Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Government Contract opportunity from Department Of Education was posted on October 4, 2018. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT FOR READING

Awarded
IESE180056APFederal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541720
New
Federal
Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) Updates
Solicitation # 693JJ926R000067
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is soliciting proposals for a single-award, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) completion contract to update the Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) evidence-based reference guide and its companion document, Countermeasures At Work (CMAW). The project involves developing the 13th and 14th editions of CMTW and the 2nd edition of CMAW, as well as updating the Electronic Countermeasures That Work (E-CMTW) website. The selected contractor will conduct comprehensive literature searches and synthesize research across eleven behavioral traffic safety program areas, updating approximately three to four chapters annually. The contract period consists of a twelve-month base period with four twelve-month options, for a total potential duration of sixty months. Award will be based on best value, with a primary emphasis on superior technical skills over the lowest cost. Evaluation factors include the offeror's understanding of research complexities, the soundness of the proposed approach, personnel qualifications, and corporate past performance. Deliverables must adhere to strict quality control standards, including the use of APA 7th edition style and rigorous anti-plagiarism compliance. All final text must be submitted in electronic format using minimal formatting to facilitate government printing. Proposals must be submitted in two separate volumes, technical and business, by November 5, 2026.
693JJ9 Nhtsa Office Of Acquistion

POSTED

about 17 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 8 days
NAICS: 541720
New
SLED
ARFQ-0402-EDD2700000004-2 | Statewide Evaluation for the 21st CCLC Program
Solicitation # ARFQ-0402-EDD2700000004-2
The West Virginia Department of Education is seeking a statewide evaluator for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program, authorized under Title IV, Part B of the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The selected contractor will be responsible for collecting, validating, and analyzing evaluation data, which includes conducting at least one annual on-site visit to five selected subgrantees and delivering one in-person presentation of findings in Charleston, West Virginia, each contract year. Services are anticipated to begin in January 2027, with a Statewide Evaluation Plan due within 60 calendar days of the effective start date. This fixed-amount agency contract will be awarded to the vendor that meets all minimum qualifications and mandatory requirements for the lowest overall total cost, calculated as the sum of the initial contract year and three optional renewal years. Deliverables must be provided in accessible formats, including Microsoft Word, searchable PDFs, and nonproprietary machine-readable datasets. Due to the nature of the work, the contractor must adhere to strict data privacy standards, including FERPA compliance and the execution of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements. Bids must be submitted electronically via wvOASIS or delivered to the agency by November 12, 2026, at 10:30 AM EDT.
West Virginia

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 14 days
NAICS: 541720
New
SLED
Program Evaluation Services for the Local Community Benefits Fund
Solicitation # 2026-040
Solicitation 2026-040, issued by the Community Investments Office of the Air District, seeks a contractor to provide program evaluation services for 28 Round 1 grantees of the Local Community Benefits Fund. The project is designed to support the Air District's mission of improving air quality, reducing environmental inequities, and mitigating climate change across nine Bay Area counties. The contract has an established budget of 1,500,000 dollars and an anticipated duration of up to six years. The work is divided into two primary phases: Phase A, focusing on indicator tracking technical assistance for early grant implementation, and Phase B, which covers output tracking, analysis, and periodic program evaluation, culminating in a final synthesis of findings during years five and six. The selection process involves a two-phase evaluation consisting of a proposal review and an interview. Proposals are evaluated based on technical merit, with a preference given to local businesses headquartered within the Air District's jurisdiction. In the event of a tie in scoring, the lower cost offer will be accepted. Key requirements for respondents include a detailed technical proposal, a separate cost proposal, a disclosure regarding the use of Generative AI, and a commitment to retain project records for five years. The deadline for electronic submission via the procurement portal is November 30, 2026, at 4:00 pm Pacific Time.
Community Investments Office

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in about 1 month
NAICS: 541720
New
Federal
Continuing Human Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS)
Solicitation # FA238424S2233
The Continuing Human Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS) program is a Multiple Authority Announcement (MAA) managed by the Air Force Research Laboratory Human Effectiveness Directorate and the United States Air Force School of Medicine. The program provides a comprehensive strategy for science and technology research, progressing from basic research to technology maturation to optimize and protect Airman capabilities across Air, Space, and Cyberspace. The scope is divided into three primary areas: Airman Biosciences, which focuses on biotechnology and aerospace medicine; Bioeffects, which addresses battlefield environmental stressors; and Warfighter Interactions and Readiness, which enhances mission execution. The MAA utilizes a flexible procurement framework, employing various authorities including Broad Agency Announcements, Other Transaction agreements for research and prototypes, and grants. Awards are generally anticipated to be cost-plus-fixed-fee. The selection process typically involves a two-step approach requiring an initial five-page white paper and rough order of magnitude cost, followed by a full technical and cost proposal for selected candidates. Evaluation is prioritized by technical merit, specifically focusing on innovation, understanding of scope, technical soundness, and transition potential, with cost realism serving as a secondary factor. Recent updates include several moratoriums to preserve competition, specifically closing technical areas related to BRDEE, Information Mastery in Cognitive Warfare, and Holistic Models for Decision-Making for six-month periods following specific proposal closing dates. All contractor personnel must undergo a minimum Tier 1 background check for positions of trust, and offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management. The program maintains strict data rights and security protocols, including foreign influence due diligence and specific DFARS requirements for technical data and computer software.
Air Force Research Laboratory

