Verizon Philip Road Minor Use Permit (PLN25-00261)

The project involves a minor modification to an existing 78-foot lattice tower located in Roseville, California, with the addition of a 20-foot extension and the installation of nine antennas, six radios, four surge suppressors, and four hybrid cables. This change is being pursued under a Minor Use Permit application numbered PLN25-00261, submitted to the Placer County Community Development Resource Agency. The action is categorized as a Class 3 categorical exemption under CEQA Section 15303, which exempts small-scale construction or conversion projects with minimal environmental impact, and must comply with Placer County Code Section 18.36.050 governing wireless telecommunications facilities. The permitting process is administrative and based on regulatory compliance rather than competitive procurement, meaning no cost evaluations, technical scoring, or contract award mechanisms apply. The project site is at 3855 Pettigrew Road, and the agency overseeing approval is located at 3091 County Center Drive, Suite 190, Auburn, CA. Claudia Garcia, a technician with the agency, serves as the primary point of contact for inquiries regarding the permit. The application does not include contractual elements typical of federal acquisitions, such as FAR clauses, payment terms, invoicing systems, COR or PCO designations, or defined periods of performance. No contract value, pricing details, CLINs, or cost estimates are provided, nor are there any references to packaging, delivery terms, inspection criteria, or quality standards beyond land use and environmental regulatory compliance. There is no formal list of attachments, representations from offerors, socioeconomic certifications, or special requirements like security clearances or options clauses. The submission deadline for the permit is October 23, 2025, and the approval process is centered on confirming that the proposed modifications meet local zoning and environmental exemption criteria. The entire process is governed by state and county regulations, specifically CEQA and county code provisions, with no involvement of federal acquisition regulations or procurement frameworks.