Notice of Intent - ArchiPLUS Software Renewal

This solicitation, numbered 70Z03826QM0000008, is a combined synopsis and request for quotation issued under FAR Part 12 for the renewal of ArchiPLUS Software under a sole-source, firm-fixed price purchase order. The requirement is unrestricted, classified under NAICS code 513210 with a small business size standard of $47.0 million, and anticipates award to the lowest-priced, technically acceptable offeror. The period of performance runs from April 1, 2026, to March 31, 2027, with deliveries F.O.B. Destination to the Aviation Logistics Center in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Submissions must be emailed to jeremy.a.wood@uscg.mil by February 17, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. EST, with the solicitation number clearly indicated in the subject line; phone inquiries are prohibited. Offerors must comply with extensive cybersecurity and supply chain integrity obligations, including implementation of NIST SP 800-171 safeguards for Controlled Unclassified Information, adherence to prohibitions on covered telecommunications equipment and unmanned aircraft systems under NDAA Section 889 and the American Security Drone Act, and strict compliance with OFAC sanctions regarding Iran, Sudan, and other sanctioned jurisdictions. Mandatory certifications regarding foreign trade activities, subcontractor flow-down of security requirements, and disclosure of non-compliant products are required, with violations triggering reporting obligations via DIBNET or to the Contracting Officer. The contract incorporates numerous revised FAR clauses, including enhanced security provisions, whistleblower protections, and restrictions on internal confidentiality agreements, all governed by active deviations authorized under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. Invoicing must follow FAR 52.212-4 and be submitted via email to ALC-Fiscal@uscg.mil, with payment processed electronically per FAR 52.232-33. No pricing details are provided in the solicitation, indicating that offers will be evaluated on a price-to-technical acceptability threshold basis without trade-offs, and the absence of quantitative cost data confirms the reliance on offeror-submitted pricing for award determination.