Compliance Performance Monitoring RFQ260160

Offerors must review the attached documents, follow the instructions provided, and submit all the required documentation via OhioBuys. All bids and inquiries must come through OhioBuys. The solicitation adheres to the dates provided in OhioBuys. If any RFQ changes is necessary, such information will be posted in OhioBuys as well. OHIOBUYS TRAINING MATERIALSOhioBuys training materials can be located at this site https://procure.ohio.gov/bidders-and-suppliers/resources/03_Using+OhioBuys To participate or submit an inquiry for this RFx, you need to be registered in the OhioBuys Supplier Portal. Suppliers are not required at this time to be registered in OAKS. If you have a need to seek technical support, clearly specify you need access to an active Ohio Buys solicitation.Technical Support 1-877-644-6771If there is a need for technical support during your proposal submission in the last 48 hours prior to the submissions, contact 614-466-5090. This number is for OhioBuys solicitation technical questions only; there will not be any questions answered regarding the solicitation.
**THIS SOLICITATION IS CANCELLED**The Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) is soliciting competitive proposals from qualified vendors to provide an Compliance Performance Monitoring Solution. The awarded vendor will be expected to deliver a secure, scalable, and cost-effective solution that supports BWC's operational, security and compliance needs. All bidders must submit complete proposals in accordance with the requirements outlined in the attached Request for Quotes (RFQ). Quotes tthat fail to include the required documentation or deviate from the specified instructions may be disqualified. Inquiries must be submitted exclusively through OhioBuys and only during the inquiry period.Late Submissions will not be accepted. Vendors are responsible for monitoring OhioBuys for any possible updates, clarifications and adenda to this solicitation.
Audit software
Inquiries Inquiry 87586 | Is GenAI assisted drafting functionality currently permitted for use within the internal audit function, provided all audit judgment and final conclusions remain human driven? Or, is this a long term goal? Is availability of GenAI functionality within a FedRAMP authorized environment a mandatory requirement for this procurement, or is phased availability acceptable? Would the absence of GenAI capabilities in a FedRAMP authorized environment in the near term be considered a material disqualifier? Is the primary intent of the selected platform to support internal audit execution and documentation, rather than serve as a broader enterprise GRC or analytics solution? Is standardization of audit workflows across engagements prioritized over extensive engagement level customization? Is integration with existing analytics and reporting tools preferred over replacing those tools within the audit platform? Is use of an established public sector procurement vehicle, such as Carahsoft (e.g., NASPO), acceptable for contracting? If so, would you be open to a one week extention to allow time to partner on a response? | Answer: Is GenAI assisted drafting functionality currently permitted for use within the internal audit function, provided all audit judgment and final conclusions remain human driven? Or, is this a long term goal? All GenAI requirements listed in section 2.3 can be considered optional. If a vendor cannot currently meet the State’s requirements for GenAI security, this is not a disqualifier and Client would be open to incorporating those capabilities in the future. Is availability of GenAI functionality within a FedRAMP authorized environment a mandatory requirement for this procurement, or is phased availability acceptable? Phased availability is acceptable for this functionality. Client is willing to defer use of GenAI capabilities until the selected vendor can implement them in the required environment. Would the absence of GenAI capabilities in a FedRAMP authorized environment in the near term be considered a material disqualifier? This is not a material disqualifier. Client is willing to defer use of GenAI capabilities until the selected vendor can implement them in the required environment. Is the primary intent of the selected platform to support internal audit execution and documentation, rather than serve as a broader enterprise GRC or analytics solution? To clarify: Client performs external audit functions, not internal audit. If the question is whether the solution would be widely used across the Agency, the answer is No. Use would be limited to supporting the auditing activity of one department within the Agency. Is standardization of audit workflows across engagements prioritized over extensive engagement level customization? Standardization is the priority, although some amount of customization will be necessary. For example, one auditee is under a different contract than the other entities being audited by the Client. Is integration with existing analytics and reporting tools preferred over replacing those tools within the audit platform? If “existing analytics and reporting tools” refers to systems used to prepare and analyze sample datasets for audit programs, then Yes, integration is preferred If the solution includes native risk analysis tools, Client may be interested in leveraging those. Is use of an established public sector procurement vehicle, such as Carahsoft (e.g., NASPO), acceptable for contracting? If so, would you be open to a one week extention to allow time to partner on a response? Client has no problem working with Carahsoft or similar contracting vehicles but is unable to extend the deadline to accommodate that. | Answered: 4/17/2026