YUB-49 & SIE-49 Damaged Trees Removal (EA 03-2N900)

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 3 – Marysville/Sacramento, is preparing to execute a tree removal project along State Route 49 in Yuba and Sierra Counties under the project title YUB-49 & SIE-49 Damaged Trees Removal (EA 03-2N900). The scope includes the removal of fallen and storm-damaged trees within the state right-of-way, stump grinding, proper disposal of debris, implementation of temporary traffic control measures, and site restoration to ensure safe and unimpeded roadway access. Work is confined to specific post mile segments: PM 4.65 to PM 9.33 in Yuba County and PM 0.01 to PM 1.90 and PM 16.35 to PM 16.64 in Sierra County. The project is categorically exempt from full environmental review under both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Class 1(d)) and the National Environmental Policy Act (23 CFR 771.117(c) and (d)), eliminating the need for permits and allowing for expedited implementation under routine maintenance procedures. Performance will be conducted entirely at the roadside locations in California, with inspection and acceptance handled by Caltrans District 3 either on-site or at their offices in Marysville. The project was posted as a forecast on July 21, 2026, with no solicitation number or contract value specified, and no formal pricing, line items, or financial details are included in the documentation. There are no identified contract clauses, evaluation factors, special requirements, or offeror representations, indicating this is an internal environmental determination and planning document rather than a competitive solicitation. The primary point of contact is Jason Ammerman, Environmental Scientist, reachable at the provided phone number and email. Additional project personnel include Joshua Faughn and Ethan Hyde, who are involved in environmental planning and project management. The work will be administered from Caltrans District 3’s office at 703 B Street, Marysville, CA, with no mention of invoicing systems, payment details, delivery terms, or performance timelines. The absence of standard procurement elements such as FAR clauses, pricing sections, or submission instructions suggests the project is being executed through direct internal administrative authority under existing environmental exemptions.