Patio Furniture, delivery and installation for PGM Golf Building

Coastal Carolina University is soliciting bids to provide, deliver, and install patio furniture for the PGM Golf Building under solicitation number CCU-9300805, with proposals due by July 17, 2026. The procurement is managed by the university’s South Carolina office, with Tracy O’Keefe listed as the primary point of contact for inquiries. While the contract description focuses on patio furniture, the supporting documentation reveals a broader scope encompassing event-related infrastructure including portable restrooms, folding tables and chairs, shower and sink units, generator rentals, and VIP trailers—suggesting the furniture request may be part of a larger event services package. The solicitation explicitly allows alternatives to requirements and permits resident contractor and subcontractor preferences of 2% or 4%, which will influence bid evaluations but does not otherwise reference federal socioeconomic set-asides or small business certifications. All submissions must be submitted via the SCBO online portal using PDF format and must include the completed cover page and page 2 of the solicitation, along with certification of compliance with submission guidelines to avoid being deemed non-responsive. The contract term is anticipated to be three years, with pricing structured as daily rental rates applied across projected usage volumes, though no unit costs or total estimated values are provided in the solicitation documents. Delivery is governed by FOB Destination terms, with performance limited to South Carolina. Inspection and acceptance are implied to occur at the destination, with responsibility resting on the contractor to provide a factual basis of work completion, though formal quality standards or inspection criteria are not delineated. Packaging, marking, barcoding, and MIL-STD requirements are absent. While Section H and Section M are not fully defined in the available materials, the solicitation mandates full compliance without modification to terms, requires disclosure of all subcontractors and their percentage of work, and stipulates that only bids meeting procedural, formatting, and residency preference rules will be considered for award. The evaluation basis appears cost-driven with preference adjustments, but no formal weighting or trade-off methodology is published. No designated COR, COTR, or PCO are identified, and payment methods, accounting codes, or invoicing systems are unspecified, indicating a streamlined, institution-level procurement without full federal contract administration structures.