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

N/A

AI Contract Overview

Show more

The Department of Education, through the Contracts and Acquisitions Management office, awarded contract 91990018C0046 to the American Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences for the impact evaluation of training in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support for Reading in early elementary school. This award, associated with solicitation IESE180056AP and NAICS code 541720, has a total value of 17,413,245 dollars and a total potential period of performance spanning 72 months. A key administrative clarification for this cost-plus-fixed-fee engagement involves the requirement for a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan. The government requires vendors to propose how both parties will perform quality assurance procedures to ensure the quality of submissions and performance, which is typically documented in annual Contractor Performance Assessment Reports. The QASP is intended to be a living document that evolves during the contract term and was not used as a formal evaluation factor for the award. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

General Info

Contract Value

$40,947,225

NAICS

541720 - Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities

Place of Performance

DC, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Award Issued Date

Documents

1

Award Notice: Impact Evaluation of Training in MTSS-R (91990018C0046)

DOCX, Low priority2 pages · award
Low

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Contract not broken down yet

CLEATUS splits the solicitation into Uniform Contract Format (UCF) sections: scope, pricing, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.

Timeline

6 updates
PhaseAwarded
Posted

Sources Sought

Type Changed

Sources Sought → Presolicitation

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Type Changed

Presolicitation → Solicitation

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Get full access to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Education → Contracts And Acquistions Managemen
Contacts2 people available
OfficeWASHINGTON, DC, 20202, USA
Office AddressWASHINGTON, DC, 20202, USA
Contacts
Joseph GibbsContract Specialist
Ryan BattadContracting Officer

Full Description

Show more
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION SCIENCES NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION EVALUATION AND REGIONAL ASSISTANCE IMPACT EVALUATION OF TRAINING IN MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT FOR READING IN EARLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Tracking #: IESE180056AP CAPABILITY STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS The U.S. Department of Education (the Department) is conducting market research to determine if sufficient interest and capability exists in the marketplace for the Impact Evaluation of Training in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support for Reading in Early Elementary School, hereafter referred to as "MTSS-R evaluation." This notice is NOT a request for proposals, but is an invitation for potential offerors to express interest and provide information regarding their relevant knowledge, skills and capabilities. Information submitted in response to this Special Notice may be used to assist the Department in finalizing its acquisition strategy. Disclaimer: The Department will not pay for the provision of any information nor will it compensate any respondents for providing this information. No entitlement to payment of direct or indirect costs or charges by the government will accrue as a result of the submission of a response or use of such information. This notice does not obligate the Government to award any contract to any interested party, nor does it restrict the Government in its ultimate acquisition approach. Feedback will not be provided to any interested party who submits information to the Department in response to this notice. Capability Statement Submission Deadline The deadline for submitting Capability Statements and Basic Information responses is May 11, 2018 by 2:00 PM (EST) via e-mail to the following individuals: contact@example.gov, and cc: contact@example.gov. In addition, please request a reply email to confirm receipt of electronic correspondence. Primary Point of Contact: Sara Steinberger Contract Specialist contact@example.gov +1 (555) 000-0000 Secondary Point of Contact: Ryan Battad Contracting Officer contact@example.gov +1 (555) 000-0000 Capability Statement Instructions In response to the attached draft Performance Work Statement (PWS), the Department hereby solicits capability statements from eligible, interested parties. Capability Statements shall be no longer than 3 pages (single-spaced, with a minimum of one-inch margins and 12 point font). Contractors should include up to 4 resumes in the appendix. Only resumes for potential key personnel that would work on the anticipated contract are to be included. Each resume must clearly document that individuals have the experience and expertise described below. Each individual resume must be no longer than 4 pages. (Resumes will not be counted as part of the 3 page limit for the capability statement.) Vendors shall provide responses for the items noted below. The responses in the "Basic Information" section do NOT count against the 3 page Capability Statement page limit. BASIC INFORMATION a) Company Name: b) Address: c) Point of Contact (include contact information such as a corporate email address and website URL): d) Number of Employees: e) Gross Annual Receipts: f) Previous contract(s) performing same or similar services as identified in this notice, to include contract type (Firm-Fixed Price, Time and Materials, etc.); overall contract value; Agency/Business Entity contracted with; brief overview of services performed: g) GSA Holder? If yes, GSA Contract number: h) State if your business believes that GSA OASIS contracts are a viable procurement tool for the anticipated work; and if so, under which pool? i) State if your company believes that the DRAFT MTSS-R evaluation PWS contains any unduly restrictive language or content? Why? Please cite specific examples and provide feedback. j) Are you a small business/large business/not-for-profit/educational institution according to NAICS code 541720? Please also include all socioeconomic categories for your company and the associated NAICS codes: k) Are you a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Business (Yes/No): l) Are you a certified HubZone Small Business (Yes/No): m) Are you a Woman Owned Small Business (Yes/No): n) Does this requirement provide opportunities for small business subcontracting? Why or why not? o) Does this requirement provide opportunities for a small business set-aside? Why or why not? CAPABILITY STATEMENT CONTENT AREAS (subject to 3 page limit) The capability statement must describe the collective expertise and experience of your company's personnel, in each of the following areas: - Experience and skill in managing, designing and conducting large-scale random assignment studies of interventions designed to improve educational outcomes. Interested parties shall provide a minimum of two examples of personnel's successful past experience and skill in leading, managing, designing, and conducting all aspects of evaluations (preferably in education settings) that are similar to this procurement in content (e.g., early literacy instruction, supports for struggling readers, early literacy measurement, multi-tiered systems of support), methodology (e.g., randomized controlled trial), complexity (e.g., recruitment effort, competition of training provider, implementation support), scope (e.g., national), sample size, and data collection modes (e.g., study-administered, individual assessments, teacher and staff surveys). - Experience and skill in authoring well written, policy relevant publications with clear take-home messages for varied audiences. Interested parties shall provide a minimum of two examples of personnel's involvement with authoring publications that clearly summarize experimental findings and present them in a manner such that they can be understood and used by a wide audience. - Substantive knowledge relevant to the DRAFT MTSS-R evaluation, including early literacy instruction, supports for struggling readers, and early literacy measurement. Interested parties shall provide a minimum of two examples showing that personnel have relevant knowledge to effectively study and support implementation of the intervention, particularly capitalizing on what is known from the research literature. In addition, the capability statement shall address the following experience and capacity at the corporate level: - Experience with projects similar in nature and scale to that described in the Draft MTSS-R evaluation PWS. Interested parties shall provide evidence of successful corporate experience with a minimum of two past projects that are similar to the requirements described in the Draft MTSS-R evaluation PWS, in terms of the specific tasks to be performed, scale, and scope required. Please also address the following questions (limited to no more than five (5), single spaced, pages in your response: 1. Do you see any risks/potential problems with the Government's methods/needs, as it relates to the PWS? How do you propose to revise/mitigate these issues? 2. Do you have any questions/information you suggest we include to ensure you fully understand the Government's requirements? 3. What contract and pricing structure/methodology do you recommend? Should the Government consider other types of contracts such as Cost Reimbursement, Firm-Fixed Price, Time and Materials, or a hybrid contract pricing structure? How do you propose we maintain the flexibility to change the contract direction as conditions change, while maintaining accountability and risk mitigation to both parties? Please provide examples of similar work and what agency has implemented this structure/methodology. 4. Are there Government wide contract vehicles that can be used to support this requirement? If yes, please identify specific vehicles. 5. Based on the Draft PWS, how would you recommend the schedule of deliverables be structured to accommodate the objectives of this study and maximize the benefit for each period of performance? 6. Please provide a rough order of magnitude (ROM) on a reasonable fee percentage for this effort and the rationale behind it, to include identifying risks, problems, etc. As of right now, the Government is estimating an 8% fee. Please note there are no guarantees the Government will adjust the fee percentage as result of this RFI, and it ultimately reserves the right to set the fee percentage it deems is in the best interest of the Government. 7. Is there any other information that you wish to convey to the Department? The Department does not intend to post a Questions and Answers amendment to this notice. Instead, the Department intends to take those questions as items that will be utilized to strengthen the Department's RFP/Solicitation documents. Respondents may be contacted for additional information and/or invited to discuss your approach/questions in person or via teleconference. A letter stating your interest or requesting a copy of the solicitation is NOT sufficient to determine contractor capability. Failure to respond to this market research does NOT prohibit vendors from responding to the resulting solicitation, should one be issued in the future. NO SOLICITATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME and no date has been established for the RFP issuance.

More opportunities from Department Of Education → Contracts And Acquistions Managemen

Same awarding agency

Earlier notices in this NAICS code

Posted before this notice, open and closed

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS