Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Combined Synopsis/Solicitation opportunity was posted on April 10, 2017. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Indian Health Service Agency-wide Credentialing Management Solution

Awarded
17-236-SOL-00020Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 518210
New
Federal
RFI - FEMA - Supply Chain Management System (SCMS)
Solicitation # 70FA3127I00000001
The Department of Homeland Security, through FEMA's Logistics Management Directorate, is conducting market research via a Request for Information to identify cloud-based Software-as-a-Service solutions for the transition, implementation, operation, maintenance, and modernization of the Supply Chain Management System. The system is designed to support disaster logistics operations, including warehouse and transportation operations, inventory management, in-transit visibility, point-of-distribution support, and financial reconciliation. The scope encompasses recurring SaaS licensing, cybersecurity and system authorization support, and optional surge capacity to handle disaster-response requirements. Technical requirements include FedRAMP High certification, compliance with DHS Enterprise Architecture, and adherence to Section 508 accessibility standards. The anticipated period of performance consists of one 12-month base period with four 12-month option periods. While most work will be performed at the contractor's site, some activities may occur at FEMA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., or facilities in Virginia. This RFI is for planning purposes and is not a formal solicitation; however, interested parties must submit a narrative response, a Vendor Streamlined Profile Matrix, and a Targeted Market Research Questionnaire by January 4, 2027. Respondents are required to provide a non-binding Rough Order of Magnitude cost estimate and disclose any potential organizational conflicts of interest. All submissions must be unclassified and follow specific formatting and submission guidelines via email.
Information Technology Development And Sustainment

POSTED

about 17 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 2 months

AI Contract Overview

Show more

The Indian Health Service is seeking a firm fixed-price contract for an agency-wide credentialing management solution under solicitation 17-236-SOL-00020. This opportunity is a total small business set-aside and will be awarded based on a best-value decision, meaning the government may select an offeror other than the lowest priced bidder. The evaluation process prioritizes technical capability and past performance over price, with a specific focus on the software solution's capabilities, the implementation plan, training, and technical support. To be considered for award, bidders must meet mandatory criteria across technical capability, implementation, training, support, past performance, and pricing. Technical proposals are graded on an adjectival scale from Exceptional to Unacceptable, while past performance is rated from Outstanding to Unsatisfactory. The government will evaluate the total cost of the basic requirement plus all options to determine price reasonableness and overall value.

General Info

IHS seeks a small business for a firm fixed-price credentialing management software solution.

Agency

N/A

Contract Value

$1,325,723.3

NAICS

518210 - Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services

Place of Performance

Phase 1- Pilot Areas Billings Area Office � Billings, MT Oklahoma Area Office � Oklahoma City, OK Albuquerque Area Office � A, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20857, USA

Set-Aside

SBA

Award Issued Date

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

4 updates
PhaseAwarded
Posted

Combined Synopsis

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

Notice details unchanged. Attachments may have changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Get full access to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyN/A
Contacts2 people available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
N/A
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Daniel RosenstengelContract Specialist
Kenneth G. TruesdaleContracting Officer

Full Description

Show more
MANDATORY CRITERIA The below are mandatory criteria and will have to be met prior to award of the contract: a. Technical Capability of Software Solution b. Credentialing System Implementation Plan c. Training d. Technical Support e. Relevant Past Performance f. Price TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA The criteria below are listed in the relative order of importance. Technical Capability and Past Performance, when combined, are more important than price. Relative Order of Importance Factor 1 Factor 1: Technical Capability of Software Solution 2 Factor 2: Credentialing System Implementation Plan 3 Factor 3: Training (Initial and as needed) 4 Factor 4: Technical Support 5 Factor 5: Relevant Past Performance ADJECTIVAL RATING The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal using the following adjectival rating. Rating Adjectival Description Blue Exceptional Greatly exceeds all minimum requirements of the criteria; has a high probability of success; contains no weaknesses or deficiencies. Green Good Exceeds all the minimum requirements of the criteria; has an above average probability of success; contains no significant weaknesses and only minor, correctable weaknesses exist. Orange Acceptable Meets all the minimum requirements of the criteria; has an average probability of success; no significant weaknesses and any deficiencies can be readily corrected. Yellow Marginal Fails to meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the criteria; low probability of success; major weaknesses and/or significant number of deficiencies exist. Red Unacceptable Fails to meet any of the minimum requirements of the criteria; proposal needs major revisions; very low probability of success. PAST PERFORMANCE Rating Symbol Definition Neutral N No past performance available for evaluation. Offeror has asserted that it has no directly related or similar relevant past performance experience. Proposal receives no merit or demerit for this factor. Outstanding O Based on the Offeror's record of past performance, no issues, concerns, or risks are associated with receiving timely services and contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror's experiences indicate that the Offeror is capable of exceeding the requirements of the delivery order. The Contractor has demonstrated significant experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations. Good G The Offeror's record of past performance indicates there is very little risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services and full contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror's experience indicate the Offeror will meet or exceed the requirements of the delivery order. The Contractor has demonstrated experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations. Acceptable A The Offer's record of past performance indicates that there is some potential risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services, and contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror's experience indicate the Offeror may have some problems during performance of the delivery order. The Contractor has demonstrated limited experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations. Unsatisfactory U The Offeror's record of past performance indicates it will be unable to perform successfully on the delivery order. COST/PRICE FACTORS Offeror(s) cost/price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through price reasonableness techniques as described in FAR 12.209. The Offeror shall submit firm fixed prices for all requirements. EVALUATION OF OPTIONS It is anticipated that any contract awarded from this solicitation will contain option provision(s) and periods(s) In accordance with FAR clause 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options, (July 1990) the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic requirement, except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s) SELECTION FOR AWARD FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items (Oct 2014). - This is a best value decision and award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror. (a) The Government intends to award a firm fixed-price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

Earlier notices in this NAICS code

Posted before this notice, open and closed

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS