SAP Commercial Single Source Justification: Administrative and Operations Services

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA), under the Department of Homeland Security, has issued a firm-fixed-price purchase order (70T01026P7668N002) to TMC-TeleSolv for a three-month extension of administrative and operations services through August 24, 2026, valued at $99,997.91. This action follows the expiration of the prior task order (70T01024F7668N058), which provided executive support, budgetary planning, project coordination, and business process improvement under the now-expired DHS PACTS II contract and was originally set to conclude on February 24, 2026, but extended to May 24, 2026, due to a prior lapse in appropriations. The current extension is mandated to prevent a service gap during the transition to the new GSA OASIS+ procurement vehicle, as the DHS appropriation lapse from February 14 to April 30, 2026, delayed recompetition efforts. The award is justified under FAR Part 12 as a single-source acquisition due to TMC-TeleSolv’s unique expertise and proprietary licensing agreements, with no other qualified sources available. No formal options under FAR 52.217-8 or FAR 52.237-3 are available beyond this extension, as the PACTS II contract expired on February 28, 2025, and its terms prohibit further extensions after February 28, 2026. The purchase order is administered by TSA’s Finance and Administration office in Springfield, Virginia, with Michael Capovilla as the Contracting Officer and Khiana Washington as the technical point of contact. The scope of work involves nationwide real estate administrative services, including facility coordination and property management, with performance centered in Springfield, District of Columbia. No detailed line-item pricing, delivery specifications, or shipping terms are provided, consistent with service-based commercial item acquisitions. All representations, certifications, and socioeconomic status disclosures from the contractor are absent, and no invoicing methodology or accounting codes are specified. The action adheres strictly to FAR 13.106-1(b) for partial extensions and reflects a best-value determination based on continuity, cost-effectiveness, and vendor uniqueness rather than a lowest-price technically acceptable approach.