Village Drive in San Diego into ten individual parcels, with no new development proposed. The site is situated within the Employment Mixed-Use (EMX-3) base zone and subject to multiple overlay zones including Airport Land Use Compatibility, ALUCP Airport Influence Area, Transit Priority Area, Community Plan Implementation, and Parking Standards Transit Priority Area. It is designated as Urban Village High-3 under the University Community Plan. The work is part of broader planning initiatives including the Blueprint SD Initiative, Hillcrest Focused Plan Amendment, and updates to the University Community Plan and Local Coastal Program. All activities are governed by state and local environmental compliance standards under CEQA, with requirements tied to the City of San Diego’s Climate Action Plan, CALGreen, California Energy Code, and specific CEQA thresholds for air quality, noise, and greenhouse gas emissions. The lead agency is the City of San Diego Planning Department, with oversight responsibilities and public filings coordinated through the San Diego County Clerk’s office for recordation and receipt of payments. No new construction or physical improvements are included, and the effort focuses exclusively on land division and regulatory alignment. Payment processing is handled by the San Diego County Clerk’s office, with receipts issued for fee payments tied to environmental documentation submittals, though no formal invoicing system such as WAWF or IPP is referenced. Contract administration details are sparse—no Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Representative, or Procurement Contracting Officer are identified, and no award evaluation factors, commercial clauses, or procurement-specific terms such as contract type, pricing, or delivery schedules are present. Similarly, no representations or certifications from offerors including UEI, CAGE codes, or socioeconomic status are documented. Attachments referenced include technical reports on biological, cultural, and historic resources, as well as resumes and confidential materials, but none of these are formally labeled as contract deliverables under a binding procurement structure. The work appears to be a regulatory and planning action rather than a traditional service or supply contract, relying on internal city permitting, environmental review processes, and land use approvals to achieve its objectives. There is no defined period of performance, fob terms, or delivery schedule, and the total contract value remains unspecified. The effort is fundamentally a land use entitlement and compliance process executed under municipal authority, supported by environmental documentation and public records, rather than a federally regulated acquisition under FAR standards.