CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMB

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded The Boeing Company a contract modification, SPE7M526F0137, under the basic delivery order SPE4A125G0009, for the procurement of a single Circuit Card Assembly identified by NSN 5998011353522 and PR 7012718081, at a total value of $20,494.12. The award was issued on July 21, 2026, following a solicitation dated SPE7M0-25-T-062R, with a response deadline of June 30, 2025. The contract performance location is The Boeing Company’s facility in Hazelwood, Missouri, and the supplying activity is DLA Land and Maritime’s Maritime Supply Chain branch, with payments to be processed through PO Box 3990, Columbus, Ohio. Despite the low dollar value and single-line-item structure, the contract is governed by strict federal compliance requirements, primarily through the inclusion of FAR 52.222-90, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” implemented under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1. This clause mandates that The Boeing Company prohibit racially discriminatory DEI practices in hiring, promotions, and subcontracting, report any known violations by subcontractors, flow the clause down to all U.S.-based subcontracts, and notify the Contracting Officer of any legal challenges to its validity. Compliance with this provision is deemed material to payment under 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(4), and the contractor must provide full access to records upon request. Packaging, marking, and preservation of the delivered item are expected to conform to standard Department of Defense practices, implicitly requiring adherence to MIL-STD-129 for shipment labeling and MIL-STD-2073 for preservation, though these standards are not explicitly cited in the documentation. Required markings include the NSN, CAGE code 0PXV4, and contract number, with no additional labeling specifications provided. The contract does not specify delivery schedules, FOB terms, inspection location, or acceptance criteria, and no quality assurance metrics or technical specifications beyond the part number are included. No attachments, evaluation factors, or source selection criteria are present in the available documentation, suggesting the award was likely made on a Lowest