Department of Labor (DOL) Dry Cleaning Services Contract

Amendment 000002 of Solicitation Number DOL-OPS-15-R-00057: Department of Labor (DOL) Dry Cleaning Services Contract. The purpose of Amendment 000002 of Solicitation Number DOL-OPS-15-R-00057 is to: 1. Extend the Due Date for proposals. The new Due Date for proposals is as follows: Friday, September 04, 2015, no later than 12:00 PM EST. 2. Change the competition requirements as follows: FROM: 100% Women Owned Small Business Set-Aside. TO: 100% Small Business Set-Aside. 3. Attach / Upload "Questions and Answers" submitted in response to Solicitation Number DOL-OPS-15-R-00057. 4. Attach / Upload a revised Statement of Work (SOW) dated 08-21-2015, which incorporates all edits / changes generated from the "Questions and Answers" provided. Amendment 000001 of Solicitation Number DOL-OPS-15-R-00057: Department of Labor (DOL) Dry Cleaning Services Contract. The purpose of Amendment 000001 of Solicitation Number DOL-OPS-15-R-00057 is to extend the Due Date for proposals. The new Due Date for proposals is as follows: Friday, August 21, 2015, no later than 5:00 PM EST. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The combined synopsis/solicitation information is as follows: (1.) Solicitation Number: DOL-OPS-15-R-00057 This solicitation is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP). (2.) The solicitation and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-83, dated July 02, 2015. (3.) The requirement shall be posted under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code of 812320 - Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated). The Small Business Size Standard for NAICS Code 812320 is $5.5 Million. The requirement for Dry Cleaning Services shall be competed as a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. (4.) Required Services: Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) / Quantity / Unit of Measure Base Year: October 01, 2015 through September 30, 2016 CLIN 0001 - Dry Cleaning Services In exchange for the services specified in the Statement of Work (SOW), the Contractor shall reimburse the Government a Firm Fixed amount per month to cover Building Management operating expenses associated with the Dry Cleaning facility located in the Department of Labor (DOL) Frances Perkins Building. Quantity: 12 Unit of Measure: Month Option Year 1: October 01, 2016 through September 30, 2017 CLIN 1001 - Dry Cleaning Services In exchange for the services specified in the Statement of Work (SOW), the Contractor shall reimburse the Government a Firm Fixed amount per month to cover Building Management operating expenses associated with the Dry Cleaning facility located in the Department of Labor (DOL) Frances Perkins Building. Quantity: 12 Unit of Measure: Month Option Year 2: October 01, 2017 through September 30, 2018 CLIN 2001 - Dry Cleaning Services In exchange for the services specified in the Statement of Work (SOW), the Contractor shall reimburse the Government a Firm Fixed amount per month to cover Building Management operating expenses associated with the Dry Cleaning facility located in the Department of Labor (DOL) Frances Perkins Building. Quantity: 12 Unit of Measure: Month Option Year 3: October 01, 2018 through September 30, 2019 CLIN 3001 - Dry Cleaning Services In exchange for the services specified in the Statement of Work (SOW), the Contractor shall reimburse the Government a Firm Fixed amount per month to cover Building Management operating expenses associated with the Dry Cleaning facility located in the Department of Labor (DOL) Frances Perkins Building. Quantity: 12 Unit of Measure: Month Option Year 4: October 01, 2019 through September 30, 2020 CLIN 4001 - Dry Cleaning Services In exchange for the services specified in the Statement of Work (SOW), the Contractor shall reimburse the Government a Firm Fixed amount per month to cover Building Management operating expenses associated with the Dry Cleaning facility located in the Department of Labor (DOL) Frances Perkins Building. Quantity: 12 Unit of Measure: Month (5.) Description of requirements for the items to be acquired - Dry Cleaning Services to support the Department of Labor (DOL) Frances Perkins Building. Please note that the Government anticipates the award of one (1) Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Concessionaire Contract which requires a monthly payment to the Government in lieu of rent and other operational costs associated with the Dry Cleaning facility located within the Frances Perkins Building. For additional information, please refer to the attached Statement of Work (SOW). (6.) Date(s) and place(s) of delivery- The anticipated Period of Performance shall be for one (1) twelve (12) month Base Year and four (4) 12-month Option Years. The anticipated Period of Performance is as follows: Base Year: October 01, 2015 - September 30, 2016 Option Year One (1): October 01, 2016 - September 30, 2017 Option Year Two (2): October 01, 2017 - September 30, 2018 Option Year Three (3): October 01, 2018 - September 30, 2019 Option Year Four (4): October 01, 2019 - September 30, 2020 The Government anticipates that work shall be completed on-site at a Government facility (Frances Perkins Building). (7.) The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial, applies to this acquisition. The Addenda to FAR 52.212-1 is as follows: 1. INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS - GENERAL a. Offerors are expected to examine this entire solicitation document. Failure to do so will be at the Offeror's own risk. b. Offerors shall furnish the information required by this solicitation. c. Interested Offerors shall submit both an original and redacted proposal. Please note that a separate cover sheet shall accompany your redacted proposal that contains your company's contact information. d. OFFEROR CODES: Interested Offerors shall contact the Contract Specialist at contact@example.gov to obtain an alphanumeric Offeror code as its identification code during the procurement process. This code is to be used throughout your proposal in lieu of your company's name or logo. The code shall be clearly identified on each Volume of your proposal. Please note that a separate cover sheet shall accompany your redacted proposal that contains your company's contact information. Offerors may propose any code convention for any Subcontractors as long as the code is used consistenly throughout the proposal. e. The Government intends to make an award based on initial offers received, without discussion of such offers. Accordingly, each initial offer should be submitted in as complete form as possible and without exception to any provision. During the evaluation process, the Government may, at its discretion enter into clarifications or communications as needed. The Government need not enter into communications or clarifications with all Offerors. In evaluating the proposals, the Government may establish a Competitive Range to reduce the Offerors participating in the competition to only those Offerors most likely to receive the award. Any Offeror eliminated from further consideration will be notified officially in writing. Discussions: If the Government enters into discussions, it will be with those Offerors considered to be within the Competitive Range. During the negotiation process all proposal revisions must be submitted electronically in MS Word track changes format and accompanied by a complete electronic resubmission of the electronic file. f. The Government will not pay any Offeror for preparation of their proposal. g. The Government assumes no liability for disclosure or use of unmarked data and may use or disclose the data for any purpose. Unless restricted, information submitted in response to this request may become subject to disclosure to the public pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 USC. 551). h. Proposals shall set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this solicitation package (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 USC. 1001. i. The Government intends to make a single award resulting from this RFP. j. All rules, policies, procedures and standards of FAR Part 15 are expressly not applicable to this acquisition, but some specific FAR Part 15 procedures may, at the Government's discretion, be used in the evaluation process. k. A team of Government personnel will evaluate the proposals. Price will be evaluated but will not be scored or rated. l. Contractors shall be required to follow all applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, as well as all terms and conditions contained in the resulting contract. m. Prices and pricing information must not be included in any part of the non-price proposal. 2. SUBMISSION OF SOLICITATION QUESTIONS Communications and questions concerning this solicitation shall be submitted via email to the Contract Specialist, James Johnson at: contact@example.gov. Offeror questions should be grouped by solicitation section and make reference to the particular Section/subsection number. THE DUE DATE FOR QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS CONCERNING THIS RFP is Friday, July 31, 2015, 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time. Questions or requests for extension submitted after the cut-off date may not be considered. Questions shall not be marked with a restrictive legend and shall not include proprietary information. Electronic mail attachments, if included, shall be prepared using Microsoft Office. When submitting questions and comments, please refer to the specific text of the RFP in the following format: Subject: RFP No. DOL-OPS-15-R-00057 Reference: RFP Section ___, Paragraph(s) ____, Page(s) ____. All questions will be answered via e-mail and will be provided to all potential Offerors by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Specialist. 3. PROPOSAL PREPARATION & ORGANIZATION To be considered for award, an Offeror shall submit a proposal in accordance with the instructions of this solicitation. The Offeror shall submit one (1) ORIGINAL and one (1) REDACTED electronic copy via e-mail to the Contract Specialist at: contact@example.gov. Failure to submit redacted copies of the proposal may result in a finding that the proposal is not acceptable. Each MS Word and MS Excel Worksheet electronic page setup of the proposal shall be 8 " x 11", including a minimum of - inch margins on all four sides of each page within a file sequentially page numbered in the center of the footer. The maximum number of lines of text per page is forty-five. Each Volume shall use the file name and be of the type indicated by the file extension below. Type fonts shall be not less than 10 point, except in graphics where it shall be large enough to be legible. The Volumes are arranged by the Factors used to evaluate the proposal. Each proposal shall contain, at a minimum, the information required for that particular Volume. No classified data shall be submitted as part of the proposal. The expected period of this contract is one (1) Base Year of twelve (12) months; and four (4) twelve (12) month Option Years. 4. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL a. Proposal Due Date and Time ALL PROPOSAL VOLUMES MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE GOVERNMENT BY 12:00 P.M. EASTERN TIME ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 04, 2015. b. Proposal Submission Proposals shall be submitted electronically via email to: James Johnson, Contract Specialist at: contact@example.gov. HARD COPIES ARE NOT AUTHORIZED OR REQUIRED. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VENDOR TO ENSURE THE RECEIPT OF ALL PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO THE CLOSING DATE. c. Proposal Volumes There is no page limit for proposal volumes. The proposal volumes are as follows: VOLUME 1 - Technical Approach VOLUME 2 - Past Performance VOLUME 3 - Price List Offerors shall format the electronic file name for submitted proposal volumes as follows: XXXX_FPBDC_V1_.doc XXXX_ FPBDC_V2_.doc XXXX_ FPBDC_V3_.doc For "XXXX" Offerors shall use the Offeror Code Provided. d. Proposal Content The Offeror's proposal shall be formatted as set forth in the table above and shall contain its proposal response to the requirements herein. The proposal shall be clear, concise and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements. The Government will base its evaluation exclusively on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal, with the exception of the Past Performance volume where the Government reserves the right to base the evaluation on information obtained from other sources. i. Volume 1 - Technical Approach The Offeror shall provide a complete and detailed description of its ability to deliver all the services described in the SOW. The Offeror must demonstrate a clear understanding of the scope of work and requirements including the quality, feasibility, practicability, innovativeness, and appropriateness in accomplishing tasks and deliverables of this contract from a technical perspective. The Offeror shall provide a complete and detailed description of any unique, innovative approach to providing quality Dry Cleaning Services such as the use of new Dry Cleaning technology, professional "Wet Cleaning" methods, Liquid Carbon Dioxide (CO2) cleaning methods, or Petroleum-Free Dry Cleaning methods. Unfounded assertions and general marketing statements will not contribute to a favorable evaluation. The technical proposal may include any metrics and incentives or disincentives proposed by the Offeror. The Offeror shall include the staffing strategy, the experience, skill, and qualifications of proposed personnel, as well as the ability of the overall project team to adequately minimize risk and successfully complete requirements of the SOW. The quality of the Dry Cleaning services proposed is very important. The Offeror shall submit a draft Quality Control Plan with the Technical Approach Volume. The final Quality Control Plan shall be submitted within sixty (60) days after contract award. ii. Volume 2 - Past Performance NOTE: The submission of Past Performance Questionnaires is not required. Offerors shall ensure that the Past Performance information is submitted in an original and redacted format. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), Offerors without relevant past performance experience, or for whom information on past performance is not available, shall not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Offerors must provide a minimum of three (3) Past Performance descriptions to include the following: name of reference; person's title; agency; telephone / cell phone number; e-mail address; contract / order number; contract type; description of work performed; whether or not the contract was performed as a Prime or Subcontractor; and total dollar value. NOTE ON SUBCONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE: If the Offeror submits Past Performance information for work performed as a Subcontractor, then the Past Performance point of contact shall be the Prime Contractor NOT the resulting Customer for whom the services were performed. Offerors shall submit a total of three (3) contract references which are recent and relevant. A recent contract is one which is currently being performed, or which was performed, for a minimum of twelve (12) months within the last three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Relevant contracts are defined as efforts that are the same as, or similar to, the scope of the efforts required by this solicitation. The contracts identified shall demonstrate the Offeror's performance, or responsibility for performance, of work of similar size and scope to the work outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). The Government may also utilize the Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPAR) contained in the Government's Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) to evaluate Past Performance. iii. Volume 3 - Price Proposal Since this procurement will result in a Concessionaire Contract, Offerors shall provide the Firm Fixed Price monthly payment amount, as well as the yearly total for the Base Year and each Option Year. Offerors shall also provide the Grand Total amount proposed for the entire contract (Base Year plus all Option Years). In addition to the Firm Fixed Price monthly payment amount, Offerors are required to submit a Price List / Schedule. The Price List / Schedule shall contain the prices associated with Dry Cleaning services such as the price to Dry Clean a shirt, dress, pants, suit, uniform, etc. The Price List / Schedule shall also include the prices associated with alterations. Offerors are free to use a variety of formats (tables, spreadsheets, charts, etc.) to submit the Price Proposal as long as one (1) version of the Price Proposal is submitted in an editable format (such as Microsoft Word, Excel, or other editable format). Prices and pricing information must not be included in any part of the non-price proposal. All Offerors shall utilize an estimated start date of October 01, 2015. (8.) The evaluation procedures to be used are as follows: BASIS FOR AWARD (a) The Government will use a Best Value Tradeoff process to make the award decision. The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value after evaluation in accordance with the following Factors: Factor I - Technical Approach Factor II - Past Performance Factor III - Price (b) Offerors are cautioned that an award may not necessarily be made to the Offeror proposing the highest price; or, if non-price Factors are evaluated as comparatively equal between two or more Offerors, price may become a determinative factor. FACTORS AND THEIR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE (a) RELATIVE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE TERMINOLOGY. An evaluation of all offers will be made in accordance with the criteria set forth below. The evaluation criteria consists of Factors. In order to provide the Offeror with an understanding of the significance assigned by the Government, the Factors are assigned a relative order of importance. The following terminology is used: (1) Significantly More Important. The Factor or Sub-factor is substantially more important than another Factor or Sub-factor. The Factor or Sub-factor is given far more consideration than another factor or sub-factor. (2) More Important. The factor or sub-factor is greater in value than another factor, but not as much as a significantly more important factor or sub-factor. The factor or sub-factor is given more consideration than another factor or sub-factor. (3) Equal. The factor or sub-factor is the same in value as another factor or sub-factor. (b) RELATIVE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS. (1) Factor Order of Importance a) The Technical Approach Factor is significantly more important than the Past Performance Factor. b) The Past Performance Factor is More Important than the Price Factor. c) All non-Price evaluation factors, when combined, are Significantly More Important than the Price Factor. EVALUATION APPROACH All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by a team of Government personnel. EVALUATION CRITERIA FACTOR I - Technical Approach The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical approach on its quality, feasibility, practicability, innovativeness, and appropriateness in accomplishing the tasks and deliverables of this contract from a technical perspective. The Government will also evaluate the Offerors on the clarity of their approach and their ability to convey to the Government their understanding of and ability to perform the requirements of this SOW. The Government will evaluate the any unique, innovative approach to providing quality Dry Cleaning Services proposed by the Offeror, such as the use of new Dry Cleaning technology, professional "Wet Cleaning" methods, Liquid Carbon Dioxide (CO2) cleaning methods, or Petroleum-Free Dry Cleaning methods. The Government will also evaluate the Quality Control Plan and the extent to which potential risks are identified and mitigated for all elements described in the SOW. The Offeror shall address all requirements for the Technical Approach Factor and demonstrate the ability to meet or exceed the requirements of the solicitation. In order to provide the Offeror with an understanding of the value assigned by the Government, the criteria are being included below. From those single ratings, an overall rating will be determined. The following adjectival rating scale / descriptions will be used to evaluate Factor I - Technical Approach. Outstanding - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low. Good - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low. Acceptable - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. Marginal - Proposal does not clearly meet all requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet all requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Evaluation of Proposal's Risk: The Government will consider risk in the evaluation of proposals. The following risk definitions will be used as general guidance in assessing the level of risk presented by each proposal. LOW RISK - The Offeror's proposed solution presents little or no risk and is anticipated to have a minimal adverse impact on scope, schedule, cost, and/or contract performance. Normal Contractor effort and Government monitoring will mitigate potential difficulties. Minimum doubt exists that the Offeror can satisfactorily perform the proposed effort. MODERATE RISK - The Offeror's proposed solution presents some risk and is anticipated to have a moderate adverse impact on scope, schedule, cost, and/or contract performance. Special Contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will mitigate potential difficulties. Some doubt exists that the Offeror can satisfactorily perform the proposed effort. HIGH RISK - The Offeror's proposed solution presents significant risk and is anticipated to have significant adverse impact on scope, schedule, cost, and/or contract performance. Special Contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will not mitigate potential difficulties. Significant doubt exists that the Offeror can satisfactorily perform the proposed effort. FACTOR II - Past Performance Past Performance shall be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305. The offer will be evaluated on the currency, size, scope, and responsibilities of the Offeror in engagements relevant to the requirements of this contract. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), Offerors without relevant Past Performance experience, or for whom information on Past Performance is not available, shall not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on Past Performance. The Government will evaluate Past Performance information submitted by the Offeror. The Government may also use references and other sources such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) when evaluating Past Performance. Offerors will be evaluated on the extent and quality of their own corporate Past Performance (including that of established affiliates, subsidiaries, units or divisions of the Offeror's own company or parent company that are being proposed to support this effort). As such, the Offeror's own corporate Past Performance (as a Prime Contractor) will be weighed significantly more heavily than the Offeror's experience as a Subcontractor. After reviewing all recent and relevant Past Performance references, assessing the Offeror's quality of performance under those references, and considering all other sources of Past Performance data, the Government will use the adjectival ratings below to provide an overall Past Performance confidence assessment rating: Substantial Confidence - Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence - Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Limited Confidence - Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence - Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Unknown Confidence (Neutral) - No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. FACTOR III - Price The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by evaluating prices for the Base Year and Option Years. Offers that do not include prices for the Option Years may be rejected and may not be considered further for award. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the options. Additionally, the Government will also evaluate offers for award purposes by evaluating the Price List / Schedule submitted by Offerors. The Price/Cost proposed will be evaluated, but not scored. The Contracting Officer and the Price Evaluation Team will use all methods available to evaluate the proposed prices. Price evaluation will commence upon final consensus ratings of the technical evaluation. The Contracting Officer (CO) and the Price Evaluation Team will review and evaluate the price proposals. The prices proposed will not be scored. Each Offeror's price/cost proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the proposal observes reasonableness and realism. As part of its evaluation, the Government will consider the Firm Fixed Price totals for the Base Year and Option Years, as well as the Price List / Schedule submitted with the Offeror's proposed price/cost proposal. Prices will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness using the techniques in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2). The price evaluation may consider some or all of the following: 1. Comparison to other Offeror's proposals 2. Comparison to historical data 3. Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items No adjectival ratings will be used to evaluate Price. (9.) All Offerors shall include a completed copy of the provision at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items, with its offer. (10.) FAR Clause 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items, shall apply to this acquisition by reference-no addenda shall be attached. (11.) FAR Clause 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items, shall apply to this acquisition. Specifically, the following FAR Clauses shall apply: 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JUN 2014) (a) The Contractor shall comply with the following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, which are incorporated in this contract by reference, to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: (1) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (FEB 2009) (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). Alternate I (AUG 2007) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C. 7104 (g)). (2) 52.233-3, Protest After Award (Aug 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553). (3) 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (Oct 2004) (Pub. L. 108-77, 108-78) (b) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (b) that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: [X] (1) 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with Alternate I (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 253g and 10 U.S.C. 2402). [X] (2) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (APR 2010)(Pub. L. 110-252, Title VI, Chapter 1 (41 U.S.C. 251 note)). [] (3) 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (JUN 2010) (Section 1553 of Pub. L. 111-5). (Applies to contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.) [X] (4) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jul 2013) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note). [] (5) 52.204-11, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act-Reporting Requirements (JUL 2010) (Pub. L. 111-5). [X] (6) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Aug 2013) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note). [] (7) 52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jul 2013) (41 U.S.C. 2313). [X] (8) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (MAY 2012) (section 738 of Division C of Pub. L. 112-74, section 740 of Division C of Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Division D of Pub. L. 111-8, and section 745 of Division D of Pub. L. 110-161). [] (9) 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole Source Award (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 657a). [] (10) 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (JAN 2011) (if the offeror elects to waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C. 657a). [] (11) [Reserved] [X] (12)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644). [] (ii) Alternate I (NOV 2011). [] (iii) Alternate II (NOV 2011). [] (13)(i) 52.219-7, Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside (June 2003) (15 U.S.C. 644). [] (ii) Alternate I (Oct 1995) of 52.219-7. [] (iii) Alternate II (Mar 2004) of 52.219-7. [X] (14) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)). [] (15)(i) 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)). [] (ii) Alternate I (Oct 2001) of 52.219-9. [] (iii) Alternate II (Oct 2001) of 52.219-9. [] (iv) Alternate III (JUL 2010) of 52.219-9. [] (16) 52.219-13, Notice of Set-Aside of Orders (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)). [] (17) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14)). [] (18) 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages--Subcontracting Plan (Jan 1999) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(F)(i)). [] (19)(i) 52.219-23, Notice of Price Evaluation Adjustment for Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns (OCT 2008) (10 U.S.C. 2323) (if the offeror elects to waive the adjustment, it shall so indicate in its offer.) [] (ii) Alternate I (June 2003) of 52.219-23. [] (20) 52.219-25, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program--Disadvantaged Status and Reporting (Jul 2013) (Pub. L. 103-355, section 7102, and 10 U.S.C. 2323). [] (21) 52.219-26, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program--Incentive Subcontracting (Oct 2000) (Pub. L. 103-3...